THIS IS A RUSSIAN SPY.In post 206, samantha97 wrote:sorry to hear about your grandfather
also bell is confirmed town by being the first to join the cool kids table
REAL AMERICANS KNOW NUKES ARE SUPERIOR
THIS IS A RUSSIAN SPY.In post 206, samantha97 wrote:sorry to hear about your grandfather
also bell is confirmed town by being the first to join the cool kids table
THIS IS AWFUL. I AM SORRY.In post 203, Bell wrote:And my grandpa has a subdural hematoma and I'm gunna go to the hospital now.
Fucking fuck fuck.
HIPPIE EUROSCUM
YOU CAN'T TRICK ME COMMIE SCUMIn post 528, mastina wrote:PookyTheMagicalBear
gorilla
Prism
Bell
Lady Lambdadelta
Cephrir
samantha97
joqiza
mary
Equinox/The Entity
Save the Dragons
Nexus
Robert M Hunter
DeasVail
Toogeloo
Titus
DeathNote
The Church of Skitter (Alisae/Menalque)
T3
Untrod Tripod
deep-city-lights
Vaxkiller
Et Al (Skitter/SS)
In hindsight, by and large I feel like that this is actually more accurate in spite of it basically inverting my previous scumreads and scumleans categories.
I ALSO PLAYED FOR YEARSSSSSSIn post 930, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:FUCK ALL OF YOU
I BETA TESTED EPICMAFIA BEFORE ITS RELEASE.
I AM THE OLDEST EPIC MAFIA ACCOUNT HERE.
I AM YOUR QUEEEEEENNNNNN
OH HUSH I AM ALLOWED TO DO THISIn post 935, Save The Dragons wrote:back in my day...
Yawn.In post 1100, Prism wrote:I can't believe the words coming out of my keyboard but this is by far the most tolerable & limited posting mastina has made in awhile and the idea she has to go for gamehealth is nonsense
Yep it's called WH13 was also a slog where any Mastina post was awful but at least I was a mason while I was alive in that one so I had town control to override her bullshit.In post 1105, Prism wrote:Can you explain for me why this is the case in this game but not in WH13?
No townie in their right fucking mind should have picked a number of roles like Fail Safe and Fallout Shelter over a silo.In post 1107, samantha97 wrote:there's 21 players, 13 roles, and most roles are just better for town than a silo, so even mafia would covet them
I guess it's possible something like radar wouldn't get picked but still, holding out to be 100% sure certain roles are present seems more of a paranoid mafia mindset
She made reads on the whole game.In post 1113, marry wrote:maybe i'm missing meta here but why mastina of all people, i'm looking at her iso and it's like normal to me. what are you so annoyed with, at least she made reads
Unfortunately for you I don't need your approval or your vote.In post 1115, Prism wrote:I don't see her as particularly annoying or intolerable this game. If you think she has more scum equity than usual, sure, but the idea we should preemptively policy her for gamehealth in a game where she is doing nothing wrong is disgusting to me.
I don't think it is a puzzle why I looked in previous treatments of the same player as a contrast in behavior. I explicitly found it scummy, and the response suggesting it is at least partially arbitrary, depending on your personal whim to extend mercy game to game, is not reassuring either way. I recognize that you provided a game-related reason for WH13.
What is the difference between Mastina's list and a random.org one.In post 1119, marry wrote:i... i don't vibe with this, i think you would likely be irritated if she had 'reasons' for all of it and wouldn't be satisfied with that either. it's NAI to me, and honestly i can kind of follow mastina's vague train of thought actuallyIn post 1114, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:She made reads on the whole game.In post 1113, marry wrote:maybe i'm missing meta here but why mastina of all people, i'm looking at her iso and it's like normal to me. what are you so annoyed with, at least she made reads
Where is the justification for those reads, Marry? Go on. Find them for me. Find the justification for a full reads list in Defcon 4.
I won't accept anyone being left out. 24 different people. She needs reasons for all of them. She gave reads on them all after all right?
PoggersIn post 1128, samantha97 wrote:random.org correctly placed me at the topIn post 1125, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:What is the difference between Mastina's list and a random.org one.
This is not an answer.In post 1132, marry wrote:i have no meta on mastina and nothing you've said has given me insight on what that is that you're referencing
her list might be based on tone + people communicating a lot. i tend to early-townlean people like this -- pooky, joqiza (and me, im right next to him, i can follow that logic bc of our interactions right?), merlot is high and i tone read her as town, where the skitter hydra is low and et al (people or... just pooky? were scumreading them, not sure if joke), and the ispers/replacements are low. it just seems like, idk, early observations during pregame. my home game does that all the time
these are early, but if i was forced to make a 'reads list' mine might look eerily similar basically
Because it's mafia. Or is your experience more hugs and laughter and everyone getting along?In post 1134, marry wrote:In post 1127, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Like actually marry. You want to get into this so we will get into this.
