Oh my god Unwd. What a worthless content post. These posts don't lie Unwd!!In post 129, unwnd wrote:I get Ant vibes from Nero Cain's posting
He needs to assemble the troops to move pile of dirt ten inches
Caught as scum.
Oh my god Unwd. What a worthless content post. These posts don't lie Unwd!!In post 129, unwnd wrote:I get Ant vibes from Nero Cain's posting
He needs to assemble the troops to move pile of dirt ten inches
Not like I take pressure well.... someone pushed me, I gave up and claimed doc once...In post 1247, Save The Dragons wrote:i don't think you're taking pressure well. and instead of re-evaluating, you double down on your OMGUS vote.
Disagree!In post 1248, Dwlee99 wrote:This post is not good.In post 1229, Andante wrote:lol I don't even sr the person I'm voting right now
In post 1245, unwnd wrote:I think the content is worthless and your voting patterns aren't really great. You can prove me wrong instead of having a fit about it. I again told you the basis to dislike you is not "RVS" content rather what little has actually come of it. Again: Is there something in that paragraph that you didn't understand?
Farkran, my impression of you is that you're townreading basically everyone. Could you sum up who you think are most likely to be scum, if anyone?In post 1249, Farkran wrote:Also this is 100% town!norweeIn post 1242, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It is Unwd. And you're one of the more arrogant players i've met to think you've "caught me" because i made some light jokes in a game.
flow i love that you do this, i do the same thing.In post 1213, flow trap wrote:Memory issues
So not voting for your scum reads is good? Does Andante have a scum read? What has she done?In post 1252, flow trap wrote:Disagree!In post 1248, Dwlee99 wrote:This post is not good.In post 1229, Andante wrote:lol I don't even sr the person I'm voting right now
Also this??Andante wrote:Not like I take pressure well.... someone pushed me, I gave up and claimed doc once...In post 1247, Save The Dragons wrote:i don't think you're taking pressure well. and instead of re-evaluating, you double down on your OMGUS vote.
Do what?In post 1255, Chara wrote:flow i love that you do this, i do the same thing.In post 1213, flow trap wrote:Memory issues
What make it not good opposed to meh?In post 1248, Dwlee99 wrote:This post is not good.
Did I imagine it then? I could've sworn you did.In post 1231, Farkran wrote:Wait - i never talked about beeboy. That's one of the players that i didn't even read yet. I do remember people who said beeboy is known for hardlurking as scum, but i have never produced any read about them.In post 1178, unwnd wrote:Another aspect of it really is the fact I'm pretty sure Beeboy is not posting because he's scum. This is something I'm not really a fan of in general. It's exactly as Pooky said where it's reaching a trust tell and it has to be stopped. I will vote Beeboy every time under this pretense and if people don't see my own interpretations then they could at least have faith that this tell is truth. The people who are skirting around the issue at this point in a confbiased perspective are just potential mates who either A) pissed at him for flaking again B) trying to not lose a partner due to dumb shit. I don't really think all partners would assume the same thing and just tell me 'oh well maybe he's just busy' but I think Norwee and Farkran's response to it was the worst. Seriously Farkran how could you possibly townread Beeboy here for like two fucking posts lol. That immediately just tripped my alarms and Norwee is again playing to the whole latching on aspect.
I have never played with beeboy, so i would have to trust other people's read on him, and to trust those reads i have to trust the people first
Yes, yesIn post 1256, Dwlee99 wrote:So not voting for your scum reads is good? Does Andante have a scum read?
lol sometimes I ISO myself because I react in-the-moment and I have to figure out what I was thinking in the distant past of 4 hours ago.In post 1255, Chara wrote:flow i love that you do this, i do the same thing.In post 1213, flow trap wrote:Memory issues
In post 1256, Dwlee99 wrote:So not voting for your scum reads is good? Does Andante have a scum read? What has she done?In post 1252, flow trap wrote:Disagree!In post 1248, Dwlee99 wrote:This post is not good.In post 1229, Andante wrote:lol I don't even sr the person I'm voting right now
Also this??Andante wrote:Not like I take pressure well.... someone pushed me, I gave up and claimed doc once...In post 1247, Save The Dragons wrote:i don't think you're taking pressure well. and instead of re-evaluating, you double down on your OMGUS vote.
In post 1260, flow trap wrote:Yes, yesIn post 1256, Dwlee99 wrote:So not voting for your scum reads is good? Does Andante have a scum read?
So i need to prove to you my content is not worthless? What a waste of time.In post 1253, unwnd wrote:You can prove me wrong instead of having a fit about it.
You dislike that RVS content is not meaningful? Do you understand what RVS posting is? It means you are allowed to joke around.In post 1253, unwnd wrote:I again told you the basis to dislike you is not "RVS" content rather what little has actually come of it.
sorry, should have quoted more but i'm on mobile so quoting quotes is a pain.In post 1257, flow trap wrote:Do what?In post 1255, Chara wrote:flow i love that you do this, i do the same thing.In post 1213, flow trap wrote:Memory issues
"No fun allowed" - half this tableIn post 1265, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It means you are allowed to joke around.
Scum is here trying to look towny in this mess....In post 1269, flow trap wrote:Yeah (also what in the world is everyone talking about)
In post 1271, flow trap wrote:I phrased that weird ignore that