So the idea I had when I made that vote was that, in that gamestate it was about time to change up the wagons. People had been giving me shit about not explaining the Ram vote (although IIn post 1449, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:You wanted votes on you? Why?
In post 1438, Iconeum wrote:there's a part of me that is reluctant to vote off a claimed JOATIn post 1435, Akarin wrote:So I thought we didn't want to elim Zor through the JOAT claim? Did that change or was it not just as much a consensus as I thought it was?
but then Zor went AKF yet again and is contributing literally nothing
he also made that wallpost that concluded to absolutely nothing, which read to me like trying to appear like he was doing stuff
also Nancy apparently was a big fan of that post, but ended up voting Zor anyway so *shrug*
Link/quote?In post 1443, Iconeum wrote:if ur hellbend on that apology, I do think i've done that already for the part i truthfully feel bad about
In post 1396, Iconeum wrote:I'm sure we can handle this like adults and in a proper manner, neither of us are out of line here i feel so there really isn't anything to get this pissed about
If i'm really making you this angry IRL, then i'm sorry for that. It's not intentional. But I do believe i'm being very reasonable here and really trying to help you figure me out.
Give it a shot?
PlusIn post 711, Pine wrote:lolwut
Akarin literally the only player with less content than me, pushing me as a potentially-viable counterwagon to Zor.
In post 1074, Pine wrote: Based on my earlier reads and the current wagon composition, I consider the Zoraster wagon to be cursed. Akarin was scummy af earlier and I like that wagon comp better.
VOTE: Akarin
That's a lot of certainty, and sort of highlighting the naked vote for emphasis.In post 1100, Pine wrote: Yeah an Akarin vote here feels like a Town endorsement of BB
I mean I've hardly been playing the game all day, what are you expecting?In post 1453, Iconeum wrote:Akarin's ISO still reads pretty underwhelming, but these latest posts at least have a townie vibe to them
you answer your own question hereIn post 1459, Akarin wrote:Like he's not the worst wagon of all time, but it felt like that wagon completely died out, he didn't really do anything, and now it's E-1? Doesn't feel like a scum wagon, feels implacable.
However @Ico, if you’re going to continue to say shit it obviously isn’t true, you might as well not bother because it looks to me like you’re more interested in bs shading me rather than correctly sorting me.In post 1451, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:In post 1438, Iconeum wrote:there's a part of me that is reluctant to vote off a claimed JOATIn post 1435, Akarin wrote:So I thought we didn't want to elim Zor through the JOAT claim? Did that change or was it not just as much a consensus as I thought it was?
but then Zor went AKF yet again and is contributing literally nothing
he also made that wallpost that concluded to absolutely nothing, which read to me like trying to appear like he was doing stuff
also Nancy apparently was a big fan of that post, but ended up voting Zor anyway so *shrug*This is what I mean by you continually misrepping me. I said it wasn’t a “bad” post and you somehow get from that, I’m a “big fan”?
And you pushing me as a Pine buddy were based on my saying that I had reasons to think his reaction was town indicative for another. This is why I’m not tr you.
please realize that i'm having the exact same feelings about youIn post 1464, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:However @Ico, if you’re going to continue to say shit it obviously isn’t true, you might as well not bother because it looks to me like you’re more interested in bs shading me rather than correctly sorting me.
Actually if Ico were to flip scum and Shea were to seriously push me for this, I may have to re-evaluate that read because it’s off the charts whack. But I would hope he would realize that and understand that the entirety of my ISO makes 0 sense coming from scum and I would be seriously tilted if he focuses on that and ignores the entirety of my posting. It’s bad enough that Ico - whatever he is - has been doing this to me but to punish me for that is appalling irrespective of what Ico is.In post 1439, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:More like patently absurd.In post 1413, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 1411, Thestatusquo wrote:Looked a lot like theatre. Sometime to file away for later if either of them ever flips red.
im not saying it's impossible, but it's just funny.
But Akarin, that’s an obvious misrep, to say I was a “big fan” of that post. All I did say was it wasn’t a “bad” post, which is clearly not even remotely the same thing.In post 1444, Akarin wrote:I was townreading Nancy for other stuff, not really interested in voting her today, but obviously will reevaluate later.In post 1438, Iconeum wrote:also Nancy apparently was a big fan of that post, but ended up voting Zor anyway so *shrug*
In post 1447, Iconeum wrote:oh don't get me wrong, i have no intention of voting or pushing Nancy but i would LOVE to sort herIn post 1444, Akarin wrote:I was townreading Nancy for other stuff, not really interested in voting her today, but obviously will reevaluate later.In post 1438, Iconeum wrote:also Nancy apparently was a big fan of that post, but ended up voting Zor anyway so *shrug*
You could start by not misrepping what I’m actually saying.In post 1438, Iconeum wrote:there's a part of me that is reluctant to vote off a claimed JOATIn post 1435, Akarin wrote:So I thought we didn't want to elim Zor through the JOAT claim? Did that change or was it not just as much a consensus as I thought it was?
but then Zor went AKF yet again and is contributing literally nothing
he also made that wallpost that concluded to absolutely nothing, which read to me like trying to appear like he was doing stuff
also Nancy apparently was a big fan of that post, but ended up voting Zor anyway so *shrug*