You say you follow Mastina's "vague logic".
Show me. Explain her reads as better than random.
why do you phrase this like we're fighting or i've taken a side or something
This is also not an answer.In post 1137, marry wrote:this isn't getting anywhere lolIn post 1136, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:This is not an answer.In post 1132, marry wrote:i have no meta on mastina and nothing you've said has given me insight on what that is that you're referencing
her list might be based on tone + people communicating a lot. i tend to early-townlean people like this -- pooky, joqiza (and me, im right next to him, i can follow that logic bc of our interactions right?), merlot is high and i tone read her as town, where the skitter hydra is low and et al (people or... just pooky? were scumreading them, not sure if joke), and the ispers/replacements are low. it just seems like, idk, early observations during pregame. my home game does that all the time
these are early, but if i was forced to make a 'reads list' mine might look eerily similar basically
This is "I have some similar reads on the townside so I think it is fine"!
What about her scum reads then?
I'm not calling Mastina scum for playstyle?In post 1142, Cephrir wrote:i don't know why you're trying to call mastina scum for playstyle when she is actually a little scummy imo for her content
also please let's not all claim before the game even starts thanks!
So first of all this is civil. I've not insulted you, I've not yelled at you. I've been forceful with questions. You don't get to decide what I am doing is uncivil. You can like it or not but that doesnt make a difference.In post 1147, marry wrote:my experience is civil discussion actually. i've tried to explain myself to you and you're taking it as a battle..? why is the pressure on me to answer your questions that i've answered as well as possible-- i don't know mastina, i'm not going to speak for her, i don't know exactly what she was thinking in her readslist. why has this suddenly turned into you scumreading me because i'm engaging with youIn post 1139, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Because it's mafia. OrIn post 1134, marry wrote:In post 1127, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Like actually marry. You want to get into this so we will get into this.
You say you follow Mastina's "vague logic".
Show me. Explain her reads as better than random.
why do you phrase this like we're fighting or i've taken a side or somethingis your experience more hugs and laughter and everyone getting along?
I am town and I suspect you are not so I am putting pressure on you to answer me
Agree. Ceph was chastizing for poisoning the mastina well potentially with a bad argument.In post 1153, The Church of Skitter wrote:Cephir’s actions don’t read to me that way at all
Explain how the vote change was pretty quick.In post 1156, VFP wrote:It's something I'll consider on a flip.In post 1153, The Church of Skitter wrote:Cephir’s actions don’t read to me that way at all
The vote change was pretty quick. I don't think a bus vote though, more like an opportunity.
But I'm okay with mastina as scum so Cephir will not have to threat today.
Yo same hat.In post 1158, The Church of Skitter wrote:If ur ok w/ mastina being scum vote it.
Why the fuck does everyone use LDD.In post 1162, VFP wrote:In post 1072, Cephrir wrote:I'm unsure what this means but am inspired anyway!In post 1064, DeasVail wrote:Also Cephrir we are damn well going to hallow this ground, just you watch!
VOTE: churchIn post 1088, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:vote: Mastina
Trust me guys. Something something 13 posts of garbage about meta and how certain I am Mastina is scum something something joining games with friends who won't kill me something something
Yeeting Mastina is good for the health of the game. Get her outta here. Dueces.@LDD
Oh really? Read as a joke cause DV seemed so... Not serious. I will need to read context.In post 1171, Cephrir wrote:oh, i actually didn't mean that vote as a joke, i have some mild heebie jeebies from church but have absolutely no reasoning for it whatsoever
Do you think me so arrogant that I can't concede worlds where I am wrong?In post 1176, VFP wrote:Ah yes, the RVS get out of jail card. Not the moment after vote of course.In post 1166, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Why the fuck does everyone use LDD.
It's
Lady
Lambda
Delta.
Anyway. What you have shown here is an RVS joke vote for pressurr purposes to respond to DV.
Then a real vote following my vote because they had a scum read there.
Do you see otherwise?
I already said what I see on a town flip. If you are so confident in a mastina scum flip then you should have no worry about how I see this vote.
Interesting.
