I still like the idea of an Andre Ico scum theatre team...but I know this is my bias for non-boring teams.
@Uneven what about those interactions makes Andre seem towny to you?
i don't townread ta vera incredibly strongly, i think it just so happens that a lot of my posting has been in defense of her. i do lean town on her though, so i'll try to compile some reasons.
In post 650, Moongrass wrote:@Uneven what about those interactions makes Andre seem towny to you?
I think mostly that they made sense and there was an order to the progression. Most town just do that because of how they process the game but mafia have to compile and it didn't feel compiled to me.
In post 644, northsidegal wrote:funnily enough i think that i agree mostly with 543, i think mine is {nsg, uneven, ta vera, SS, sigmund}
NSG I’m not going to lie - I think this is somewhat of a crappy coalition. I don’t know that I would have S_S as high as you do, or nearly enough to include in a “coalition”. And I’m also a bit confused as to why you seem so intent to misread some of my thinking, but that’s a bit self-centered I suppose.
In post 644, northsidegal wrote:funnily enough i think that i agree mostly with 543, i think mine is {nsg, uneven, ta vera, SS, sigmund}
NSG I’m not going to lie - I think this is somewhat of a crappy coalition. I don’t know that I would have S_S as high as you do, or nearly enough to include in a “coalition”. And I’m also a bit confused as to why you seem so intent to misread some of my thinking, but that’s a bit self-centered I suppose.
could you elaborate on what you mean by / where you see instances of my misreading your thinking?
Instead of “misreading my thinking” I suppose I should have said “thought my contributions were relevant and positive, but don’t think I deserve to be TR”. Particularly over S_S who I felt shied away from a fight with Sigmund in a rather timid and somewhat Scummy way. If I may say so. Like Sigmund’s points around that I felt were spot on.
In post 649, northsidegal wrote:In post 648, UneveN wrote:
In post 647, northsidegal wrote:
andres is a bit of a surprising inclusion.
I liked his content with regards to Iconeum.
fair. i can even see where you're coming from and maybe even agree, actually.
You agree with how I’m looking at Iconeum, but you’re surprised another player might include me in their Town pool? I just didn’t get that at all.
you're confusing the chronology there. i was confused uneven included you, uneven gave the reason, then i said that i agreed that your progression on iconeum was good. this is also—to my memory—the only instance that i've even really talked about you or your contributions, so i don't think there's anything else you could possibly be referring to in 660 when you say i thought your contributions were good but not worthy of being townread than this.
In post 650, Moongrass wrote:I still like the idea of an Andre Ico scum theatre team...but I know this is my bias for non-boring teams.
@Uneven what about those interactions makes Andre seem towny to you?
Look I’ll give it to you straight - if Ico and I were aligned, I let Ico take on a lot of heat, push people loudly, and stay out of it. Knowing how they play as both alignments, I know they like to get down and dirty as Scum, and can be super loud and convincing as Town. I see no need in trying to fake a fight D1 with them unless I really felt there was a need. And since the wagon is mostly being pushed by me, what need is there?
In post 660, Andresvmb wrote:Instead of “misreading my thinking” I suppose I should have said “thought my contributions were relevant and positive, but don’t think I deserve to be TR”. Particularly over S_S who I felt shied away from a fight with Sigmund in a rather timid and somewhat Scummy way. If I may say so. Like Sigmund’s points around that I felt were spot on.
TRUE
SS BACK TO PRETENDING HES A TREE EVER SINCE I STOPPED SLAPPING HIM WITH MY SWORD
In post 661, northsidegal wrote:you're confusing the chronology there. i was confused uneven included you, uneven gave the reason, then i said that i agreed that your progression on iconeum was good. this is also—to my memory—the only instance that i've even really talked about you or your contributions, so i don't think there's anything else you could possibly be referring to in 660 when you say i thought your contributions were good but not worthy of being townread than this.
Perhaps that me reading backwards when catching up. But I’ll say this - I think you should be able to read me properly here. Do you think I’m Scum?
In post 661, northsidegal wrote:you're confusing the chronology there. i was confused uneven included you, uneven gave the reason, then i said that i agreed that your progression on iconeum was good. this is also—to my memory—the only instance that i've even really talked about you or your contributions, so i don't think there's anything else you could possibly be referring to in 660 when you say i thought your contributions were good but not worthy of being townread than this.
Perhaps that me reading backwards when catching up. But I’ll say this - I think you should be able to read me properly here. Do you think I’m Scum?
let me answer your question with a few questions, hopefully this isn't annoying.
do you have some unique confidence that i should be able to read you, or is that more of a general statement of faith in my ability (as well as my alignment)? if it's the first, why? as i said elsewhere, i think you said we played together before but i can't seem to recall or find whatever game that might have been.
do you think that i scumread you?
do you think that you have objectively played in a towny manner this game or have otherwise specifically played your towngame? if so, what parts of your play this game so far characterizes that?
In post 650, Moongrass wrote:I still like the idea of an Andre Ico scum theatre team...but I know this is my bias for non-boring teams.
@Uneven what about those interactions makes Andre seem towny to you?
Look I’ll give it to you straight - if Ico and I were aligned, I let Ico take on a lot of heat, push people loudly, and stay out of it. Knowing how they play as both alignments, I know they like to get down and dirty as Scum, and can be super loud and convincing as Town. I see no need in trying to fake a fight D1 with them unless I really felt there was a need. And since the wagon is mostly being pushed by me, what need is there?
And to back this up, look at Ico’s reaction once I start SR’ing their slot (they were Scum): viewtopic.php?p=12680887#p12680887. They’re perfectly happy to engage in fights and go hard against folks pushing their slot. Just keep that in mind.
In post 665, northsidegal wrote:let me answer your question with a few questions, hopefully this isn't annoying.
do you have some unique confidence that i should be able to read you, or is that more of a general statement of faith in my ability (as well as my alignment)? if it's the first, why? as i said elsewhere, i think you said we played together before but i can't seem to recall or find whatever game that might have been.
In post 598, northsidegal wrote:been busy, might be busy for the rest of today (irl, not today in-game)
In post 580, Moongrass wrote:I will say that I do like your push on nsg. I don't see scum doing that if nsg is town as they can just conveniently dispose of her N1 with no one questioning that NK.
i would say that you overestimate the amount of people in this playerlist who know who i am and how much the scumteam even ought to fear me, but given even sigmund seems to know me perhaps it's more people in the playerlist than i realized. (although that second part still might be overestimated, i am quite rusty.)
In post 665, northsidegal wrote:do you think that you have objectively played in a towny manner this game or have otherwise specifically played your towngame? if so, what parts of your play this game so far characterizes that?
I haven’t been all that Towny perhaps, but I do think there’s some hallmarks of my Town play. If you see me care somewhat intensely about how folks are reading me, then yeah, that’s Town me. Go cross-check with other games, since I don’t expect to be taken at face value here when you aren’t sure of my alignment.
I’ve tried minimizing the amount of times I use words like this, but for some reason I haven’t been able to. I find myself saying “to be honest” a lot in games and it’s not particularly helpful.
In post 665, northsidegal wrote:let me answer your question with a few questions, hopefully this isn't annoying.
do you have some unique confidence that i should be able to read you, or is that more of a general statement of faith in my ability (as well as my alignment)? if it's the first, why? as i said elsewhere, i think you said we played together before but i can't seem to recall or find whatever game that might have been.
yeah, i guess i'm getting old. it's weird, i still feel like a newbie but now sometimes i'm among the oldest players in a playerlist, and i would be the equivalent of a 2013-er when i joined in 2017 (if my math is right). weird.