Open 806: JK9++ (Game Over!)

[Isis]

petapan is town

[Bridgeburners]

also before i forget - peta's posting on this page is kinda anti-partner-y with dats and sechyd

~ skitteR

[Bridgeburners]

sigh, last page to clarify

why is he town isis?

~ skitteR

[petapan]

peta am i understanding this right:
- you're staying off of implo because while you're not solidly townreading him you don't like his wagon
- you're voting for aff for essentially being underwhelming?

like it doesn't 100% make sense to me that you're basically avoiding implo because you disagree with the wagon while voting aff for fairly weak reasons / piggy-backing off of dats post as he's being wagoned for kinda meh reasons ....

~ skitteR

i don't think the reasons for scumreading aaron are weak

[petapan]

i'm anti-partnered with everyone, which means i am obviously the serial killer

[Bridgeburners]

I don't want to talk too much but last two things I want to note are:

1) I'll be trying to use a Katsuki-style in this game after I'm done reading it. Optimally I want to only spend a few minutes each couple of days here, until I feel there's content enough for me to read, or even re:read the whole game and come to a solve. I'm not going to be using capslock

or claiming masons

though, I mean Katsuki-style because I want to learn to lurk more, and scream less. This game is an attempt of me trying to play mafia and be productive elsewhere at the same time.


2) My first thought in the few pages/ posts I did read was that regardless of his actual alignment, Ben would be wagoned, so it's a bit funny to me that he's the top wagon now that I'm replacing-in. For what it's worth, I don't think this fact is related to his alignment at all, it's just easy to see what the common suspects in a game are gonna be, regardless of their actual alignment.

soooo in your first post of content you

-establish you will basicly not be playing this game outside of a couple minutes

every couple of days

-admit to be actively lurking this game, before you even caught up (why did you rep in then? is that even a question i'm allowed to ask?)
-discredit the ben wagon before supposedly not being caught up, while solidly fence-sitting the wagon itself

yeah i'm not exactly impressed by your opening

-seCret

also peta i liked the tone of htis post actually
i can see your critiques but i'm not sure they're *scum-indicative* if that makes sense

~ skitteR

pedit you're basically voting aff for being underhwelming and not townie enuf, no? was there another part of it that i'm missing?

[petapan]

the caps lock part is what I was wondering about? Why is implo towny there

@isis

if that post doesn't read towny to you I feel like you have a PT with some other players you could ask about it

it's very analytical

hmm i'm not sure if scum!isis posts this, but at the same time i don't like how this comes off tonally

another post i hated from aaron in my notes was this one where he just openly fencesits on isis, who was getting a lot of scumreads early

[Isis]

bcause even if aaron is town this is a v real scumcase

And petapan looks so bad here if this flips town if peta is scum

[Isis]

i don't want to explain your pt membership to you that much tho skitteR

[Bridgeburners]

preflips are Very Bad >:(

~ skitteR

[petapan]

the stuff i'm pointing out tends toward the earlygame as that was what left a strong impression but like. do i need to fullblown scumcase the guy right now just to prove my feelings are REAL

(btw that thing where i agree with datisi's read on the last page is entirely within my range as scum, see the recently completed popcorn mafia. irrelevant because i'm town here, but just so you know!)

[Bridgeburners]

i'm sure you could, like, case better if you wanted to (or if i, like, demanded it) as either alignment, so i'm not sure going through the motions of actually writing the case is going to prove much tbh

but like again the current stated reasons in thread basically boil down too: being wishy-washy, not townie enuf, some amt of iioa, piggy-backing off of dats's criticism and it's just, like, very lazy and feels like a sort of read scum might make to hasten a looming misflip on that one townie that is just posting badly. and it doesn't 100% gel with the way you're playing around implo who's functionally getting run up in a very similar manner

like sure you *can* write up a scumcase on aff using the reasoning you're giving but i'm not sure they actually make him scum?

(and i'm sure you can do the dats post thing you did on the previous page as scum! in fact i think that's a minor scumtell - not just for you, but like in general!)

~ skitteR

[Bridgeburners]

also what do u think of my 2man scumteam theory?

~ skitteR

[petapan]

i don't agree at all that the reasons for the scumreads on the two are remotely similar and it's baffling that you're trying to argue that

[Bridgeburners]

well the reasons aren't the same per se but functionally how the wagons are playing out in the gamestate are kinda similar

~ skitteR

[petapan]

also what do u think of my 2man scumteam theory?

~ skitteR

maybe. i don't know. i always feel the "everyone seems so town" type of statements are at best complacent and at worst deceptive (and are also bad to make for other reasons that i won't get into)

[Bridgeburners]

sorry peta :/

VOTE: peta
i'm not sure this is gonna, like, get traction here but i think this is a better use of my vote than not-voting aff

~ skitteR

[petapan]

i mean, hopefully not

[Something_Smart]

Scipio read as pretty towny to me.

[Isis]

skitter you will have to NK me you won't be able to play around me

[Bridgeburners]

Scipio read as pretty towny to me.

maybe i'm tunneled? i don't think i am? peta's reading kinda scummy to me in this interaction tbh.
i did kinda like scipio tbf

skitter you will have to NK me you won't be able to play around me

i will bear that in mind!

~ skitteR

[PenguinPower]

I disagree with skitteR

[Bridgeburners]

that's ok! this is the vote i've felt the best abt all game tho, so i think i'm going to keep it for now

~ skitteR

[PenguinPower]

Awww - i was waiting for a setup of “about what?”

Too bad - filing that gif for later.

[Bridgeburners]

ok we can still do the bit tho

i say: about what
cue penguin:

~ skitteR
(i'm kinda assuming you were talking abt my peta read)