Newbie 2066: Gelato 2 -- End!
-
-
GuyInFreezer Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Posts: 18127
- Joined: January 23, 2013
- Location: In your wall
pagetopShow"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae-
-
GuyInFreezer Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Posts: 18127
- Joined: January 23, 2013
- Location: In your wall
Please do not "meta" with sample size of only one game.In post 270, Roden wrote:Though, T3 does have a very distinct meta; my only other completed game also had T3 in it and he got caught through meta on page 1. GIF's statement that T3 is an oddball adds up with what I know. He makes bizarre plays as scum and distances himself hard from a scum buddy, and tends to sacrifice himself Day 1 too.Show"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae-
-
GuyInFreezer Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Posts: 18127
- Joined: January 23, 2013
- Location: In your wall
My reads are pretty accurate most of the time actually.In post 273, sang froid wrote:GIF occasionally has decent reads
There are plenty of reasons to scumread Vax but this ain't it. Former is actually more of a townleaning move and randomly claming obvtown was a fad that existed (still exists? I dunno I took a long break and just came back) back then.In post 273, sang froid wrote:vax's attempts to spin 116 as being a townslip or as being strongly +town hits me as wrong, as does the assertion that he's obvtown from a page agoShow"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae-
-
Roden He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Sorry, I should've clarified that four other games were analyzed to get the scum read on T3 in that game, so it's really a sample size of five. It's what convinced me to look for his tells here, since I was skeptical until it turned out that meta read easily won the game for town.In post 276, GuyInFreezer wrote:
Please do not "meta" with sample size of only one game.In post 270, Roden wrote:Though, T3 does have a very distinct meta; my only other completed game also had T3 in it and he got caught through meta on page 1. GIF's statement that T3 is an oddball adds up with what I know. He makes bizarre plays as scum and distances himself hard from a scum buddy, and tends to sacrifice himself Day 1 too.
What locked T3 as town for you?
I actually kinda agree with Sang here. Vax sounds frustrated that his town slip wasn't convincing enough. I don't think town would react that way, but scum likely would.In post 277, GuyInFreezer wrote:
My reads are pretty accurate most of the time actually.In post 273, sang froid wrote:GIF occasionally has decent reads
There are plenty of reasons to scumread Vax but this ain't it. Former is actually more of a townleaning move and randomly claming obvtown was a fad that existed (still exists? I dunno I took a long break and just came back) back then.In post 273, sang froid wrote:vax's attempts to spin 116 as being a townslip or as being strongly +town hits me as wrong, as does the assertion that he's obvtown from a page ago-
-
GuyInFreezer Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Posts: 18127
- Joined: January 23, 2013
- Location: In your wall
Plays too weird to be scum + 4D chess.In post 278, Roden wrote:What locked T3 as town for you?
Some reads are just this simple.
Oh some defo do. See, there is this fancy thing called "town bias." Sometimes town fails to mentally grasp the concept that some things are done as scum/not as town because the thought that they are town is so drilled in their head. It's like a confirmation bias, but a bias that comes because they're town thus they cannot be scum. I think the way he reacted is kinda showing this. Now I said "townlean" because yes scum can obviously do this so it's not a strong tell. Arguably it's kinda hard to explain this because it's tied to my perception of ppl's emotion when making a post and if ppl go "I disagree" I can't really do jack about that. tl;dr the act itself sucks but I don't think the way he did it is scummy.In post 278, Roden wrote:I don't think town would react that wayShow"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae-
-
GuyInFreezer Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Posts: 18127
- Joined: January 23, 2013
- Location: In your wall
So yeah my T3 read is really for his posts in general.
I just don't think scum plays the way he does.Show"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae-
-
NotAJumbleOfNumbers Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 691
- Joined: April 30, 2018
I'll just post my entire readslist as of now:In post 270, Roden wrote:Since you haven't voted yet, what's your opinion on the current game state? Between Vax, GIF, and Rock, who's coming off most town to you?
(Town)
Roden
GIF / Clasko
Sang
Johnny
T3
Rockhopper
Vaxkiller
(Mafia)
I'm going to be focusing on the three you wanted me to talk about:
We start from the top: GIF. I was kinda worried that their confident push for 5 TRs was just a ploy to sneak through the other scum and immediately back down, but they seem to have held on their reads, with rather great explanations to boot. And no, it's not because they townread me.
Next up: Rockhopper. I just don't see a lot of proaction in this slot. There are too many questions and not enough answers and reads. On top of that, there doesn't seem to be a lot of direction in their posts. Feels like a "trying to find something to criticize for the sake of it" kind of play.
