Mini Normal 2214 || Game Over!

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #725 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 12:58 pm

I mean #720

shiki · Post Post #726 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 12:59 pm

In post 722, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 720, shiki wrote:yeah i don't find it all that different from you trying to say i am potentially jake's partner simply because i haven't agreed with this specific post you made
if you would elaborate this more, I would like to hear it.

you say i 'omitted' critical things that i read and didn't agree with your view of and therefore i might be jake's partner

jake says you might be mafia because refusing to answer questions while under pressure that you disagreed with

shiki · Post Post #727 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 12:59 pm

they just feel like similar thought processes to me.

NotAHecticAlt · Post Post #728 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 12:59 pm

In post 721, humaneatingmonkey wrote:shiki, what are you doing? you are misframing me. i think you are potentially jake's partner because you have omitted some critical things about his wagon from your read on him that you have not made a comment on, and now i'm forcing you to comment on it and I didn't think I had to.

At this point i'm not as sure and feel as though shiki could be scum that is trying to take advantage of Jake suspicion and is scum themselves and trying to distance away from the wagon and get towncred from it and then push people such as myself later to chain mislims.

NotAHecticAlt · Post Post #729 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:00 pm

I'd say that Jake misrepresenting monkey and their uncharitableness towards the slot counts as critical information, especially when it's been brought up at least twice now.

shiki · Post Post #730 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:00 pm

In post 724, humaneatingmonkey wrote:it reads like chainsaw defense, and why wouldn't I read it like that?

??? doesn't a chainsaw defense have to involve me thinking you are mafia? which i do not

Anya · Post Post #731 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:00 pm

shiki is a shining river filled with cities

NotAHecticAlt · Post Post #732 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:00 pm

UNVOTE:

no quickhammers on my watch

shiki · Post Post #733 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:01 pm

In post 728, NotAHecticAlt wrote:At this point i'm not as sure and feel as though shiki could be scum that is trying to take advantage of Jake suspicion and is scum themselves and trying to distance away from the wagon and get towncred from it and then push people such as myself later to chain mislims.

ah yes have you tried applying the thing you applied to johnny for some reason to me

shiki · Post Post #734 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:01 pm

In post 733, shiki wrote:
In post 728, NotAHecticAlt wrote:At this point i'm not as sure and feel as though shiki could be scum that is trying to take advantage of Jake suspicion and is scum themselves and trying to distance away from the wagon and get towncred from it and then push people such as myself later to chain mislims.
ah yes have you tried applying the thing you applied to johnny for some reason to me

the uh 'scumrange'

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #735 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:02 pm

you didn't mention that Jake's question was "make a case why you're town". do you think this was a valid question to sort someone?

Anya · Post Post #736 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:02 pm

In post 581, T3 wrote:VOTE: Jake.
I reread their iso and didn't like the behavior aroundthe Anya wagon at all. Like it almost felt like a fakrsolve to get towncred.

did people miss T4 painting themselves with red paint here

Anya · Post Post #737 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:03 pm

the survival guide vote that doesn't admit it's one and gives made up reasons instead is always a creature of the night

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #738 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:03 pm

In post 726, shiki wrote:you say i 'omitted' critical things that i read and didn't agree with your view of and therefore i might be jake's partner

you can quote me, because I said what I really meant not far from this post. i didn't care that you disagreed with it, just that it was never mentioned. and then I had to do this to understand what you thought about it.

shiki · Post Post #739 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:04 pm

In post 735, humaneatingmonkey wrote:you didn't mention that Jake's question was "make a case why you're town". do you think this was a valid question to sort someone?

not a useful one. but do you think jake as town only asks valid questions? if so, could you explain why

shiki · Post Post #740 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:04 pm

In post 738, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 726, shiki wrote:you say i 'omitted' critical things that i read and didn't agree with your view of and therefore i might be jake's partner
you can quote me, because I said what I really meant not far from this post. i didn't care that you disagreed with it, just that it was never mentioned. and then I had to do this to understand what you thought about it.

yeah i get that you run at people i've played with you before why did you think i thought you were mafia for it though???

shiki · Post Post #741 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:07 pm

In post 738, humaneatingmonkey wrote:and then I had to do this to understand what you thought about it.

but also you can just ask me specifically what you want to know. you do not have to pressure me and decide i am mafia for not commenting on something. takes less pages.

