Micro 997: Superb Idea Mafia - GAME OVER

[DkKoba]

in case you havent noticed gamma has literally poofed where I am trying to poke them - and are the primary slot I want to pressure right now. funnily enough you're my 2ndary one but i've been giving you breathing room for now but now im lightly annoyed by you so ill reveal that now.

[DkKoba]

gamma was online last night ~ and yet opted to avoid this thread - this is for gamma a light scum tell so NAGL already.

[DkKoba]

oh didnt notice the dates but was posting the night before but not here, i.e. they were online after I had casted my vote on him and seems they have dodged it

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

ok bugspray is clear of groupscum

And therefore sadly you are not. The Legends that have reached my table are of a posting machine, regardless of being stirred into action or otherwise. Why, The Legends speak of the Bored DkKoba being quite an aggressive poster and taking on many points at once!

As for our yappy Outworlder friend, perhaps prod and poke the people who are here and active, to refine your reads and such? You are not appreciative of the narrative formed by Momrangel and myself, why? What of the case presented does not appear good to you? What would your options be should a Vigilante place you in a do or fade situation?

a vig? prob just goad them into shooting me bc i dont do well with those kinds of threats.

your assumption of my playstyle being alignment indicative is a bit of a reach. im waiting on a reaction from my primary suspect - and momrangel's line doesn't quite interest me because it feels fudged although i think they lean town for their play thus far.

Though the question was not aimed at you, your response is appreciated. I do not fully believe your behaviour truly alignment indicative - simply a matter for concern that The Legends may have exaggerated you a touch. Your responses since are beginning to live up to the bar that has been provided to me that represents the standard of your play.

In addition to this, you are quite firmly null at this point, and my expectations of your play have not factored into that read.

I do see your points on Gamma Emerald as being valid, yet find it quite concerning you're willing to verify a players site activity in such a way.

[Titus]

Ugh. I am in tunnel mode. This is bad. I can't see anything but Star, although there are other scum to find.

@Mad Hatters, Why is Koba's verification a problem? It is such a common thing to do, it's even in the ongoing games rules.

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

Because quite frankly we don't know an individuals circumstances. To factor in play elsewhere on site would require actively stalking that players games to gauge their activity in those games and then utilise potential discussion of those games.

I, myself, have my site presence hidden beyond the posts I make. I do recall seeing a game where a player was called out for inactivity and thread dodging as they were dealing with a conversation in another game at the time.

We do not know external circumstance. The content is what a slot should be judged on. Unless DkKoba is able to provide proof without falling foul of the site rules of play, then for me it will not be considered.

For example, I was curious about Bugsprays' post and did a little investigation. The conclusions of which I will not reveal, as it is not alignment indicative nor should it be.

[Momrangal]

NGL, I'm coming to the same conclusions as Koba here wrt Gamma

[BBmolla]

Image is from a performance as Han Solo in The Farce Awakens at Redwood Theatre Company, Summer 2017.

Votecount 1.06

Gamma Emerald - 3 - pirate mollie, DkKoba, WhemeStar
WhemeStar - 2 - Titus, Mad Hatters Tea Party
bugspray - 1 - Gamma Emerald
DkKoba - 1 - bugspray
OutworldER - 1 - Momrangal

Not Voting: OutworldER

Deadline: (expired on 2021-03-08 02:00:00)

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to elim.


Mollie is V/LA
bugspray has requested replacement.

[/area]

[WhemeStar]

Mom hop on the wagon! Everyone is welcome!

[DkKoba]

Because quite frankly we don't know an individuals circumstances. To factor in play elsewhere on site would require actively stalking that players games to gauge their activity in those games and then utilise potential discussion of those games.

I, myself, have my site presence hidden beyond the posts I make. I do recall seeing a game where a player was called out for inactivity and thread dodging as they were dealing with a conversation in another game at the time.

We do not know external circumstance. The content is what a slot should be judged on. Unless DkKoba is able to provide proof without falling foul of the site rules of play, then for me it will not be considered.

For example, I was curious about Bugsprays' post and did a little investigation. The conclusions of which I will not reveal, as it is not alignment indicative nor should it be.

you can see proof in "view users post" on gamma's profile.

