![Shifty-Eyed :shifty:](./images/smilies/icon_shifty.gif)
~power
skipped reading the setup right away to have like a more carefree approach to the game and towngleam better, something like that. It was at least a half conscious choice I made early onIn post 1394, PenguinPower wrote:Why would you not read the setup? It’s a randomly generated setup and understanding how it’s created seems somewhat important for people who care about that stuff - not me.In post 1390, Isis wrote:i maybe need to read the setup because this is adjacent enough to role madness that like, the next person that gets run up claims PR too much of the time anyway and it's silly, maybe
~penguin
not reallyIn post 1398, Shirou wrote:so you're saying intelectually there's likely scum in the nullish/negleted slots? because there's not many consensus town reads and I don't think people are "town reading everyone except some names"
Idk - I thought you would be one to more gravitate to understanding the setup so I’m a bit confused.In post 1403, Isis wrote:what did you expect?
I am explicitly not.In post 1404, Bridgeburners wrote:@penguin, you're forgetting your Ponglin nickname
i went back and read the numberings on my posts and that was the least fun/spicy, most plausible post for that to be about QQ
In post 1409, Isis wrote:it's kind of like how on those nickelodeon game shows where round 1 is worth 300 points, round 2 is worth 500 points, and round 3 is worth 1000 points, the key to an exciting and interesting taping of the episode is that the children be too ignorant and foolish to do stretches during rounds 1 and 2 instead of screaming about comebacks.
It has happened.In post 652, Isis wrote:I'll connect with you about something one day PP I swear it
I don't think I've ever gotten this far this ignorant about a setup ever. I don't think that's alignment indicative though I really liked tinkering with the mechanics in Apocalypse, I wrote an actual software program and lied about what the results were in Death List.In post 1406, PenguinPower wrote:Idk - I thought you would be one to more gravitate to understanding the setup so I’m a bit confused.In post 1403, Isis wrote:what did you expect?
~pengwon
I agree with thisIn post 1413, Isis wrote:one thing I hate is that the rules for setup construction don't let you like, -feel- how likely each subsetup is, i can read these rules and then press the button and get 4 K's and you could be like "is that a remarkable result?" and I'd say "I don't fucking know, I've never never internalized 10%*(seven choose 4) before", if it's a setup drawing balls from urns or throwing dice or drawing cards to generate I can feel it because I do those things and they're shorthand
why not actually out of curiosityIn post 1417, Bridgeburners wrote:i actually maybe don't tr shirou
has not*