Have you actively confirmed that it affects the counts needed for votes, though?In post 1245, GuyInFreezer wrote:All I know is that it works like a commute but staying commuted for unforeseen amount of phases, including the day phase. So I won't even flip. I'm just gonna be yeeted.In post 1243, GuyInFreezer wrote:I'm yeeted off the game during Night 1. I do not know if I can come back to the game thread afterwards.
Yeah. I will be considered as if I am not in the game.In post 1250, Cabd wrote:Have you actively confirmed that it affects the counts needed for votes, though?
I mean that doesn't reeeeally work on me because I'm the one who made you say that in the first place
from what ive seen when someone faked smthn about invests before on a townie, the townie got more like.. motivated to go after someone, since they think somebodies lied.In post 1239, Lukewarm wrote:Marci, you are like setting up this scenario of what you think I should have done, and to be frank. I don't understand why you think I should have done what you think I should have done. (and this is a combo of a couple questions you had for me, starting with asking why Kate was null)
I'm glad you mentioned it, but hold off talking more about it while I ask our beneficent mod a couple questions.In post 1252, GuyInFreezer wrote:Yeah. I will be considered as if I am not in the game.In post 1250, Cabd wrote:Have you actively confirmed that it affects the counts needed for votes, though?
Did you let the rest of the game know that?In post 1258, Dunnstral wrote:We aren't mass claiming
Yeah no let's fucking not and say we didn't. A lot of negative util players have claimed, as it is there's a beacon pointing at the unclaimed as positive util...In post 1258, Dunnstral wrote:We aren't mass claiming
The thought crossed my mind, but nah.In post 1259, GuyInFreezer wrote:ngl with an upick with no scum fakeclaims given, massclaim wouldn't be half a bad idea.
Yeah I'm against massclaiming.In post 1263, Cabd wrote:The thought crossed my mind, but nah.In post 1259, GuyInFreezer wrote:ngl with an upick with no scum fakeclaims given, massclaim wouldn't be half a bad idea.
Like I said at the time, my gut reaction was that it never happened, and that notty was just trying to see how I would respond.In post 1257, marcistar wrote:from what ive seen when someone faked smthn about invests before on a townie, the townie got more like.. motivated to go after someone, since they think somebodies lied.In post 1239, Lukewarm wrote:Marci, you are like setting up this scenario of what you think I should have done, and to be frank. I don't understand why you think I should have done what you think I should have done. (and this is a combo of a couple questions you had for me, starting with asking why Kate was null)
im concerned why you didn't get that same motivation i usually see.
"wouldn't you be concerned if you knew your town, and somebodies saying you came up as guilty?" tis my thought process.
i did not expect u to be caught up,
i expected u to be more concerned here about motivations. (whether its kate bishops, or unwnds)
not like, have a read but i was expecting aIn post 1265, Lukewarm wrote:Do you think that I should have immediately scum read notty for it? Or immediately scum read unwnd? Like, what do you mean?
sumn aint right let me try to see what their intentions are" And like, to really highlight the difference. T3 basically said "I am hard claiming an investigative role with a guilty on Lukewarm, everyone vote Luke warm with me"In post 1265, Lukewarm wrote:I feel like you are trying to draw a parallel to our last newbie game, where T3 faked a guilty on me, and I assumed that made him scum... but like, this is a very different situation...
For starters, I never saw someone claim to have a result on me. I saw one person say that someone else had a result. And a day result at that. So yeah, my first thought went to "notty is bullshitting right now"
Instead of "I am not going to let someone get away with faking a guilty because that is actually some bullshit"
I feel like I am talking at you, and you are not hearing me....In post 1267, marcistar wrote:not like, have a read but i was expecting aIn post 1265, Lukewarm wrote:Do you think that I should have immediately scum read notty for it? Or immediately scum read unwnd? Like, what do you mean?
"hold up
Yandere but yesIn post 1270, Kate Bishop wrote:No guarantees, GiF, but here goes.
remember that game where you were tsundere and your partner didn't make a single post the whole game?
upon much thought you're probably right about this, though im still inclined the weird soft is more likely to come from town then scum. overall its like maybe one peg down on my lukewarm TRIn post 1199, GuyInFreezer wrote:And I completely disagree on this and the only reason why it would look like town is because they are both genuine in their conversation. Except that the back-and-forth was due to miscommunication. Of course they will both sound genuine regardless of their alignment.In post 1197, ManateeGal wrote:i think ur early role shenanigans w unwnd were in the space between nonsenical and understandable that only comes from town.