Ye whatIn post 1183, marry wrote:LADYYYYYYYYYYY
Pooky don't make me invoke ghe 25th ammendment.In post 1185, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:AND I DONT CARE IF THIS MAKES ME SCUMMY OR WHATEVER
I JUST WANT TO LIVE LONG ENOUGH TO FIRE SOME NUKES
WHICH WE WOULD ALREADY BE DOING IF WE HADNT BEEN BETRAYED BY SOME COWARDS WHO WANT TO LET THE BADDIES SHOOT AT US BEFORE WE GET TO SHOOT AT THEM
When I nuke the rest of the cabinet I WILL BE HALF THE CABINETIn post 1188, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:LOLOLOLOL TWENTY FIFTH AMENDMENT REQUIRES HALF THE CABINET
BUT ILL VOTE HER ANYWAY CUZ I DONT REALLY CARE ABOUT WHO GETS ELIMINATED AND I DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT THE VOTE COUNT IS BUT I THINK SHE IS LEADING
VOTE: MASTINA
Big thonkIn post 1196, Save The Dragons wrote:i wonder why people don't do this in real lifeIn post 1193, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:When I nuke the rest of the cabinet I WILL BE HALF THE CABINETIn post 1188, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:LOLOLOLOL TWENTY FIFTH AMENDMENT REQUIRES HALF THE CABINET
BUT ILL VOTE HER ANYWAY CUZ I DONT REALLY CARE ABOUT WHO GETS ELIMINATED AND I DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT THE VOTE COUNT IS BUT I THINK SHE IS LEADING
VOTE: MASTINA
IF 24 HAS TAUGHT ME ANYTHING IT IS THAT EVERY PRESIDENT MUST HAVE AN UNRULY VP WHO THREATENS THE 25TH AMMENDMENTIn post 1197, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:THIS SOUNDS LIKE A COUP THREATIn post 1193, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:When I nuke the rest of the cabinet I WILL BE HALF THE CABINETIn post 1188, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:LOLOLOLOL TWENTY FIFTH AMENDMENT REQUIRES HALF THE CABINET
BUT ILL VOTE HER ANYWAY CUZ I DONT REALLY CARE ABOUT WHO GETS ELIMINATED AND I DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT THE VOTE COUNT IS BUT I THINK SHE IS LEADING
VOTE: MASTINA
I WOULD BE THREATENED BUT LIKE I ONLY CARE ABOUT TV RATINGS SO THIS SHOULD BE GOOD
I will go 3 layers deep so help me god.In post 1204, VFP wrote:I see it more as confidence than arrogance but I'm going to be biased here.In post 1180, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Do you think me so arrogant that I can't concede worlds where I am wrong?
Also logic doesn't work that way? Like. I can have a logical look forward without conceding my current beliefs or position.
And I find it fascinating that you seem to imply I can't have both.
You can have both confidence and doubt. Were you showing evidence of this? Nope. Are you now? Plausible.
Interesting that you find it fascinating though.
AhahahahhahahahaIn post 1207, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:IF I AM NIGHTKILLED, LLD BETTER BE POSTING VIDEOS OF HER USING AN OUIJIA BOARD TO COMMUNICATE WITH ME OR ELSE SHES A TRAITOR TO THE COUNTRY
you can't ping on this websiteIn post 1233, marry wrote:im gonna learn to ping one day
@joqiza ok bud hiiiiii do you think the way this table is reading mastina is similar to how we (EM in general) would read samp4palmer if he was to show up and do the same song and dance we know him for?
I was about to say "but et al isn't scum" but you were suggesting it so scum would vote thereIn post 1237, Nexus wrote:i'm also happy to do an et al counterwagon for teh lulz and see if we can't catch any of the buddies.
Oh and just a note for everyone in the game?In post 1284, Et Al wrote:Also, this feels like a good juncture to say: try very hard to not recall your nukes. If a claim would make you want to recall it, ask for the claim before you fire it. If someone goes incredibly obvtown after getting nuked, then it's justified, but make sure plenty of people agree with you that the reaction was obvtown. Otherwise you're just sacrificing town-controlled kills.
-S
okay since you claimed, i am now going to be forcing you to postIn post 1293, marry wrote:eavesdropper here guys. mafia said they like big butts? not really sure what to make of this, would really appreciate some help. more at 11.
yeIn post 1321, Save The Dragons wrote:is this what you are supposed to do in these games? speedlim to get to the nukes?
i didn't read this post until just now and i literally burst outIn post 1054, Cephrir wrote:Let me summarize for you
Joqiza: hi, I'm town
Pooky, nexus, and someone else I bet: et al is scum
Et al: nuh uh
LLD, probably some other people: mastina is scum
Mastina: Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.