given how many PR's we apparently have, a protective role would be too muchIn post 1070, Battle Mage wrote:I think alsoNo massclaim- just in case we have a protective - makes no sense to out them prematurely.
samantha explicitly claimed she didn't cross over with inthebeginning. samantha sussed because i guess, what's the odds of a tracker AND a watcher? obviously she had less info then on the being gated front.In post 1034, Ydrasse wrote:why does samantha sus you if you go to esoteric?
you may be right, but the WIFOM has value too. I mean, I've already claimed so I don't really get a say, but FWIW, I would say No Massclaim today.In post 1075, esotericzoomer wrote:given how many PR's we apparently have, a protective role would be too muchIn post 1070, Battle Mage wrote:I think alsoNo massclaim- just in case we have a protective - makes no sense to out them prematurely.
not to advocate for massclaiming but still it seems unlikely
she could have seen Itb visit esoteric n1 and tried to get him to claim a nonsense roleIn post 1048, Ydrasse wrote:hmIn post 954, samantha97 wrote:since the day is about to end probably I might as well say I don't have a result or anything on in the beginning, I was just trying to bait a bad claim
but I'm also pretty confident he is mafia & hope you guys consider him tomorrow
I keep telling you I'm notIn post 1053, Funeral Goose wrote:Gamma, u aint scum is u?
this feels a bit awkward to me.In post 952, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: italiano
I think I’m willing to try this
I think this is E-1?
let's use that info then, eh?In post 943, Ydrasse wrote:italiano gives a fuckton more info than cookie
Gamma and Goose's idea. Wanna bet 1 of them is scum?In post 942, Ydrasse wrote:oh my god why are we voting cookie over italiano
she literally said that didn't happen thoughIn post 1078, Gamma Emerald wrote:she could have seen Itb visit esoteric n1 and tried to get him to claim a nonsense roleIn post 1048, Ydrasse wrote:hmIn post 954, samantha97 wrote:since the day is about to end probably I might as well say I don't have a result or anything on in the beginning, I was just trying to bait a bad claim
but I'm also pretty confident he is mafia & hope you guys consider him tomorrow
id say defoIn post 708, lendunistus wrote:Mini Normal 2193 Official Vote Count - Day 1 Hammer Edition
Lunar Martian(7): Cookie Monster, Happy Unbirthday Boon, esotericzoomer, Battle Mage, samantha97, Funeral Goose, ItalianoVD[HAMMER]
ItalianoVD(3): In the beginning, Gretchen, Lunar Martian
Cookie Monster(2): Gamma Emerald, Ydrasse
Not Voting(0):None.
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to eliminate.
Deadline: (expired on 2021-02-14 17:00:00)
Why no mass claim at this point?In post 1077, Battle Mage wrote:you may be right, but the WIFOM has value too. I mean, I've already claimed so I don't really get a say, but FWIW, I would say No Massclaim today.In post 1075, esotericzoomer wrote:given how many PR's we apparently have, a protective role would be too muchIn post 1070, Battle Mage wrote:I think alsoNo massclaim- just in case we have a protective - makes no sense to out them prematurely.
not to advocate for massclaiming but still it seems unlikely
I've already claimed. VT if you don't remember.In post 1087, Battle Mage wrote:i would agree that whoever we collectively decide to elim, should ultimately claim before we elim them. Not clear yet whether that's Gamma or you.
How would you know who they tracked?In post 1041, Funeral Goose wrote:Town looks stacked. Nice try ITB, but you screwed up your fake claim by not saying you were on Gret N1.
While perhaps not a super high probability, I think it's a far cry from impossible. I also think your particular vote on it looks really bad compared to the rest.In post 1053, Funeral Goose wrote:Does anyone think the entire scum team was on Lunar?
If not, that would give us a ITB, Gamma PoE.
Gamma, u aint scum is u?
Or... We could lim scum and force scum to have to kill me rather than have town mislim me. Scum's pptions are clearly limited at this point; they want to keep the poe pool as wide as possible so that they don't box themselves into a corner.In post 1057, Ydrasse wrote:could nuke itb today and go into lylo(?) tomorrow w/o paranoia there
What do you mean, "benefit of the doubt"? Do you really think scum fake claim vig there and expect to ride that claim to lim lo?In post 1063, Battle Mage wrote:I'll give benefit of the doubt to Ydrasse.
I never "claimed". I crumbed very loudly, yes, but I didn't claim tracker Day 1.In post 1064, Battle Mage wrote:ITB claimed tracker Day 1
I didn't town read them, and still don't. I think they are deepwolfing. They're making comments here and there, but they are all superfluous.In post 1076, Battle Mage wrote:1. Why did you target esotericzoomer N1?
Lots of people have expressed scum reads on this slot. Good PR play isn't always dictated by one's reads; you have to account for what's best for the game as a whole. I might town read Cookie, but getting a negative result there is more beneficial to 1) double-check I'm not just biasing myself into a wrong read and 2) it's info that will help others sort the slot once the info is given.In post 1076, Battle Mage wrote:2. Why did you target Cookie Monster N2, if she was amongst your townreads?
Perhaps it would be better if you showed it rather than tell it.In post 1079, Gamma Emerald wrote:I keep telling you I'm notIn post 1053, Funeral Goose wrote:Gamma, u aint scum is u?
I'm fine with this. I think Goose has objectively had the scummier play this game, but Gamma is hard enough to read that I could very well be wrong there.In post 1080, Battle Mage wrote:I'm convinced I want to elim within Gamma-Goose today. 1 town, 1 scum in that pair. Can we have them case each other?
Why should we mass claim?In post 1086, Funeral Goose wrote:Why no mass claim at this point?