I'd be relentlessly bussing cyrus if I were scum here
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
In post 16, HockeyFan wrote:no? If we get Player X and Player Y. and Player x's role is innocent, and they get a true result, they will be annouced as town. However, lets say we roll a 6 on the 1VX(number of mafia), Players Y's role will be announced as town even if they are mafia so we do we really have confirms? I could just be stupid
Wont X elimination confirms that Y result was untrue.
Elimination does reveal their rule faction isn't it?
If X gets eliminated, it confirms that X's result was true, it does *not* confirm that Y's result was false.
Since "X is innocent" is true, that means that "X is innocent or ..." is true regardless of what comes after the or
My only question is what happens if both results are false
We are complicating it. It is simple
D1 reveals the identity of two players - One of it is True and the other is false. Eliminate one and the other gets confirmed.
In post 182, cyrus62 wrote:discrediting everyone here aka chainsawing.and whiteknighting.
I don't know what chainsawing is, but WKing is defending people, and "too early to call them scum" is way to weak a defense to call it that.
Angel's post was scummy to me, but that's because she was dismissing Hockey and your (Cyrus) reads rather than trying to
In post 182, cyrus62 wrote:discrediting everyone here aka chainsawing.and whiteknighting.
I don't know what chainsawing is, but WKing is defending people, and "too early to call them scum" is way to weak a defense to call it that.
Angel's post was scummy to me, but that's because she was dismissing Hockey and your (Cyrus) reads rather than trying to
discuss
them, not because she was 'whiteknighting'
so you think arc is scum too?
scum cyrus slways kills carls night 1
Cyrus has us as scum together but I'm not sure this guy has the power to rally any votes given his playstyle
This 'I have a read but I won't tell you it yet' seems anti-town. Seems like keeping it unspoken means you can wait to see whether others lean cyrus:town or cyrus:scum so you can then say that's what your read was too.
This feels like a highly speculative post that
essentially boils down to "T3 is being scummy if they are in the majority"
It doesn't feel like something a townie would push.
Bolded is a complete misrepresentation of my point.
In post 181, T3 wrote:Good analysis of imaginality and I don't think they are s/s.
Where is this 'good analysis' you speak of? Choosing such a flimsy reason to call T3 town makes me wonder if you're trying to shift attention away from him. Are you buddies?
"holy shit this entire time i thought imaginalitys profile was a purple seahorse" - camelCasedSnivy
In post 16, HockeyFan wrote:no? If we get Player X and Player Y. and Player x's role is innocent, and they get a true result, they will be annouced as town. However, lets say we roll a 6 on the 1VX(number of mafia), Players Y's role will be announced as town even if they are mafia so we do we really have confirms? I could just be stupid
Wont X elimination confirms that Y result was untrue.
Elimination does reveal their rule faction isn't it?
If X gets eliminated, it confirms that X's result was true, it does *not* confirm that Y's result was false.
Since "X is innocent" is true, that means that "X is innocent or ..." is true regardless of what comes after the or
My only question is what happens if both results are false
We are complicating it. It is simple
D1 reveals the identity of two players - One of it is True and the other is false. Eliminate one and the other gets confirmed.
In post 182, cyrus62 wrote:discrediting everyone here aka chainsawing.and whiteknighting.
I don't know what chainsawing is, but WKing is defending people, and "too early to call them scum" is way to weak a defense to call it that.
Angel's post was scummy to me, but that's because she was dismissing Hockey and your (Cyrus) reads rather than trying to
discuss
them, not because she was 'whiteknighting'
so you think arc is scum too?
I find her post to be suspicious, yes
But atm I'm interested in what your definitions of those terms are