@RockhopperDo you have a readslist? Could you explain some of the choices?
And finally: Vaxkiller. He was already pretty bad to begin with (see #243) but his insistence on the only kind of maybe towny thing he did (#116) being towny only dug him deeper in my mind. Not so much that he tried to defend it, but he was all "c'mon everyone knows this is obvtown" when it clearly wasn't. Look, not everything you say will look towny. You just have to make the towny parts outshine the scummy parts to look towny as a whole.
VOTE: Vaxkiller E-1
PSA: USE YOUR BOOKMARKS-
-
Rockhopper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: June 17, 2019
In post 281, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:@RockhopperDo you have a readslist? Could you explain some of the choices?Jumble
GIF
T3
Johnny
sang
Roden:Spoiler:
Vaxkiller
Clasko
Gun to head solve: Roden, Vaxk-
-
sang froid Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: May 26, 2021
When you bother to actually read the game and don’t just sheep, I guessIn post 277, GuyInFreezer wrote:My reads are pretty accurate most of the time actually.-
-
sang froid Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: May 26, 2021
-
-
sang froid Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: May 26, 2021
-
-
Roden He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Should Vax actually be at E-1 then if you think that was a townlean response...? I think keeping on the pressure here is a good idea regardless so I won't unvote, but that kinda changes things.In post 279, GuyInFreezer wrote:
Plays too weird to be scum + 4D chess.In post 278, Roden wrote:What locked T3 as town for you?
Some reads are just this simple.
Oh some defo do. See, there is this fancy thing called "town bias." Sometimes town fails to mentally grasp the concept that some things are done as scum/not as town because the thought that they are town is so drilled in their head. It's like a confirmation bias, but a bias that comes because they're town thus they cannot be scum. I think the way he reacted is kinda showing this. Now I said "townlean" because yes scum can obviously do this so it's not a strong tell. Arguably it's kinda hard to explain this because it's tied to my perception of ppl's emotion when making a post and if ppl go "I disagree" I can't really do jack about that. tl;dr the act itself sucks but I don't think the way he did it is scummy.In post 278, Roden wrote:I don't think town would react that way
I like these reads tbh, you're bringing up your own points and it's pretty consistent with your ISO. I get your scum lean on T3, though I'm surprised Sang is currently null. Did something ping you?In post 281, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:
I'll just post my entire readslist as of now:In post 270, Roden wrote:Since you haven't voted yet, what's your opinion on the current game state? Between Vax, GIF, and Rock, who's coming off most town to you?
(Town)
Roden
GIF / Clasko
Sang
Johnny
T3
Rockhopper
Vaxkiller
(Mafia)
I'm going to be focusing on the three you wanted me to talk about:
We start from the top: GIF. I was kinda worried that their confident push for 5 TRs was just a ploy to sneak through the other scum and immediately back down, but they seem to have held on their reads, with rather great explanations to boot. And no, it's not because they townread me.
Next up: Rockhopper. I just don't see a lot of proaction in this slot. There are too many questions and not enough answers and reads. On top of that, there doesn't seem to be a lot of direction in their posts. Feels like a "trying to find something to criticize for the sake of it" kind of play.
@RockhopperDo you have a readslist? Could you explain some of the choices?
And finally: Vaxkiller. He was already pretty bad to begin with (see #243) but his insistence on the only kind of maybe towny thing he did (#116) being towny only dug him deeper in my mind. Not so much that he tried to defend it, but he was all "c'mon everyone knows this is obvtown" when it clearly wasn't. Look, not everything you say will look towny. You just have to make the towny parts outshine the scummy parts to look towny as a whole.
VOTE: Vaxkiller E-1-
-
Clasko Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: March 20, 2021
Hello!
- Vax: I used the word "angered" earlier and honestly looking back I regret that and I was wrong to make that assumption.
---
I do disagree with Roden about the T3/Vax pairing. If T3/Vax are a scum pair here, I believe T3 has no reason to not distance given Vax's ISO.
---
Vax himself... IDK. I can see him being scum with Johnny (I guess?) to explain his lack of effort (in a sort of... giving in/waiting for Johnny sort of way?) but I feel scum!Vax, or any scum, tries harder than this. Whilst I don't necessarily buy that his townslip was intentional, at least T3 believes it, so it could be true ig, but this still feels like an easy elim rn.
