No one would call this rolefishing. Only you, and only when you have an agenda to push.In post 1943, Titus wrote:More rolefishing.In post 395, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I just want a Manatee full claim at this point tbh
LLD claim also is a soft contradiction of my role. It's not a lock contradiction. I get why Toog pushed on it. However, a role that fakes guilties to just trackers makes no sense when tracker is so gated.In post 1945, DrippingGoofball wrote:If Titus was scum, she'd go along with the prevailing winds and call me scum.In post 1935, WhemeStar wrote:Titus is scum here it’s okay DGB
If LLD is saying the truth about being abrainwashed townie performing the kills on behalf of scum, scum would protect LLD and let her live to the bitter end. Not go after her in the game daylight hours.
All she needs to do to survive is to vote me.In post 1949, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:If Titus went with the prevailing winds, she would DIE.
...In post 1951, Titus wrote:LLD claim also is a soft contradiction of my role. It's not a lock contradiction. I get why Toog pushed on it. However, a role that fakes guilties to just trackers makes no sense when tracker is so gated.In post 1945, DrippingGoofball wrote:If Titus was scum, she'd go along with the prevailing winds and call me scum.In post 1935, WhemeStar wrote:Titus is scum here it’s okay DGB
If LLD is saying the truth about being abrainwashed townie performing the kills on behalf of scum, scum would protect LLD and let her live to the bitter end. Not go after her in the game daylight hours.
The only way I see it making sense is that they commandeer LLD's nightaction and blocking LLD blocks the nk but that's bastard.
So it's bad when Toog wants more information on a role you claimed voluntarily (you attacked him for asking if your brainwash could be cleansed) but it's ok when you do it.In post 1950, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:No one would call this rolefishing. Only you, and only when you have an agenda to push.In post 1943, Titus wrote:More rolefishing.In post 395, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I just want a Manatee full claim at this point tbh
Asking Manatee to full claim her half claimed Role that she Claimed of her OWN VOLITION because it is confusing as sin and very scummy and I want to sort her
is NOT Rolefishing, Titus.
If they use me? The kill should be stopped, I assume.In post 1954, DrippingGoofball wrote:LLD, what happens if you are roleblocked?
OK so we can roleblock you every night and there will be no NKs?In post 1957, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:If they use me? The kill should be stopped, I assume.In post 1954, DrippingGoofball wrote:LLD, what happens if you are roleblocked?
Again. Telling him not to read into things in the wording of my post is not attacking him. It's answering his question and cutting off further stupid ones I can't answer because of that reason.In post 1956, Titus wrote:So it's bad when Toog wants more information on a role you claimed voluntarily (you attacked him for asking if your brainwash could be cleansed) but it's ok when you do it.In post 1950, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:No one would call this rolefishing. Only you, and only when you have an agenda to push.In post 1943, Titus wrote:More rolefishing.In post 395, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I just want a Manatee full claim at this point tbh
Asking Manatee to full claim her half claimed Role that she Claimed of her OWN VOLITION because it is confusing as sin and very scummy and I want to sort her
is NOT Rolefishing, Titus.
LLD, you are at best a negative utility that's a hypocrite.
Once again, this is bad logic.In post 1958, DrippingGoofball wrote:OK so we can roleblock you every night and there will be no NKs?In post 1957, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:If they use me? The kill should be stopped, I assume.In post 1954, DrippingGoofball wrote:LLD, what happens if you are roleblocked?
See how easy it is to apply even the most basic level of logic?In post 1960, WhemeStar wrote:No because they can use other people to kill
How so?In post 1960, WhemeStar wrote:No because they can use other people to kill
So this is essentially a compulsive day vig that resolves at EoD.In post 414, ManateeGal wrote:i have a second vote. placing it on a player that doesnt get elimed kills them.
placing it on a player that does get elim gives me a vig shot.
not placing it kills a random townie at night.
i knew i didnt want to not place it and i knew i wanted 2 keep the rest under wraps hence my original claim
You mean other scum team members?In post 1960, WhemeStar wrote:No because they can use other people to kill
???In post 1963, Kate Bishop wrote:How so?In post 1960, WhemeStar wrote:No because they can use other people to kill
+1In post 1966, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:???In post 1963, Kate Bishop wrote:How so?In post 1960, WhemeStar wrote:No because they can use other people to kill
????????????????????
In post 1965, DrippingGoofball wrote:You mean other scum team members?In post 1960, WhemeStar wrote:No because they can use other people to kill
My hands are too old to play League anymore. They took out all the thought and made it button mash.In post 420, Kate Bishop wrote:I just played the worst game of league!
The Ryze only ulted back a duo of useless ragers.
He kept getting sent back to the beginning. Why, and how should be evident. Fucking soloqueue lmao
It's a good question to ask.In post 1961, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I can ask the Mod
This was not clear to me from your original post. I thought "use other people" meant use other people besides themselves to make the kill.WhemeStar wrote:In post 1965, DrippingGoofball wrote:You mean other scum team members?In post 1960, WhemeStar wrote:No because they can use other people to kill
Yes lol