Mini Normal 2201 | Silly Stock Photos | Endgame

[Something_Smart]

If enabler was truly a scum claim then there would be no need to quickhammer, as he would be getting limmed regardless once she pointed that out

I was just coming to this same conclusion, and I think it makes samantha scum.

[OutWorldER]

Samantha, how did you know people would unvote?

I mean, this question really sums up why she's scum, doesn't it?

Rathe claims Mailman Enabler.

If the Mailman was online at that time, they would unvote.

[samantha97]

Samantha, how did you know people would unvote?

it's one of those roles that instills enough doubt that I thought it'd let them off the hook

it was a now or never kind of thing, and rathe isn't exactly easy to read posts-wise either

[OutWorldER]

Or if they were not on the wagon, they would tell people to get off.

Either way, it prevents the mailman Rathe was enabling from stopping the lim.

[Something_Smart]

But it instills unjustified doubt, which you are immune to? For what reason are you immune to it?

[Luca Blight]

That stance doesn't align with:

can you all promise to not wait until deadline tomorrow cause this is definitely gonna be a town lynch no matter who it is

[Luca Blight]

Nor does it align with this:

anyone else concerned at how rathe has like 10+ people who voted him and there are 3 mafia

[samantha97]

But it instills unjustified doubt, which you are immune to? For what reason are you immune to it?

you put the word unjustified there

[samantha97]

thanks for quoting me being right luca

now quote where I called you mafia

unlike you I don't have 100% confidence in anything, even your alignment, no matter how much I think you are mafia

you conveniently left out the post before I voted where I had doubts because you weren't on the wagon

[Something_Smart]

Well, you thought that enabler was very likely a scum role, but that other people would doubt it and be wrong in doing so. Does that not mean you thought their doubt would be unjustified?

[samantha97]

Well, you thought that enabler was very likely a scum role, but that other people would doubt it and be wrong in doing so. Does that not mean you thought their doubt would be unjustified?

no I had doubt myself, I just thought it was more likely than not and wanted to take the chance while the window of opportunity still existed

[Luca Blight]

Well, you thought that enabler was very likely a scum role, but that other people would doubt it and be wrong in doing so. Does that not mean you thought their doubt would be unjustified?

no I had doubt myself, I just thought it was more likely than not and wanted to take the chance while the window of opportunity still existed

So why did you then unvote?

Or should I say, pretend to unvote?

[samantha97]

because we didn't have a votecount, it got negative feedback, and it was a rash decision even if I thought it was a good one

there was no pretending

[Something_Smart]

I just thought it was more likely than not

But other people would not think this, and might unvote instead.

Why did you think you were right and they were not?

[samantha97]

not gonna say the same thing 5 times in a row

if people can't see through luca's thinly veiled rehashing posts that he already read, then we're probably gonna lose anyway

[Something_Smart]

Is that at me?

[samantha97]

ya I already explained this yesterday and today

sorry if you genuinely have questions but I don't want to get mired in this & from my perspective it's already been hashed out

[Something_Smart]

What I'm looking for is: what led you to believe that your opinion about the claim was more likely to be accurate than, for example, Infinity's?

I don't believe you've answered this.

[samantha97]

What I'm looking for is: what led you to believe that your opinion about the claim was more likely to be accurate than, for example, Infinity's?

I don't believe you've answered this.

huh? I don't think infinity claimed

[Something_Smart]

Infinity's opinion. Or mine. Or anyone else on the wagon.

[samantha97]

didn't consider it/care depending on how you look at it

[Luca Blight]

because we didn't have a votecount, it got negative feedback, and it was a rash decision even if I thought it was a good one

there was no pretending

..but you knew it would get negative feedback, that's why you did it, remember? Because you knew people would unvote

and I'm not rehashing anything, I'm countering your points and showing the inconsistencies and contradictions in your arguments and progressions

I guess I'm gonna have to meta Samantha to see if she actually is this bad as Town.

[Luca Blight]

not gonna say the same thing 5 times in a row

if people can't see through luca's thinly veiled rehashing posts that he already read, then we're probably gonna lose anyway

You're in no position to act superior, given you've played worse than anyone this game if you're town

If you really believe I'm scum why don't you vote me and push my lim instead of continuous posturing like this?

[samantha97]

You're in no position to act superior, given you've played worse than anyone this game if you're town

If you really believe I'm scum why don't you vote me and push my lim instead of continuous posturing like this?

yes you're a seasoned warrior of day 1 gj

and I'm not voting you because there's no chance of enough people agreeing with me now

if you're mafia, the only way through you is through associatives, which I hope umlaut provides

[Luca Blight]

Outworld's wagon at its peak

samantha97

(1): OutWorldER

Umlaut

(4): Iconeum, Momrangal, Infinity 324, Rathe

OutWorldER

(6): Luca Blight, samantha97, esotericzoomer, Andres, Datisi, Anya

Icon

(1) Andres

Not Voting

(2): LlamaFluff, Umlaut