Roden I'm still comfortable with. I think his play is too open to be scum here. He's given lots of reads and thoughts to look back on if he flips red.
The problem I have with GIF is that whilst I think his thought process is good, it's kind of an easy take to say that Vax is low effort and his read on T3 is flimsy given his considered read on myself yet somehow has the audacity to lock him in. I also think that using "I'm lazy - it's part of my game" (not the exact quote, but along those lines) tells me he's using his own meta to justify a backseat play near the beginning of the game which pings me as scummy. My vote stays there for now.
Rock I feel is coming into his own after a, not necessarily shaky start but an underwhelming one. I said before I thought the way he posted under pressure was good but not ironclad as ofc scum!Rock has an incentive to act calm. I'll have to see more to justify a TR.
I'm seeing a different Sang now to the one that opened up the game. I still maintain his strong opening justifies my town lean but I currently have not much to add here.
Are you still keeping this under wraps?In post 133, sang froid wrote:but I will say that one of my TRs is one I have misgivings with that might flip to a SR but I want to keep that under wraps for a bit while I see what the slot does as game goes on
Jumble I'm so up and down on. Dropping Vax as a TR between posts 213 and 243 pinged me. My case for them being town is flimsy (some good posts that read tonally well, being open with reads) but ultimately they're probably my next elim after GIF as I feel there's a lack of consistency with that slot and 243 could be a way to justify re-opening an easy vax elim so that he isn't immediately seen as jumping from a TR to a SR so blatantly.
T3 I think I would have preferred as town if they didn't just give a readlist based on gut rather than explaining their reads, but their posts haven't overly pinged me as scummy. Their stance on Vax is an interesting one.
Johnny I obviously have no opinion on. Waiting for that slot to speak is irking me because I can't get as full a picture as I would like.-
-
Clasko Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 126
- Joined: March 20, 2021
In post 162, Rockhopper wrote:I still think sang's scum, but it's better to scumhunt outside rather than tunnel especially when he's pretty much consensus town, don't you agree?
Also I forgot to add to my above post, can you explain your shift from sang as scum to neutral on your reads list?In post 282, Rockhopper wrote:sang-
-
Roden He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Well, I was waiting until you'd try to make a case against me but uh, I wasn't expecting this. I don't really know how to address a Vax/me pairing because I honestly don't know how you came to that conclusion. If you want to invest in this case Day 2 then I'd be more than fine to meet you on that. I can only guess you're claiming it because my assumed hero solve at this point would probably be Vax/you (it actually isn't) and you want the distancing points. Because I honestly believe you'd have a more compelling case pairing me up with literally anyone else.In post 282, Rockhopper wrote:In post 281, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:@RockhopperDo you have a readslist? Could you explain some of the choices?Jumble
GIF
T3
Johnny
sang
Roden:Spoiler:
Vaxkiller
Clasko
Gun to head solve: Roden, Vaxk
Gonna address your one and only personal read:
-Your wagon didn't "gain too much traction without resistance." It was in counter to Sang's, and both your wagons died around the same time. Mainly because I took my vote off of youtwiceand acknowledged I was possibly tunneling. Vax notably was votingwithyou against Sang.
-I'm not pushing you "till the end", I'm still currently pushing you. And it's weird that you're lying and saying I haven't responded to your defense or reasoning when I explicitly had to make a post asking you to do exactly that. A good portion of my ISO is just me responding to you and making reads that involve you. I don't know how you can claim that I've in any way ignored you without thinking that sounds even a little bit scummy to lie about. It's so easy to go back and fact check my dude.
-The case wasn't surface level, and those weren't the only things I or multiple other people brought up. You had four votes on you and several people laying out their reads and reasonings for you, but all you can remember is post 160?
-The potential Jumble reevaluation is less likely now to be fair, since I feel like I've got a better read on him now than I did a few days ago. But I'll give you that, I can understand why you think it looks like a Day 2 miselim set up, it wasn't meant to be though.
-Vax isn't my highest scum read, he's about tied with you. You and GIF both go up to a town lean though if Vax flips red. The reason I put my vote on Vax has a lot more to do with than them having a shitty ISO, and this is something I've already stated several times. Why do you keep lying about very basic things that take five minutes to fact check?
-Why would I bus Vax if GIF gave three options for his scum read? In fact, why do I not just jump on GIF since nobody trusted him and he already had two votes? Nobody had jumped on any of his reads yet, and I was only the second vote on Vax. I voted with you here in fact. What makes even less sense is that I'm the one who pushed the most for GIF to explain his reads! Are you saying I saw a shady looking town player scum read my partner with no explanation, practically begged him to explain his reads when he kept saying no, then unnecessarily bussed my partner? I just don't understand how this makes sense to you.
