Open 81 - The New C9 - Game Over

orangepenguin · Post Post #1125 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:23 pm

strife220 wrote:
orangepenguin wrote:I don't really see why the only cases recently have been on supposed bussing that may or may not be true, which is why I haven't bothered in voting for either choices as of now.
So you're only going to assess other's cases for choosing your vote? There's still lots of time left in the day and tons of people in the game... anybody should be able to come up with a at least half decent suspect.

Like I kind of said, I've been lazy.

But I do need to re-read, because I haven't in a while, and if I find a case worth exploring, I will do.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #1126 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:03 am

I know it's taking forever, but it'd be nice if I didn't have to make the decision for the town who to kill.

Mod: Please prod everybody that's inactive.

strife220 · Post Post #1127 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:33 am

Unofficial vote count:

Korts
- (3) {StrangerCoug, roflcopter, forbiddanlight}

BM
- (1) {Strife}

Not Voting: {Korts, orangepenguin, Iron Man, ting =), silence, The Fonz, Battle Mage}.

With 11 alive it's 6 to lynch.

8 days until deadline... everybody should have their votes out

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #1128 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:24 am

I'm going to analyze iamausername because he's the only known scum. Hold on. Toastel Strudel rubbish is on its way.

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #1129 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:28 am

One of these players that iamausername voted for is scum:

Vote: -TinVision- (orangpenguin)
Vote: Korts
Vote: Greasy Spot (ting =))

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #1130 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:33 am

tinvision/orangepenguin... is town.
ting... is town.
Korts.... is scum.

Wow, it took me 4 minutes to break the game. That's a record, even for me.

unvote, vote: Korts

StrangerCoug · Post Post #1131 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:14 am

You don't give any reasoning for your vote, Toaster Strudel. All that is to me is confirmation bias.

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #1132 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:46 am

tinvision/orangepenguins and ting's post are of varying length. That's because they're paying attention, reaction more, reacting less.

Korts is posting a lot of little useless posts. I don't like that. He's the scummiest of the three. Let's lynch him.

Why, SG, you think Korts is town? Please explain why you think this is so. Convince me.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #1133 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:07 am

One, who is SG?

Two, I don't. I simply don't like people voting and not giving a good reason why.

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #1134 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:52 am

SG = StrangerGougar

StrangerCoug · Post Post #1135 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:54 am

There's only two G's in my name. The one you have capitalized is a C as in Charlie.

ting =) · Post Post #1136 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:46 pm

korts wrote:I'm find it odd how GS posted two posts after fl's claim yet didn't care to comment on it...

I find it odd how you're suddenly putting heat on GS, after more or less ignoring the whole thing with Fonz for the whole yesterday.

silence · Post Post #1137 (ISO) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:45 pm

Toaster: what makes you think one of those who iamausername voted is scum?

Does anyone have good reasons to why would scum have tried to kill armlx (which is what happened if we don't have a doc)?

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #1138 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:22 am

silence wrote:Toaster: what makes you think one of those who iamausername voted is scum?

Does anyone have good reasons to why would scum have tried to kill armlx (which is what happened if we don't have a doc)?

I've been scum often enough to have noticed that scum absolutely cannot refrain from bus'ing on Day 1.

Korts · Post Post #1139 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:42 am

Toaster Strudel wrote:tinvision/orangepenguin... is town.
ting... is town.
Korts.... is scum.

Wow, it took me 4 minutes to break the game. That's a record, even for me.

unvote, vote: Korts

Applause! What a great analysis...

ting =) wrote:
korts wrote:I'm find it odd how GS posted two posts after fl's claim yet didn't care to comment on it...
I find it odd how you're suddenly putting heat on GS, after more or less ignoring the whole thing with Fonz for the whole yesterday.

My intention was not to put heat on GS/you for this. It was just a note. Your back-and-forth with Fonz I ignored because it was based on irrelevant minutiae and mutual misrepresentation. Plus, walls of text.

Toaster Strudel wrote:
silence wrote:Toaster: what makes you think one of those who iamausername voted is scum?

Does anyone have good reasons to why would scum have tried to kill armlx (which is what happened if we don't have a doc)?
I've been scum often enough to have noticed that scum absolutely cannot refrain from bus'ing on Day 1.

Anecdotal evidence does not prove the accusation of bussing whatsoever.

Toaster Strudel wrote: Korts is posting a lot of little useless posts. I don't like that. He's the scummiest of the three. Let's lynch him.

I understand that you narrowed the field down to three based on IAUN's Day 1 votes, but do you have any proof of my posts being useless?

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #1140 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:29 am

Korts wrote:I understand that you narrowed the field down to three based on IAUN's Day 1 votes, but do you have any proof of my posts being useless?

Well they sure don't seem particularly helpful to me...

Korts · Post Post #1141 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:44 am

Toaster Strudel wrote:
Korts wrote:I understand that you narrowed the field down to three based on IAUN's Day 1 votes, but do you have any proof of my posts being useless?
Well they sure don't seem particularly helpful to me...

What's this called, uh, confirmation bias? Please quote and prove to me that I didn't contribute.

skitzer · Post Post #1142 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:52 am

Hmm...for once, TS's reasoning almost makes sense to me.

Rogueben · Post Post #1143 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:29 am

Hey guys. I've sent out a general prod. I expect everyone to post before deadline or I will have to find replacements over night.

I'm looking for a replacement for Jordan/BM at the moment.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #1144 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:30 am

Well, not much to say here. I'm behind a Korts lynch. I will add I'm not so sure I like TS' generalizations and will be looking closer at his predecessor and himself.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #1145 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:11 pm

Same deal here.

strife220 · Post Post #1146 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:19 pm

I still think BM is a pretty good lynch and people should consider him in more detail.

But deadline in 5 days - Korts is obviously the call

Unvote, Vote: Korts

That's L-1, I think. Claim or die.

ting =) · Post Post #1147 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:51 pm

vote:fonz.

Putting my vote where my mouth is. I'm less sure about the korts case, but i'm willing to switch my vote if I have to.

Korts · Post Post #1148 (ISO) » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:05 pm

strife220 wrote:I still think BM is a pretty good lynch and people should consider him in more detail.

But deadline in 5 days - Korts is obviously the call

Unvote, Vote: Korts

That's L-1, I think. Claim or die.

"Claim or die", how I hate that phrase...

Doc. Protected armlx N0, roflcopter (now TS, I think) N1, SC N2. SC is therefore confirmed.

strife220 · Post Post #1149 (ISO) » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:15 am

Unvote

If Korts is lying I don't see a need for the real doc to claim today. But we should keep in mind that just because there was a no-kill last night doesn't confirm there's a 2nd doc.

I don't actually like the case against the Fonz.

Vote: BM

Unofficial vote count:
Fonz - 1 (Ting)
BM - 1 (Strife)
4 days til deadline.