Mini Number 2195 | Brutalism | GAME OVER


User avatar
Elements
Elements
she/her
Bloop
User avatar
User avatar
Elements
she/her
Bloop
Bloop
Posts: 7739
Joined: December 15, 2018
Pronoun: she/her
Location: Arrakis

Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:22 am

Post by Elements »

i've got a plan
let's vote me out to prove all your speculations about me being scum wrong
VOTE: elements
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
All my completed games
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:22 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1074, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:You having me somehow below them is also funny - what cause i fos you?
Ah yes that is... precisely the exact opposite of how this game happened.
In post 462, Green Crayons wrote:I'm getting scum pings from RTP and Harumi.
In post 477, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Im starting to understand the foses on you
you suspected me because I said you were suspicious. thank you for projecting.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:24 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1074, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Ur stuck on this like null read bc u dont wanna be forced to vote them or take a stance on them
"GC/elements scum bc GC townreads elements"

oh wait


"GC/elements scum bc GC nullreads elements"
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
VP Baltar
VP Baltar
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
VP Baltar
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 18539
Joined: November 3, 2008
Pronoun: he/him

Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:24 am

Post by VP Baltar »

In post 1075, Elements wrote:i've got a plan
let's vote me out to prove all your speculations about me being scum wrong
VOTE: elements
What was duchess's case on me that I was misrepresenting?
YOUR AD HERE

Too busy with work to play mafia right now but I shall return some day!
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:25 am

Post by Green Crayons »

for reference, so you can't go "nuh UH I didn't ACTUALLY say those EXACT WORDS":
In post 746, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:
In post 704, Datisi wrote:didn't you say you had too many scumreads earlier?

also ok, but how are you coming to partnered / associate reads then?
Their interactions with each other suggest it, even recently GC outted an unsubstantiated townread on elements
In post 1074, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Ur stuck on this like null read bc u dont wanna be forced to vote them or take a stance on them
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Elements
Elements
she/her
Bloop
User avatar
User avatar
Elements
she/her
Bloop
Bloop
Posts: 7739
Joined: December 15, 2018
Pronoun: she/her
Location: Arrakis

Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:26 am

Post by Elements »

In post 1078, VP Baltar wrote:
In post 1075, Elements wrote:i've got a plan
let's vote me out to prove all your speculations about me being scum wrong
VOTE: elements
What was duchess's case on me that I was misrepresenting?
it wasn't a case
you were saying Duchess claimed to have *caught me lurking*
Duchess claim to have *caught me while I was online*
and you just kept saying stuff about catching me lurking
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
All my completed games
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:26 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1075, Elements wrote:i've got a plan
let's vote me out to prove all your speculations about me being scum wrong
VOTE: elements
are you triggering me on purpose?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Elements
Elements
she/her
Bloop
User avatar
User avatar
Elements
she/her
Bloop
Bloop
Posts: 7739
Joined: December 15, 2018
Pronoun: she/her
Location: Arrakis

Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:27 am

Post by Elements »

In post 1081, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1075, Elements wrote:i've got a plan
let's vote me out to prove all your speculations about me being scum wrong
VOTE: elements
are you triggering me on purpose?
If I'm triggered, you can be triggered too
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
All my completed games
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
Goon
Posts: 468
Joined: January 23, 2021

Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:42 am

Post by Reformed Toxic Player »

In post 1079, Green Crayons wrote:for reference, so you can't go "nuh UH I didn't ACTUALLY say those EXACT WORDS":
In post 746, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:
In post 704, Datisi wrote:didn't you say you had too many scumreads earlier?

also ok, but how are you coming to partnered / associate reads then?
Their interactions with each other suggest it, even recently GC outted an unsubstantiated townread on elements
In post 1074, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Ur stuck on this like null read bc u dont wanna be forced to vote them or take a stance on them
Ur own words you walked your townread back saying it was a null read - both are scummy regardless. Nice try tho.
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
Goon
Posts: 468
Joined: January 23, 2021

Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:44 am

Post by Reformed Toxic Player »

In post 1076, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1074, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:You having me somehow below them is also funny - what cause i fos you?
Ah yes that is... precisely the exact opposite of how this game happened.
In post 462, Green Crayons wrote:I'm getting scum pings from RTP and Harumi.
In post 477, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Im starting to understand the foses on you
you suspected me because I said you were suspicious. thank you for projecting.
No it was not the reason - it was the way you were presenting your reads that i was understanding.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:46 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1083, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Ur own words you walked your townread back saying it was a null read
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
Goon
Posts: 468
Joined: January 23, 2021

Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:47 am

Post by Reformed Toxic Player »

you didnt even press the point then -> i say these kinds of offhand comments just to see what ppl will or will not reply to. I find it amusing you are trying to bring up those same comments as suspicious now that its convenient.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:49 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1084, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:
In post 1076, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1074, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:You having me somehow below them is also funny - what cause i fos you?
Ah yes that is... precisely the exact opposite of how this game happened.
In post 462, Green Crayons wrote:I'm getting scum pings from RTP and Harumi.
In post 477, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Im starting to understand the foses on you
you suspected me because I said you were suspicious. thank you for projecting.
No it was not the reason - it was the way you were presenting your reads that i was understanding.
oh yes your suspicion was clearly a process problem, you clearly weren't suspecting me because i suspected you:
In post 470, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:I already revealed it.