-What about my reads are surface level or general consensus...? I've been pretty open with my thought process the entire time and I've tried to reply to people and update my stances on every page. I've been giving reads even on days where the thread's inactive. A general consensus didn't evenexistfor a little while until I started asking for more people to start giving their thoughts on the game.
-Why is Sang null on your reads list now? You said multiple times that you believed they were scum, but now you've dropped that for a Vax/Roden pairing? What's the thought process behind this, because that wasn't gradual at all.-
-
Roden He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Interesting to see Clasko and I diverge a lot a more from our earlier shared mind set, but I don't see anything wrong with his updated reads. I actually agree that Vax feels like an easy elim, but I think part of it is that it's just not hard to justify a vote on them. Vax isn't doing a lot to gain town points, only giving us a "town slip" that doesn't really guarantee much of anything.-
-
Roden He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
Side tangent thing before I go to bed because Jumble seems to be pretty controversially read.
Sang and Clasko are scum reading Jumble. Rock, GIF, and I are town reading Jumble. T3 and Vax appear to have Jumble as null. Not sure what to make of this or if it even means anything, but it's interesting that none of my town reads are reading Jumble as town.
Sang also surprisingly dropped down to null for a few people now. I feel like I'm missing something.-
-
sang froid Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: May 26, 2021
-
-
sang froid Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 261
- Joined: May 26, 2021
spent a bit considering whether I should answer this, but actually yeah, fuck it, I'll out it: it's RodenIn post 287, Clasko wrote:Are you still keeping this under wraps?
it's a gut thing and I'm not really sure I want to follow it through with a hard push today bc my gut has mixed success when I feel ambivalent, pushing into decent when I feel very strongly about something
but I think that something feels off there, although I can't quite put my finger on what
maybe that I feel like he's taking quite uncontroversial opinions consistently and is making it very clear why he thinks what he thinks etc
the most recent thing that bothered me is the "why are you lying about things that can be confirmed?" which is something that I think often comes from scum when they think town has said something that's like, ambiguously true or in a grey area, and that can be pushed as falsehood
I also found the back-and-forth with me over voting rock weird, I think bc the initial insistence on independence and doing his own thing then came round to getting on board? it almost felt like someone who *wanted* to be persuaded to me, and the fact that he's now also joined on vax is... disquieting
on the other hand, I struggle to read sincere newbie townplay as distinct from newbie scum play (like newbies trying very hard to make sure they're understood and being super logical is something that's more common than in more experienced players I think, who are more likely to act and then explain later)
I think I'm still leaning on a vax lim today, bc I think if vax is scum then that looks good for Roden and this is most likely paranoia from the day taking a while. if vax town then I'll be looking at Roden more closely while I read overnight-
-
GuyInFreezer Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Posts: 18127
- Joined: January 23, 2013
- Location: In your wall
you mad broIn post 287, Clasko wrote:nd his read on T3 is flimsy given his considered read on myself yet somehow has the audacity to lock him inShow"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae-
-
NotAJumbleOfNumbers Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 691
- Joined: April 30, 2018
If it weren't for that confusing opening then I'd probably townlean him but said opening has just muddied the waters a bit for me.In post 286, Roden wrote:I get your scum lean on T3, though I'm surprised Sang is currently null. Did something ping you?
PSA: USE YOUR BOOKMARKS-
-
NotAJumbleOfNumbers Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 691
- Joined: April 30, 2018
We don't actually know if they're a newbie to Mafia or not, given that they never answered the RQS questions. It couldn’t hurt to ask.In post 293, sang froid wrote:on the other hand, I struggle to read sincere newbie townplay as distinct from newbie scum play (like newbies trying very hard to make sure they're understood and being super logical is something that's more common than in more experienced players I think, who are more likely to act and then explain later)
@RodenWhat is your Mafia experience?
