In post 193, DkKoba wrote:here's an exercise for everyone though, how many scum do you think there are?
My first thought was 3 and the 6 town were going to be the 6 pieces but that sounds imbalanced
Could still be 3 for the 3 correct/3 mislychee thing
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
In post 201, Andante wrote:I'm assuming 2 scum tbh, but I'd bet they have like extra vote/day killing powers
I've never played nightless before, but if they have day kill then I agree probably 2
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
Because, I would assume that town would want to reach out to someone if they're wrong on them in an attempt to explain -- you're assuming that I'm not going to speak with you.
In post 209, Virgo wrote:You didn't say that -- but you didn't say anything about, arguably, the biggest/most content-heavy case made against you so far.
FAM. THE GAME JUST STARTED, WHAT KIND OF CONTENT DRIVEN READ DO YOU EXPECT FROM ME??? Amy literally just entered - terrible entrance I must say
Like, before this is the only interaction towards me, and you've not expressed any sort of read. So what is the assumption with me making a case and voting you, in your mind?
In post 211, Virgo wrote:Because, I would assume that town would want to reach out to someone if they're wrong on them in an attempt to explain -- you're assuming that I'm not going to speak with you.
I mean, I told yall I'm town, you REVOTED ME so I kinda don't care to beg you, there's 7 others I can talk to
Like, before this is the only interaction towards me, and you've not expressed any sort of read. So what is the assumption with me making a case and voting you, in your mind?
And I've interacted with anyone else but flow? fam, just stop trying to tunnel me for 1 second, your arguments aren't holding up cause you're trying to pick certain info...
To me, the reason I specifically asked why you were uninterested: from what I've seen so far, I believed that your reply would /care/ more that someone who you had thanked before to unvote you, was now voting you. That feels more in line with how you've behaved and not a "I'll just ignore it" sort of attitude.
I am saying that there is a dissonance (from my perspective) in the progression of your emotions, and the conclusion that I come to from that is that you're /acting/ and forcing them rather than them being natural to what's happened.
