In post 516, VFP wrote:T3 is cleared as the bride.
PP is basically cleared as VT from T3 proposing to them.
I'm cleared because everyone has townlocked me.
Although I'm not too sure because apparently everyone decided to lie at some point other than me.
Arc claimed VT, then into PR to CC NM.
Your slot claimed PR
T3 obviously Bride
The rest say VT.
We haven’t lied and Dan seems really hellbent on killing you.
You TR him, I have a different impression from Hop that at least he doesn't TR VFP.
In any case I think VFP is scum for the following:
the last line of post 90; 251/268; the vote on NM was just bad.
Continuously posting about how he fails to understand the most rudimentary aspects of the setup, but still voted based on false assumptions (see the NM vote and rational for it). 337 is awkward considering I'm voting him and have always expressed a scum read on him at that point.
His posts in general do nothing in the way of scumhunting.
anyway eliminating in Rock/VFP will always get 1 scum decent chance of 2, so as long as that happens I'm ok, but I do prefer VFP > Rock by a fair margin.
In post 454, Pink Panthers wrote:Which probably leads to town arc which then leaves
Enchant/VFP
Enchant/Rock
Rock/VFP
Does rock make that claim without intent for one partner to claim mystic? Not sure if Rock/VFP makes sense unless they didn’t bother to think about the setup/their claims
In post 455, Pink Panthers wrote:Enchant/Rock makes sense associative wise from Rock's iso. pure omgus pushing on my slot without any good reason to this point, pushing Dan, has VFP in pool
don't see thoughts i like trying to sort the mystics from rock- literally doesn't mention anything on Enchant except assuming they're conf.town is stated indirectly once
Dan what are your thoughts on my thoughtspews/any sound like they make sense?
-Hop
These are the only two posts I could muster any care for.
To the first: No idea. I don't think the claim made any sense from a town perspective, and I tend to not care about rationalizing it from a scum perspective, as you get into WIFOM territory. It could be a seamstress trying to get some equity for not being brided. It could be just some cheeky play with inextricable lines of thought behind it
For the second: I broadly agree, though the argument goes more against rockhopper. I tend to analyze associatives by looking less at scum's posts towards your person of interest than of their posts concerning flipped scum. Considering Arc's posts towards rockhopper if rock flipped scum I'd definitely eliminate enchant over arc if it comes to that (but I'd eliminate VFP before either)
Again, there's no reason for me to retract my suit claim if Enchant is my partner.
In post 519, Dwlee99 wrote:Why do you think notmafia started as VT? Couldn't a seamstress have changed him to VT? Regardless, based on that info I feel like rock is the clear choice so I'm gonna go with t3 on that VOTE: Rock
How does going from a seamstress suit claim to VT benefit me as scum?
In post 303, Rockhopper wrote:
Scum I expect would slip up (or react differently) *because* they know I'm lying. It may not be a sure shot strat but it at least could have given us something to work with.
In post 185, Pink Panthers wrote:I don't think the Gamma hydra would make this slip
ActionDan seems to have noticed the same stuff i did here so is less likely scum since scum doing this strat then getting the other to point it out for towncred is super -ev
taking them out of the subsequent pool leaves (NM/VFP/Arc)
-Hop
VOTE: Panthers
It's quite strange that you conveniently leave out possible situations that involve town!me to push your confscum!rock narrative.
Assume the team is {actress, seamstress} for instance. Why don't you think a mystic could lie about their role to essentially become an activated innocent child or something of that sort? Dan seemed to have suggested the idea in his posts, but you just straight up discard it??
Even if it's just {actress, actress}, why would lying about having a seamstress suit necessarily point to me being scum?
It isn't harmful to town in any way and can help increase the likelihood of scum slipping up the way I see it (which I think is the case here).
Your case doesn't look like something that comes out of a townie mindset, since I'd expect town!you to actually analyze how sensible a lie would be from either alignment before jumping to such an extreme conclusion.
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
Night 3 begins now and will end in (expired on 2021-07-15 22:19:16). Please message me "Fast night" or any equivalent if you wish to have day start sooner. If all players message me before night ends, I will open the thread as soon as I am able to.
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
Hey sorry, fell asleep early last night and had a tough work day so I forgot about this game. Day 4 begins and ends in (expired on 2021-07-23 14:50:34).
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
