In post 525, yessiree wrote:VC
You didn't even do the last VC. The heck.In post 550, yessiree wrote:VC
In post 525, yessiree wrote:VC
You didn't even do the last VC. The heck.In post 550, yessiree wrote:VC
Conftown having a disproportionate influence on the lim is how conftown works, yes.In post 517, Klick wrote:(unless we're just agreeing that one there's confirmed town, they finalise any vote we make?)
From specifically my POV it’s easier to solve lovers mechanically, true. There are an equal number of townies (by the hydra logic) for which the exact opposite is true.In post 531, T-Bone wrote:It's only wrong if you're a VT or scum at this point.
FTFY. The only functional difference between your plans is that Ana has stated she wants to BoP vote Llama.In post 517, Klick wrote:One of these is a general method of successfully eliminating scum even if we miss the first time
The other is just suggesting we vote Llama
@TBone, I’d like to report a player in my game threatening LlamaFluff.In post 547, T-Bone wrote:Llama should be afraid of me though. O.O
You should be afraid of me to and not worry about threats to LlamaFluff or else O.OIn post 558, Bingle wrote:@TBone, I’d like to report a player in my game threatening LlamaFluff.In post 547, T-Bone wrote:Llama should be afraid of me though. O.O
Hm. Expand on this for me.In post 559, T-Bone wrote:And by coincidence from a scum lover PoV focusing on the VTs first is preferable. Your repeated "I only want to look at the VT pool" feels like an attempt to not put yourself in the spot where you need to survive two 1v1s with RM/Ana and then Klick/me, respectively.
Could you link examples for B and explain why you have the read you have?In post 561, T-Bone wrote:Also the person among the VTs I think is scum is the leading wagon so let's not pretend that A: I haven't thought about the VTs at all, B: that I haven't repeatedly voiced this read and C: that there's anything else I need to do there. What do you want me to do, argue with VV over my read of them?
@TBone, I’d like to report a player in my game trying to prevent me from reporting them for threatening LF. CheckmateIn post 560, T-Bone wrote:You should be afraid of me to and not worry about threats to LlamaFluff or else O.OIn post 558, Bingle wrote:@TBone, I’d like to report a player in my game threatening LlamaFluff.In post 547, T-Bone wrote:Llama should be afraid of me though. O.O
Sure. I will take all your reports and give them the longing consideration they deserve.In post 564, Bingle wrote:@TBone, I’d like to report a player in my game trying to prevent me from reporting them for threatening LF. CheckmateIn post 560, T-Bone wrote:You should be afraid of me to and not worry about threats to LlamaFluff or else O.OIn post 558, Bingle wrote:@TBone, I’d like to report a player in my game threatening LlamaFluff.In post 547, T-Bone wrote:Llama should be afraid of me though. O.O
How does prodding your for activity 'distract' people? If you don't post and vocal your options then they may be forgotten but the fact that i ask you to be active doesn't stop you in any way.In post 559, T-Bone wrote:I think Kerset is trying to distract from my (correct) reads by trying to use me not posting on Saturday as a way to shade me as a lurker, and by using my most recent convo with RM to distract you all from remembering that I think this is the scum pair.
I believe that he and he is scum and bye bye. I don't see the process of questioning, nothing aboutIn post 272, T-Bone wrote:I agree with nearly everything in this post....except that I will not avoid thinking that Bingle/Kerset is the scum pair, because at this point, they are the ones I believe are scum. I'm actually also leaning VV as the goon, but I don't feel as strongly atm.
i don't know if you can read bambi better than i can. i'm assuming you can because me and bambi's playstyle are very simliar.In post 482, LlamaFluff wrote:I think we are in the same ballpark but looking at things from somewhat different angles... so just let me know when I have your reasoning wrong:
You can read Bambi better than me
You have no read on Bambi
You do not want to go for a VT today
If you had to right now you would vote me over Bambi
Assuming all of that is true, when do you feel that you would be able to read Bambi?
Also an aside... change skin color when on an alt. That helped me in the past.
ana/rm is still town, and i'm sticking by this. rm is playing very similarly to last game, and they were town, so i'm going to assume this is town!rmIn post 493, LlamaFluff wrote:Awesome. So what is your opinion on the RM/Ana duo? Vex too for that matter.
In post 569, Kerset wrote:If you find my actions malicious then you probably also don't understand reasoning behind it, so here i go.
One of the *proper* tools to determine someones alignment is to observe their ability to gather information about worrying things and looking at reasoning behind reads (to see how much sense they make). The problem with you is that all you give me isI believe that he and he is scum and bye bye. I don't see the process of questioning, nothing aboutIn post 272, T-Bone wrote:I agree with nearly everything in this post....except that I will not avoid thinking that Bingle/Kerset is the scum pair, because at this point, they are the ones I believe are scum. I'm actually also leaning VV as the goon, but I don't feel as strongly atm.yourreasoning behind the reads. All things that scum struggle to fake in every game of mafia are hidden in your gameplay here.
btw that is the post where bone talked about VT
You grasp at silly things like activity and post count (like last game) because you don't have anything real because I am probably the most townie looking player in this game right now, I don't need 60 posts of nothing for that to be true.In post 567, Kerset wrote:How does prodding your for activity 'distract' people? If you don't post and vocal your options then they may be forgotten but the fact that i ask you to be active doesn't stop you in any way.In post 559, T-Bone wrote:I think Kerset is trying to distract from my (correct) reads by trying to use me not posting on Saturday as a way to shade me as a lurker, and by using my most recent convo with RM to distract you all from remembering that I think this is the scum pair.
Both you and Klick are at the bottom of post count. You are objectively the least interactive players. Today you added 13 posts, so at the time of my actions your gap was even higher.
Instead of crafting conspiracy theories just look at the data.