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

Perhaps you missed the part where I investigated how many other games our dear Bugspray is in?

I would much rather keep my efforts to the game where they belong. By all means, you may do as you wish and use this "tell"; however, I will not.

[Reformed Toxic Player]

Perhaps you missed the part where I investigated how many other games our dear Bugspray is in?

I would much rather keep my efforts to the game where they belong. By all means, you may do as you wish and use this "tell"; however, I will not.

thats cool. slot's still town.

[DkKoba]

Perhaps you missed the part where I investigated how many other games our dear Bugspray is in?

I would much rather keep my efforts to the game where they belong. By all means, you may do as you wish and use this "tell"; however, I will not.

thats cool. slot's still town.

whoops this me

[OutWorldER]

ok bugspray is clear of groupscum

And therefore sadly you are not. The Legends that have reached my table are of a posting machine, regardless of being stirred into action or otherwise. Why, The Legends speak of the Bored DkKoba being quite an aggressive poster and taking on many points at once!

As for our yappy Outworlder friend, perhaps prod and poke the people who are here and active, to refine your reads and such? You are not appreciative of the narrative formed by Momrangel and myself, why? What of the case presented does not appear good to you? What would your options be should a Vigilante place you in a do or fade situation?

I think my biggest problem at the moment is that the claim (as far as I understand it, my head can be in multiple places sometimes) is that Momrangal gambited a 3p claim to draw out the real 3p, which is Wheme. This makes her town but...why? I don't see why a very adventurous scum couldn't venture to out the 3p for town points and to get rid of a threat during the night, especially since a lot of 3p's in the Superb Idea thread are basically just "Townie but they leave the game after doing something".

This is especially a problem since Wheme being the 3p is a contested idea.

[Gamma Emerald]

is there a particular reason I'm being wagoned?

[DkKoba]

is there a particular reason I'm being wagoned?

day copped you guilty.

[DkKoba]

ok bugspray is clear of groupscum

And therefore sadly you are not. The Legends that have reached my table are of a posting machine, regardless of being stirred into action or otherwise. Why, The Legends speak of the Bored DkKoba being quite an aggressive poster and taking on many points at once!

As for our yappy Outworlder friend, perhaps prod and poke the people who are here and active, to refine your reads and such? You are not appreciative of the narrative formed by Momrangel and myself, why? What of the case presented does not appear good to you? What would your options be should a Vigilante place you in a do or fade situation?

I think my biggest problem at the moment is that the claim (as far as I understand it, my head can be in multiple places sometimes) is that Momrangal gambited a 3p claim to draw out the real 3p, which is Wheme. This makes her town but...why? I don't see why a very adventurous scum couldn't venture to out the 3p for town points and to get rid of a threat during the night, especially since a lot of 3p's in the Superb Idea thread are basically just "Townie but they leave the game after doing something".

This is especially a problem since Wheme being the 3p is a contested idea.

i policy claimed 3p, but whether or not wheme is a 3p is up in the air and not confirmed. they are, from my read, not groupscum which makes it more likely they arent scum/3p in general, alongside bugspray slot.

[DkKoba]

is there a particular reason I'm being wagoned?

hope you have more to say than this btw

why did you avoid this game after I voted you?

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

Forgive me if I'm wrong, DkKoba, but you stated a 3p policy removal. Surely if this is the case your vote would firmly be placed upon Momrangel or Whemestar?

[Gamma Emerald]

I'm just really disinterested in mafia rn
also whose daycop guilty is it

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

DkKoba was the one to claim the role and result.

[DkKoba]

Forgive me if I'm wrong, DkKoba, but you stated a 3p policy removal. Surely if this is the case your vote would firmly be placed upon Momrangel or Whemestar?

I swear no one reads my posts... I said that this only applies to when they are Claimed.

[DkKoba]

I'm just really disinterested in mafia rn
also whose daycop guilty is it

rolling scum too many times in a row does exhaust the mafia effort huh

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

Hmm, I was under the impression both had claimed. It appears Momrangal softed at best. Interesting.

[WhemeStar]

Apparently I have claimed third party