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #742 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:11 pm

In post 730, shiki wrote:??? doesn't a chainsaw defense have to involve me thinking you are mafia? which i do not

i will make things clear, so that we do not misunderstand each other.

i thought your Jake town read omits the circumstances of my wagon and dismisses the wagon as "Jake was doing things that can seem like towncred-grabbing" when i was still waiting on your comment on the other thing. and now, you are seemingly crossed while we talk about it. it seemed like your reason for town-reading him and defending him was shallow, which makes me question your association.

now that you've clarified and shed light on what you thought about the circumstances of my wagon, i still don't understand it but I have to process it.

NotAHecticAlt · Post Post #743 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:12 pm

In post 734, shiki wrote:
In post 733, shiki wrote:
In post 728, NotAHecticAlt wrote:At this point i'm not as sure and feel as though shiki could be scum that is trying to take advantage of Jake suspicion and is scum themselves and trying to distance away from the wagon and get towncred from it and then push people such as myself later to chain mislims.
ah yes have you tried applying the thing you applied to johnny for some reason to me
the uh 'scumrange'

Are you outside of your own scumrange?

Can you clarify if you think this is the case?

shiki · Post Post #744 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:12 pm

In post 711, shiki wrote:
In post 709, NotAHecticAlt wrote:I never said t3 more likely scum

In post 479, NotAHecticAlt wrote:Jake + T3 are firmly in my scumread at this point. T3 moreso because of the associative with Jake here. I've explained already these 2.
what does moreso mean here then?

shiki · Post Post #745 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:14 pm

In post 743, NotAHecticAlt wrote:
In post 734, shiki wrote:
In post 733, shiki wrote:
In post 728, NotAHecticAlt wrote:At this point i'm not as sure and feel as though shiki could be scum that is trying to take advantage of Jake suspicion and is scum themselves and trying to distance away from the wagon and get towncred from it and then push people such as myself later to chain mislims.
ah yes have you tried applying the thing you applied to johnny for some reason to me
the uh 'scumrange'
Are you outside of your own scumrange?

Can you clarify if you think this is the case?

i do not know, honestly. i do not think of things in that sense. i was more trying to say that it felt very out of place the difference in how you are approaching me here vs johnny.

NotAHecticAlt · Post Post #746 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:14 pm

it means that my T3 read is more of a preflip read rather than independently scummy.

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #747 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:14 pm

In post 741, shiki wrote:but also you can just ask me specifically what you want to know. you do not have to pressure me and decide i am mafia for not commenting on something. takes less pages.

i did ask you what I want to know. more than that, I told you what I felt about you and why I was asking it.

You felt pressure, but I do not know why.

shiki · Post Post #748 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:16 pm

In post 742, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i thought your Jake town read omits the circumstances of my wagon and dismisses the wagon as "Jake was doing things that can seem like towncred-grabbing" when i was still waiting on your comment on the other thing. and now, you are seemingly crossed while we talk about it. it seemed like your reason for town-reading him and defending him was shallow, which makes me question your association.

i am not crossed i simply become frustrated when it is a bunch of posts that just seem like an issue in communication that could simply be solved by you having asked about the circumstances of your wagon. which i know is my own fault for having caused the miscommunication in the first place as i was talking about why i thought jake was potentially scummy not why you thought jake was potentially scummy there.

humaneatingmonkey · Post Post #749 (ISO) » Mon May 31, 2021 1:17 pm

In post 728, NotAHecticAlt wrote:At this point i'm not as sure and feel as though shiki could be scum that is trying to take advantage of Jake suspicion and is scum themselves and trying to distance away from the wagon and get towncred from it and then push people such as myself later to chain mislims.

so you don't think she would position herself like this as town?