I'll quote it when im not at work
But discred me more will ya?

I think imma do trustfalls when i get home and analyze isos
In post 474, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:
In post 471, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 466, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:And whats scummy about the actions youve stated, i.e. whats the scum motivation?
ignoring direct inquiries means not having to explain your actions/reads

not pushing game forward means not potentially taking heat by pushing town vote, like lurker or active lurker status

your town tell with Harumi tbd I want to hear your response first
Can you identify which posts of mine are not attempting to push the game forward?
Because you are going to look silly when i prove you wrong
In post 477, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:I mean you are going to be looking silly when i prove your points about ne wrong because i know youre fudging them.

Im starting to understand the foses on you
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Elements
Elements
she/her
Bloop
User avatar
User avatar
Elements
she/her
Bloop
Bloop
Posts: 7739
Joined: December 15, 2018
Pronoun: she/her
Location: Arrakis

Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:50 am

Post by Elements »

if there somehow isn't scum in <RTP, GC, VB> mafia are having a field day
I agree with everything Elements is posting - Papa Zito
It's scummy as fak tho - Gamma Emerald
All my completed games
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:50 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1086, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:you didnt even press the point then -> i say these kinds of offhand comments just to see what ppl will or will not reply to. I find it amusing you are trying to bring up those same comments as suspicious now that its convenient.
lol

you have ignored me c o n s t a n t l y this game

when i pushed you on it, you said that you had already answered it (you hadn't), and called me suspicious for trying to discredit you
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
Goon
Posts: 468
Joined: January 23, 2021

Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:52 am

Post by Reformed Toxic Player »

Like youre not even responding to the accusation that i said thay youre trying to widen poe -> you outted a bunch of ppl yousay you would be "unopposed" to eliminating. Like u threw in a bunch of inactive slots and added me and called it a day.

I'm not the best with words ever and can adlib and explain things wrong ->but my overall point is often sound. I.e incorrect mapping but correct route
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
Goon
Posts: 468
Joined: January 23, 2021

Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:52 am

Post by Reformed Toxic Player »

In post 1089, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1086, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:you didnt even press the point then -> i say these kinds of offhand comments just to see what ppl will or will not reply to. I find it amusing you are trying to bring up those same comments as suspicious now that its convenient.
lol

you have ignored me c o n s t a n t l y this game

when i pushed you on it, you said that you had already answered it (you hadn't), and called me suspicious for trying to discredit you
If you did push me on it then you'd have quoted it.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:53 am

Post by Green Crayons »

also it's not that i'm bringing them up now because now it's convenient

i'm bringing it up now because your past comments show when your current comments are bs

the "convenience" is just showing the lack of validity in your present comments based on your past play
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:55 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1090, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Like youre not even responding to the accusation that i said thay youre trying to widen poe -> you outted a bunch of ppl yousay you would be "unopposed" to eliminating. Like u threw in a bunch of inactive slots and added me and called it a day.
i dont understand what that means but also i dont care about how you envision how i should play so i have no inclination to respond to your characterization of my play
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
Goon
Posts: 468
Joined: January 23, 2021

Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:55 am

Post by Reformed Toxic Player »

K whatever i may have taken the wrong points that can be potentially NAI but im like confident on this and elements will flip scum and it will incriminate u
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
Goon
Posts: 468
Joined: January 23, 2021

Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:56 am

Post by Reformed Toxic Player »

In post 1093, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1090, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Like youre not even responding to the accusation that i said thay youre trying to widen poe -> you outted a bunch of ppl yousay you would be "unopposed" to eliminating. Like u threw in a bunch of inactive slots and added me and called it a day.
i dont understand what that means but also i dont care about how you envision how i should play so i have no inclination to respond to your characterization of my play

you do know what it means u just wanna waste conversation to fluff and ignore it.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:57 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1091, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:If you did push me on it then you'd have quoted it.
it's literally right there beside the posts i quoted
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:58 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1095, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:
In post 1093, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1090, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:Like youre not even responding to the accusation that i said thay youre trying to widen poe -> you outted a bunch of ppl yousay you would be "unopposed" to eliminating. Like u threw in a bunch of inactive slots and added me and called it a day.
i dont understand what that means but also i dont care about how you envision how i should play so i have no inclination to respond to your characterization of my play

you do know what it means u just wanna waste conversation to fluff and ignore it.
VOTE: RTP
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:58 am

Post by Green Crayons »

no idea what the fuck "widen poe" means so thanks for your bad faith argument and your bs suspicions that are literally because i suspected you
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Reformed Toxic Player
Goon
Goon
Posts: 468
Joined: January 23, 2021

Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 6:59 am

Post by Reformed Toxic Player »

You misquoted me to remove context about the foses on you- you're full of shit.

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”