Saber (3): Beast, Rider, Archer
Caster (1): Alter Ego
Avenger (1): Shielder
Ruler (1): Lancer
Lancer (1): Ruler
Deadline: (expired on 2021-07-12 00:17:51)
Page Usage: 31/42
Umm, no? You, Saber, and Avenger were all at the bottom of my prior read list.In post 1548, Servant Foreigner wrote:Are you kind of players, who suspect people which you disagree with? It is not really the best tool, scum right now are more likely to push the counterwagon rather then defend partner.In post 1512, Servant Archer wrote:These are the people I am okay with flipping atm :
[Saber, Avenger, Foreigner,Ruler]
And so far, my read list has not really needed any shaking up from my POV.In post 1551, Servant Archer wrote:Umm, no? You, Saber, and Avenger were all at the bottom of my prior read list.
And like --- this is exactly what Ruler did....In post 1548, Servant Foreigner wrote:scum right now are more likely to push the counterwagon rather then defend partner.
In post 1287, Servant Ruler wrote:At least one between lancer/alter is scum for their hard push against avenger.
I think it's more likely to be a bus-vote that he thought was evident rather than pushing for a mis-elim.In post 1538, Servant Alter Ego wrote:Do you have thoughts on it?
And that is why I gave more detail on the Ruler slot??In post 1553, Servant Foreigner wrote:i underlined ruler, because i was referring to it
In post 1551, Servant Archer wrote:As for Ruler, I am suspicious of that slot because :
~It repeatedly tried to lead the thread away from a Moon Cancer elim
~The anger about us voting Avenger, read to me like someone with tmi knowledge that Avenger was town, and I have yet to see any better reason for the stance that they took (and I asked many times)
~I am also suspicious of people who claim to "not know what is going on" but repeatedly show thread awareness.
In post 1554, Servant Archer wrote:And like --- this is exactly what Ruler did....In post 1548, Servant Foreigner wrote:scum right now are more likely to push the counterwagon rather then defend partner.
The moment the Gladiate ended, Ruler stepped in, and tried to give us a new direction, instead of having us go back to Moon CancerIn post 1287, Servant Ruler wrote:At least one between lancer/alter is scum for their hard push against avenger.
why would it not make sense for town!me to take a step back when I'm one of the louder voices and have been shown to be wrong?In post 1535, Servant Alter Ego wrote:I think you're capable of more as town and the fact that I haven't seen it is what concerns me. The self-defense that you "wouldn't play like this" as scum are just WIFOM. The question is not whether you could play differently, it's whether your behavior makes more sense from scum or town. And right now I'm not seeing much town.
whatever i am not in the mood to argueIn post 1556, Servant Archer wrote:And that is why I gave more detail on the Ruler slot??In post 1553, Servant Foreigner wrote:i underlined ruler, because i was referring to it
This is a strange response.In post 1558, Servant Foreigner wrote:whatever i am not in the mood to argueIn post 1556, Servant Archer wrote:And that is why I gave more detail on the Ruler slot??In post 1553, Servant Foreigner wrote:i underlined ruler, because i was referring to it
In post 1551, Servant Archer wrote:Umm, no? You, Saber, and Avenger were all at the bottom of my prior read list.
In post 1553, Servant Foreigner wrote:i underlined ruler, because i was referring to it
speak about other reads. I am trying to clarify that my question doesn't refer to it at all but instead you drag pointless argue. I regret i even started this.In post 1552, Servant Archer wrote:And so far, my read list has not really needed any shaking up from my POV.In post 1551, Servant Archer wrote:Umm, no? You, Saber, and Avenger were all at the bottom of my prior read list.
My top town read flipped town, and one of my scum reads flipped scum
In post 1548, Servant Foreigner wrote:Are you kind of players, who suspect people which you disagree with? It is not really the best tool, scum right now are more likely to push the counterwagon rather then defend partner.In post 1512, Servant Archer wrote:These are the people I am okay with flipping atm :
[--, --, --, --Ruler]
In post 1551, Servant Archer wrote: Umm, no? ---
for Ruler, I am suspicious of that slot because :
~It repeatedly tried to lead the thread away from a Moon Cancer elim
~The anger about us voting Avenger, read to me like someone with tmi knowledge that Avenger was town, and I have yet to see any better reason for the stance that they took (and I asked many times)
~I am also suspicious of people who claim to "not know what is going on" but repeatedly show thread awareness.
Do you have more thoughts about the Ruler slot?In post 1554, Servant Archer wrote:And like --- this is exactly what Ruler did....In post 1548, Servant Foreigner wrote:scum right now are more likely to push the counterwagon rather then defend partner.
The moment the Gladiate ended, Ruler stepped in, and tried to give us a new direction, instead of having us go back to Moon CancerIn post 1287, Servant Ruler wrote:At least one between lancer/alter is scum for their hard push against avenger.
They appear to be trying desperately to save Saber, for reasons I am not quite sure onIn post 1565, Servant Berserker wrote:does anyone have any idea what Ruler is doing rn?
I believe that was a call back to this line:In post 1568, Servant Berserker wrote:the big wtf for me is the self-vote
In post 1459, Servant Ruler wrote:Also sabers getting eliminated ovrr my dead body
To be clear, I was suspicious of Ruler before any of this stuff with Saber (although, it has not really helped)In post 1569, Servant Foreigner wrote:I think that people SR ruler improperly. She is not positioning herself against Saber, which as scum she would. She just disagree with people for sake of her ego.
this is kinda what I feel is the case myselfIn post 1569, Servant Foreigner wrote:I think that people SR ruler improperly. She is not positioning herself against Saber, which as scum she would. She just disagree with people for sake of her ego.