"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
Given that your previous thoughts on me were that I was scummy, I don't see how you get from "Farren is scummy" to "I think I'll vote elsewhere" without changing your mind. Moreover, jumping to someone that was voting for me at the time.
The logical explanation is that you don't actually think I'm scummy.
Actually, I did just think of a potential reason - at least for the changing your vote in general. But I still want to hear yours.
I have not been the most transparent this game about what I'm looking for / my reads so im curious how exactly are you approaching my slot
The ping was just the "hm scum" line from earlier. And I had a mental note to follow up on that earlier, which I promptly forgot about.
Hunting is good. If I see someone hunting the way I do, that's easy enough to figure out. But most people don't hunt like I do, so I try to get ideas on how, see if I can at least understand what they're thinking. If not, it's either a scum-sign or a sign that I'm going to have major problems with that person, one way or the other.
In post 337, Dannflor wrote:honestly I feel like you don't randomly hop on a new wagon, while you still had traction on the old wagon, admit you are still scum reading your old wagon, and then claim your only reason for starting the new wagon is "I felt like it," as scum
I don't think there was much traction left in that wagon.
Given that your previous thoughts on me were that I was scummy, I don't see how you get from "Farren is scummy" to "I think I'll vote elsewhere" without changing your mind. Moreover, jumping to someone that was voting for me at the time.
The logical explanation is that you don't actually think I'm scummy.
Actually, I did just think of a potential reason - at least for the changing your vote in general. But I still want to hear yours.
In post 337, Dannflor wrote:honestly I feel like you don't randomly hop on a new wagon, while you still had traction on the old wagon, admit you are still scum reading your old wagon, and then claim your only reason for starting the new wagon is "I felt like it," as scum
I don't think there was much traction left in that wagon.
i mean there were 3 votes on you
it seemed to lose traction because esooa moved their vote
I'm not gonna vote camp someone all day. Sounds boring. Besides that I scum read red, which I've said. You've really got a problem with someone moving their vote from one scum read to another?
In post 352, Ich Troje wrote:Town esooa likes to get into fights and thunderdomes, scum esooa likes to stay away from that, both are aggressive though usually, but scum esooa notably is not as much so or rather can be passive and let others run the show.
In post 412, Esooa wrote:I'm not gonna vote camp someone all day. Sounds boring. Besides that I scum read red, which I've said. You've really got a problem with someone moving their vote from one scum read to another?
Depends on the circumstances. On what you're trying to accomplish.
In post 419, Farren wrote:385 is interesting. I want to come back to this later. There may be something Town here, depending on what happens later.
what does this mean lol
I think 385 may be a sign that I'm misreading you, but I need more information. It's not the sort of information where I can just ask a question, get an answer, and go from there, so I have to wait and see what happens.