Mini Normal 2214 || Game Over!

Sigmund · Post Post #1125 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 9:23 am

a lot of sheeple in this game

big fat power vacuum for them to run their mouth

shiki · Post Post #1126 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 9:29 am

In post 963, shiki wrote:
In post 924, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I believe Johnny that we shouldn't elim T3 for reasons also
so you believe we should not eliminate t3 for 'reasons', not hectic believes johnny is town for 'reasons', and johnny is now maybe reevaluating with regards to t3

sigmund and i just finished a game with northsidegal, at the end of which see said the following about 'reasons':

In post 1215, northsidegal wrote:as a side note (and to sort of continue what i said a bit earlier), i think this is final confirmation for me that i should almost always try to ignore ~reasons~, by which i mean i should never ever take thinking someone is a power role as an excuse to avoid reading them. in this case it didn't really turn out to hurt me, but the fact that i didn't update on what should have been an obvious fact for a while just because i saw the traffic analyst crumb and filed uneven away is definitely a mistake. in previous games i haven't been so lucky, and people i've ignored because of thinking that they must be a power role turned out to be scum.

which is the stance i am adopting towards these reads

shiki · Post Post #1127 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 9:30 am

In post 1077, T3 wrote:Oh-that was just a phrase, not a claim.

...

are you a traitor?

shiki · Post Post #1128 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 9:31 am

In post 1126, shiki wrote:see

*she

shiki · Post Post #1129 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 9:42 am

In post 1127, shiki wrote:
In post 1077, T3 wrote:Oh-that was just a phrase, not a claim.
...

are you a traitor?

this is the phrase being referred to here:

In post 1037, T3 wrote:Look either this is scum grand conspiracy where everyone in the neighborhood is scum or johhny and hectic are correct town.

T3 · Post Post #1130 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 10:05 am

In post 1127, shiki wrote:
In post 1077, T3 wrote:Oh-that was just a phrase, not a claim.
...

are you a traitor?

no.......?

shiki · Post Post #1131 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 10:08 am

In post 1130, T3 wrote:no.......?

could you explain what you meant by nieghbourhood in 1037 and also how you determined that johnny and not hectic are either scum with you(?) or town?

T3 · Post Post #1132 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 10:11 am

Wow I'm really bad at softing neighbor LOL.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1133 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 10:12 am

It isn't a soft if you just said it and then when asked deny it. Why was this neighborhood not claimed day one? Isn't that standard play?

T3 · Post Post #1134 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 10:46 am

I don't want to say why.

shiki · Post Post #1135 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 10:51 am

information is good for town, especially if it is information from a neighbourhood as the odds that the mafia already have it are significantly greater than random

T3 · Post Post #1136 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 10:53 am

You'll see soon.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1137 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 10:58 am

I hope it is a day vigilante

shiki · Post Post #1138 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:02 am

In post 1137, Dwlee99 wrote:I hope it is a day vigilante

thinking about the potential for a vigilante and also suggesting no elimination very interesting

Rae · Post Post #1139 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:17 am

dwlee i saw ur comment. i went with my gut instinct and didn't feel like i needed to respond further than that. im doing so out of the kindness of my heart

also im fucking bored. i claim pr.

Rae · Post Post #1140 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:17 am

this is why i was telling u that there was no reason to worry about me. i resolve myself.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1141 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:19 am

Rae, wtf.

In post 1138, shiki wrote:
In post 1137, Dwlee99 wrote:I hope it is a day vigilante
thinking about the potential for a vigilante and also suggesting no elimination very interesting

I went into this game suspecting a vig cause 12p and then no one got shot

shiki · Post Post #1142 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:21 am

In post 1141, Dwlee99 wrote:I went into this game suspecting a vig cause 12p and then no one got shot

right but if there is a vigilante wouldn't a no elimination be a very bad idea?

shiki · Post Post #1143 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:22 am

In post 1142, shiki wrote:right but if there is a vigilante wouldn't a no elimination be a very bad idea?

so you being aware of potential vigilante and suggesting no elimination is pretty ???

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1144 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:23 am

As an addendum, I suspected vigilante when I saw it was 9:3, cause I thought there would be an SK when joining.

shiki wrote:
In post 1141, Dwlee99 wrote:I went into this game suspecting a vig cause 12p and then no one got shot
right but if there is a vigilante wouldn't a no elimination be a very bad idea?

Vig should have shot last night to get us off even. It's possible vig no shot but they should have.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1145 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:24 am

This is also why I asked if no elims was crazy, cause I was wondering if other people thought there was one. Not committed to the idea.

shiki · Post Post #1146 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:26 am

In post 1144, Dwlee99 wrote:Vig should have shot last night to get us off even. It's possible vig no shot but they should have.

could also be a n2 or loyal or something there are a lot of possibilities it just feels like an incongruent thought process for you to have suggested the no elimination with this awareness

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1147 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:27 am

Suggestion is a very strong word for floating the idea to gauge reactions, which no one did til now.

shiki · Post Post #1148 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:27 am

In post 1147, Dwlee99 wrote:Suggestion is a very strong word for floating the idea to gauge reactions, which no one did til now.

i guess to me the way you asked about it made it seem like you were in favour of it

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1149 (ISO) » Fri Jun 04, 2021 12:24 pm

In post 1136, T3 wrote:You'll see soon.

When is this