PSA: USE YOUR BOOKMARKS-
-
Rockhopper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: June 17, 2019
There's no reason for scum!Vax to be so laid back unless his partner is fairly (pro)active. And like I said, your insistence on eliminating me based on bad reasoning and your weird hop on Vaxk make you seem like the most likely choice for his partner. Why would I assume that when you literally say the opposite in 242In post 289, Roden wrote:
Well, I was waiting until you'd try to make a case against me but uh, I wasn't expecting this. I don't really know how to address a Vax/me pairing because I honestly don't know how you came to that conclusion. If you want to invest in this case Day 2 then I'd be more than fine to meet you on that. I can only guess you're claiming it because my assumed hero solve at this point would probably be Vax/you (it actually isn't) and you want the distancing points. Because I honestly believe you'd have a more compelling case pairing me up with literally anyone else.In post 282, Rockhopper wrote:In post 281, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:@RockhopperDo you have a readslist? Could you explain some of the choices?Jumble
GIF
T3
Johnny
sang
Roden:Spoiler:
Vaxkiller
Clasko
Gun to head solve: Roden, Vaxk
Given that I tr Jumble and Vax's vote was possibly rvs, I maintain that there's a good chance scum was on my wagon. Sang's wagon was feeble to begin with, and mine reached E-1 when it died (150)Gonna address your one and only personal read:
-Your wagon didn't "gain too much traction without resistance." It was in counter to Sang's, and both your wagons died around the same time. Mainly because I took my vote off of youtwiceand acknowledged I was possibly tunneling. Vax notably was votingwithyou against Sang.
Till the end of Day 1, like you said. And what did I lie about? You maintained your scumread on me and never commented on what I said in 110.-I'm not pushing you "till the end", I'm still currently pushing you. And it's weird that you're lying and saying I haven't responded to your defense or reasoning when I explicitly had to make a post asking you to do exactly that. A good portion of my ISO is just me responding to you and making reads that involve you. I don't know how you can claim that I've in any way ignored you without thinking that sounds even a little bit scummy to lie about. It's so easy to go back and fact check my dude.
-The case wasn't surface level, and those weren't the only things I or multiple other people brought up. You had four votes on you and several people laying out their reads and reasonings for you, but all you can remember is post 160?
As far as I can tell, the reasons were: 1) that I was opportunistic, which is a weird buzzword to throw around because you could say the same for any vote anybody makes even if it came from a town perspective (which is the case here), 2) that my vote was based on flimsy reasoning, which I already disagreed with in 110, 3) that the joke about clearing each other for having the same tastes didn't read right, to which I say I'm awkward in general, and 4) that it's scummy to think an experienced scum player would blatantly post PR bait like that, which kinda contradicts itself.
Whatever your reasons maybe, the fact that Vax did shift to being your scumread after GIF's statement doesn't sit well with me. You said it yourself that it was hard to discern scum!Vax's partner which is all the more incentive for you to bus at first chance, assuming you are his partner. And GIF was bound to explain his reads anyway (5 day solve or whatever), regardless of whether it was you or anyone else who would push him to do so. As for why Vax given the 2 other options? You expressed a strong townread on Clasko already and Johnny is yet to post. GIF's reasoning was good enough to keep him alive for today, and pushing him before wouldn't have made any sense.-The potential Jumble reevaluation is less likely now to be fair, since I feel like I've got a better read on him now than I did a few days ago. But I'll give you that, I can understand why you think it looks like a Day 2 miselim set up, it wasn't meant to be though.
-Vax isn't my highest scum read, he's about tied with you. You and GIF both go up to a town lean though if Vax flips red. The reason I put my vote on Vax has a lot more to do with than them having a shitty ISO, and this is something I've already stated several times. Why do you keep lying about very basic things that take five minutes to fact check?
-Why would I bus Vax if GIF gave three options for his scum read? In fact, why do I not just jump on GIF since nobody trusted him and he already had two votes? Nobody had jumped on any of his reads yet, and I was only the second vote on Vax. I voted with you here in fact. What makes even less sense is that I'm the one who pushed the most for GIF to explain his reads! Are you saying I saw a shady looking town player scum read my partner with no explanation, practically begged him to explain his reads when he kept saying no, then unnecessarily bussed my partner? I just don't understand how this makes sense to you.-
-
GuyInFreezer Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Magical Girl
- Posts: 18127
- Joined: January 23, 2013
- Location: In your wall
tbh I wasn't gonna until I remembered that this is a newbie game and thus I should play more constructivelyIn post 297, Rockhopper wrote:And GIF was bound to explain his reads anyway (5 day solve or whatever)Show"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae-
-
Rockhopper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: June 17, 2019
Point being ppl were gonna push even if he didn't.In post 298, GuyInFreezer wrote:
tbh I wasn't gonna until I remembered that this is a newbie game and thus I should play more constructivelyIn post 297, Rockhopper wrote:And GIF was bound to explain his reads anyway (5 day solve or whatever)
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.