Open 811 - Lovers and Losers (New Game+) [Game Over]

ISO · Post Post #1125 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 1:34 pm

Also... that doesn't even make any sense. Hard defending your partner is the dumbest possible strategy in this setup, considering scum only need to win one minigame to win.

yessiree · Post Post #1126 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 1:39 pm

VC 1.33

With 9 votes, it takes 5 to eliminate

Something_Smart (4)

- Bingle, LlamaFluff, Bambi Jay, T-Bone

Bambi Jay (2)

- Kerset, RationalMadman

Anastasia (1)

- VFP

Bingle (1)

- Something_Smart

LlamaFluff (1)

- Anastasia

Note Voting -

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-05-25 22:00:00)

Bambi Jay · Post Post #1127 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 1:45 pm

In post 1125, Something_Smart wrote:Also... that doesn't even make any sense. Hard defending your partner is the dumbest possible strategy in this setup, considering scum only need to win one minigame to win.

Well yeah. If 3 people work together to make sure they win 1 of the groups it's GG. So going hard defense is valid if your going for a nice double elim win.

ISO · Post Post #1128 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 1:46 pm

How is that possibly viable from the POV of me/Ana/RM, though? Like with all the pressure on me am I really getting both Llama and you killed?

Bambi Jay · Post Post #1129 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 1:52 pm

Well I can't speak for you but I guess that's what Vex tried. You just replaced into a bad position.

RationalMadman · Post Post #1130 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 2:39 pm

In post 1124, Something_Smart wrote:So why not vote him first?

This is a very strange response. Bambi did vote me, so what are you asking?

RationalMadman · Post Post #1131 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 2:41 pm

In post 1125, Something_Smart wrote:Also... that doesn't even make any sense. Hard defending your partner is the dumbest possible strategy in this setup, considering scum only need to win one minigame to win.

The way that people are grouping my pair and you indeed makes no sense at all for this reason. It's also why I find it irksome that both pairs seem opposed to consider bussing and intentional distancing as factors.

ISO · Post Post #1132 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 3:15 pm

In post 1124, Something_Smart wrote:So why not vote him first?

I mean, that was just tried....we literally tried with all three lovers pairs over the course of this game. This is not the provocative statement maybe you envisioned it to be?

yessiree · Post Post #1133 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 3:19 pm

In post 1090, Kerset wrote:
@mod can i let my lover move my vote in case i am unavailable?

No you cannot.

Bambi Jay · Post Post #1134 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 3:27 pm

In post 1132, T-Bone wrote:
In post 1124, Something_Smart wrote:So why not vote him first?
I mean, that was just tried....we literally tried with all three lovers pairs over the course of this game. This is not the provocative statement maybe you envisioned it to be?

Seems like a flail.

So we're certain VFP will hammer right? Cuz otherwise I guess we run out the clock for plurality.

Bambi Jay · Post Post #1135 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 3:34 pm

Also whoever asked for an extra 2 days you got Smart killed instead of Ration and Ana funnily enough. All cuz we had more time, so Smart dies.

Bambi Jay · Post Post #1136 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 3:35 pm

In post 838, yessiree wrote:
In post 814, LlamaFluff wrote:@mod - Can we get an extension? We just replaced almost a third of the game and now have under 48 hours to deadline with weekend when a lot of people disappear coming up.

Sure, adding 48 hours to current deadline.

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-05-25 22:00:00)

Oh it was Llama. That's kinda funny.

RationalMadman · Post Post #1137 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 3:45 pm

In post 1135, Bambi Jay wrote:Also whoever asked for an extra 2 days you got Smart killed instead of Ration and Ana funnily enough. All cuz we had more time, so Smart dies.

Why is it funny?

Bambi Jay · Post Post #1138 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 3:50 pm

Because you owe your life to overtime and ironically it's being used to elim your appearant top townread as well. It's funny to me atleast

LlamaFluff · Post Post #1139 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 3:55 pm

I think its just a bit interesting because it moved death from the only pair I have no town read on to biggest scum read... right now im at something like

Town: Bingle
Lean Town: VFP
Null: Bambi, TBone, RM (in order)
Lean Scum: Kerset
Scum: Ana, SS

ISO · Post Post #1140 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:05 pm

In post 1132, T-Bone wrote:I mean, that was just tried....we literally tried with all three lovers pairs over the course of this game. This is not the provocative statement maybe you envisioned it to be?

Well, I'm just confused why it was abandoned. It's plurality voting, it's not as though inability to get a majority was a problem.

ISO · Post Post #1141 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:10 pm

I think my money's on Llama scum, though I'm not terribly confident in that. I don't see what scum-Bambi expects to gain by continuing to argue I'm scum.

LlamaFluff · Post Post #1142 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:20 pm

In post 1141, Something_Smart wrote:I think my money's on Llama scum, though I'm not terribly confident in that. I don't see what scum-Bambi expects to gain by continuing to argue I'm scum.

Probably because of the scenario that happens if you vote him... which why arent you really?

RationalMadman · Post Post #1143 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:38 pm

In post 1142, LlamaFluff wrote:
In post 1141, Something_Smart wrote:I think my money's on Llama scum, though I'm not terribly confident in that. I don't see what scum-Bambi expects to gain by continuing to argue I'm scum.
Probably because of the scenario that happens if you vote him... which why arent you really?

Isn't Bambi a 'her'?

I saw you do this before with someone else I think hut it may have been last game.

RationalMadman · Post Post #1144 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:43 pm

In post 1140, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 1132, T-Bone wrote:I mean, that was just tried....we literally tried with all three lovers pairs over the course of this game. This is not the provocative statement maybe you envisioned it to be?
Well, I'm just confused why it was abandoned. It's plurality voting, it's not as though inability to get a majority was a problem.

If you wanted to hammer on me, the time is up but if you are Town, which I believe you are, it was a great hesitation even though it ended this way. I am Town.

You should out as many reads as you can.

You believe the team to be Llama, Kerset and Bingle correct?

That team is certainly viable but I find Tbone and VFP to be too scummy, they invented reasons to scum read me and backed away now that you became viable, that tells me enough. Nonetheless, Llama, Tbone and VFP is also viable and this is why you being elimimated is terrible as you're the only vanilla claim I firmly see as Town and you being alive assists the solve for me a lot.

RationalMadman · Post Post #1145 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:44 pm

If S_S were scum here, he'd not be saying what he's saying. He is Town. It is absolutely blatant to me. He even dumbtold that he forgot I was voted.

RationalMadman · Post Post #1146 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:44 pm

Ana change to Bambi please.

ISO · Post Post #1147 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:48 pm

In post 1144, RationalMadman wrote:You believe the team to be Llama, Kerset and Bingle correct?

I guess yeah? Not really confident in that though...

ISO · Post Post #1148 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:50 pm

VOTE: Bambi I guess. Not thrilled with this but it is what it is.

RationalMadman · Post Post #1149 (ISO) » Mon May 24, 2021 4:50 pm

In post 1147, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 1144, RationalMadman wrote:You believe the team to be Llama, Kerset and Bingle correct?
I guess yeah? Not really confident in that though...

Then I have misunderstood your reads, what are your reads?