This post strikes me as overly aggressive.
In post 133, Aristophanes wrote:I was glad Italiano caught that error as E-1 seemed premature and a little close for comfort to me since lolhammers are always a possibility and early ones are hard to read.
Oh, so your comment was with regards to the VC. Okay, that makes a bit more sense. I don't agree with the paranoia about lolhammers; sure, they do happen, but like I said, they get scrutinized as well, so it's a very risky move for scum to make. If anything, I would imagine weaker scum teams are most likely to take advantage of them because it is like a free mislim in some ways, especially if they didn't think they would last long.
(In reference to
42 Huh? Why wouldn't you expect scum on the wagon? Or at least, why do you think it's an unreasonable take from Ari?
Let's not deal in absolutes. Mafia isn't that kind of game. I think it makes perfect sense as scum; it's one of those "hindsight is 20/20" style comments, and those are more likely from scum who knows a player is/was town and thus purposely stayed off the wagon.
I'm pretty sure we had at least 5 days then, unless the desdline was a week. (Admittedly, I don't remember what the day deadline rules for that game were.)
In post 167, StatueSurfer wrote:Honestly, knowing we were still in RVS, I just skimmed the first 30 or whatever posts, and then picked someone to vote for a silly reason. I did see his name come up in a couple votes, but I thought he only had like 2 or 3 people voting for him. Anyway, it was just an RVS vote, so UNVOTE:
I don't like this; it seems a bit overly defensive.
In post 167, StatueSurfer wrote:Well... I have no idea. I think if scum *are* present they are either a) in the first three, since it's unlikely they planned to try to turbo someone on page 2, although other scum could've hopped on because B) they are (more likely) one of the people who put Murdercat to E-1, in hopes that a clueless townie might hammer him (yes... I realize this includes me.)
This is a whole bunch of words that would be elegantly summarized by your first sentence. I also don't buy that a townie would have no clue as to whether there is scum on the wagon. They could at least argue from a probabilistic standpoint even if they didn't scum read any of the individual votes.
Humans don't always make optimal decisions. They can and have many times made mistakes and errors, some big and some small.
In post 179, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why does not liking the leading wagons = wanting to no elim? Is there no one you find scummier?
You didn't roll scum again, did you?
Except... it would be more unusual for there NOT to be one from basic probability theory...
In the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.