In post 137, Loki Dokie wrote:Questioning that initial tl on them now. Town generally doesn’t vote a slot immediately after they express a tl on them. Are you actually scum here Flow?
Shouldn't it be the other way around, that scum would not want to alienate people who like them, and town wouldn't care?
In my experience no. Why should a townie be sus about a weak tl read on them? But scum has been quick to push me for that. I could obviously be wrong but it’s a really bad take regardless.
Maybe flow is scumreading you for reasons other than your town lean!
In post 137, Loki Dokie wrote:Questioning that initial tl on them now. Town generally doesn’t vote a slot immediately after they express a tl on them. Are you actually scum here Flow?
Town doesn't
usually
:
A. Lie
B. Choose who to defend not based on their scum reads
C. Act suspicious on purpose
In post 32, Andante wrote:hahahaha alright, time to kick back and watch the show... hey look Andante has 2 votes. Andante is in the lead!!!
That should be one of your bingo squares, it is on mine
VOTE: Vanderscamp
Oh, no! VOTE: flow trap
Pog, bingo square
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
In post 137, Loki Dokie wrote:Questioning that initial tl on them now. Town generally doesn’t vote a slot immediately after they express a tl on them. Are you actually scum here Flow?
Town doesn't
usually
:
A. Lie
B. Choose who to defend not based on their scum reads
C. Act suspicious on purpose
I don't do any of those things
Well you’re wrong.
No, I was lying as a joke
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
In post 137, Loki Dokie wrote:Questioning that initial tl on them now. Town generally doesn’t vote a slot immediately after they express a tl on them. Are you actually scum here Flow?
Shouldn't it be the other way around, that scum would not want to alienate people who like them, and town wouldn't care?
In my experience no. Why should a townie be sus about a weak tl read on them? But scum has been quick to push me for that. I could obviously be wrong but it’s a really bad take regardless.
Maybe flow is scumreading you for reasons other than your town lean!
No, I am not SRing them
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
In post 137, Loki Dokie wrote:Questioning that initial tl on them now. Town generally doesn’t vote a slot immediately after they express a tl on them. Are you actually scum here Flow?
Town doesn't
usually
:
A. Lie
B. Choose who to defend not based on their scum reads
C. Act suspicious on purpose
In post 131, Hopkirk wrote:what was the unintentional double meaning that i may not have spotted in my comment
Spill my tea could mean gossip and I could cover it up with my dry humour
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
Regarding mechanical stuff, I feel like we should not claim neighbor chats until someone flips D1, and then the partner of that person immediately claims that.
Then either all claim D2 or do the same as D1 if the partner of the flipped person dies.
I don't feel extremely strongly about this and am open to other thoughts.
I very possibly could be bad at reading you!
Maybe your playstyle as town is just to revolve the game around how people are reading you, I generally see this as a scum trait.
He could be scum? I don’t know. I think likely one between bugs and Scamp. Flow is just wrong but bugs is my best guess. I have seen nothing townie from them yet.
I very possibly could be bad at reading you!
Maybe your playstyle as town is just to revolve the game around how people are reading you, I generally see this as a scum trait.
That’s my town meta. Okay, I think I like my vote then.
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
He could be scum? I don’t know. I think likely one between bugs and Scamp. Flow is just wrong but bugs is my best guess. I have seen nothing townie from them yet.
i'm asking because this reaction reads as though you're assuming town Vander (bad at this would imply he's town) which felt different to your interaction with flow earlier
In post 161, Vanderscamp wrote:Regarding mechanical stuff, I feel like we should not claim neighbor chats until someone flips D1, and then the partner of that person immediately claims that.
Then either all claim D2 or do the same as D1 if the partner of the flipped person dies.
I don't feel extremely strongly about this and am open to other thoughts.
we avoid a d2 massclaim because of the friendly neighbour. optimal move changes based on what we hit d1.
He could be scum? I don’t know. I think likely one between bugs and Scamp. Flow is just wrong but bugs is my best guess. I have seen nothing townie from them yet.
i'm asking because this reaction reads as though you're assuming town Vander (bad at this would imply he's town) which felt different to your interaction with flow earlier
In post 161, Vanderscamp wrote:Regarding mechanical stuff, I feel like we should not claim neighbor chats until someone flips D1, and then the partner of that person immediately claims that.
Then either all claim D2 or do the same as D1 if the partner of the flipped person dies.
I don't feel extremely strongly about this and am open to other thoughts.
we avoid a d2 massclaim because of the friendly neighbour. optimal move changes based on what we hit d1.
I don’t know what anyone is but I feel pretty good with my vote. I don’t think this is town!bugs. First, they jump on Andante, then a non-poster than me. Where is the actual sorting in any of that?
so specifically the page 1 vote, what was the issue with it? Given part of your issue was 'first, they jump on Andante' i'm unclear what was bad about the jump on
He could be scum? I don’t know. I think likely one between bugs and Scamp. Flow is just wrong but bugs is my best guess. I have seen nothing townie from them yet.
i'm asking because this reaction reads as though you're assuming town Vander (bad at this would imply he's town) which felt different to your interaction with flow earlier
In post 161, Vanderscamp wrote:Regarding mechanical stuff, I feel like we should not claim neighbor chats until someone flips D1, and then the partner of that person immediately claims that.
Then either all claim D2 or do the same as D1 if the partner of the flipped person dies.
I don't feel extremely strongly about this and am open to other thoughts.
we avoid a d2 massclaim because of the friendly neighbour. optimal move changes based on what we hit d1.
I agree there's value in keeping the friendly neighbor hidden, but I'm doubtful that if two people from different neighborhoods get killed, we can get to N2 without scum having a very large amount of information about who is in which chats (without creating the opportunity for scum to lie about the chats and get away with it, which I am keen to avoid)
In post 171, Hopkirk wrote:so specifically the page 1 vote, what was the issue with it? Given part of your issue was 'first, they jump on Andante' i'm unclear what was bad about the jump on
It’s a combo of both the aggressive jumping on at least three players now, with not much explanation and them trying to direct the game. Town!bugs is far less likely to do that.