Not entirely true.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Friendly Neighbor that leaves Masons
The recipient knows the sender is town, but the sender does not know the recipient is town.
Not entirely true.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Friendly Neighbor that leaves Masons
Think what you want.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Part of me thinks you might be bluffing me, House.
House, you're not going to get hard data Day 1.In post 1872, House wrote:I told you. I just got back myself, and people's playstyles have changed.In post 1868, Wake1 wrote:Could you please take this game seriously, House?In post 1866, House wrote:Not interested in bussing this early.
You were asking for me to come in and play and now I'm here.
Could you please answer my questions seriously when I ask them?
I'm not all about getting rid of the experienced players without something substantial (hard data, not speculation) to support it.
If it happens, it happens. But I'm not going to be part of it.
But FN acts at Night, which we haven't even had yet, so you can't be a FN if that's your angle.In post 1875, House wrote:Not entirely true.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Friendly Neighbor that leaves Masons
The recipient knows the sender is town, but the sender does not know the recipient is town.
Precisely my point.In post 1877, Wake1 wrote:House, you're not going to get hard data Day 1.
It's not.In post 1878, Wake1 wrote:But FN acts at Night, which we haven't even had yet, so you can't be a FN if that's your angle.In post 1875, House wrote:Not entirely true.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Friendly Neighbor that leaves Masons
The recipient knows the sender is town, but the sender does not know the recipient is town.
I'm pointing out that you did get hard data on Almost50's multiple contradictions yet you're choosing to ignore it.In post 1879, House wrote:Precisely my point.In post 1877, Wake1 wrote:House, you're not going to get hard data Day 1.
Thank you.
That leaves Masons, which can act during the day, but the way you described it it can't be Masons either, which reads to me as a complete bluff, which means you have no reason to auto-trust Titus's read of Mathblade, whom both would be unknowns to you if you were Town.In post 1880, House wrote:It's not.In post 1878, Wake1 wrote:But FN acts at Night, which we haven't even had yet, so you can't be a FN if that's your angle.In post 1875, House wrote:Not entirely true.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Friendly Neighbor that leaves Masons
The recipient knows the sender is town, but the sender does not know the recipient is town.
I don't think you appreciate my appetite for answers, House.In post 1876, House wrote:Think what you want.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Part of me thinks you might be bluffing me, House.
I'm not giving up valuable information to appease you.
You're speculating that his contradictions are borne of scum intent.In post 1881, Wake1 wrote:I'm pointing out that you did get hard data on Almost50's multiple contradictions yet you're choosing to ignore it.In post 1879, House wrote:Precisely my point.In post 1877, Wake1 wrote:House, you're not going to get hard data Day 1.
Thank you.
Nah.In post 1882, Wake1 wrote:That leaves Masons, which can act during the day, but the way you described it it can't be Masons either, which reads to me as a complete bluff, which means you have no reason to auto-trust Titus's read of Mathblade, whom both would be unknowns to you if you were Town.In post 1880, House wrote:It's not.In post 1878, Wake1 wrote:But FN acts at Night, which we haven't even had yet, so you can't be a FN if that's your angle.In post 1875, House wrote:Not entirely true.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Friendly Neighbor that leaves Masons
The recipient knows the sender is town, but the sender does not know the recipient is town.
Make it make sense, House.
I don't think you appreciate the value of my intel.In post 1883, Wake1 wrote:I don't think you appreciate my appetite for answers, House.In post 1876, House wrote:Think what you want.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Part of me thinks you might be bluffing me, House.
I'm not giving up valuable information to appease you.
When you are Town you DON'T contradict yourself, because that means you're lying.In post 1884, House wrote:You're speculating that his contradictions are borne of scum intent.In post 1881, Wake1 wrote:I'm pointing out that you did get hard data on Almost50's multiple contradictions yet you're choosing to ignore it.In post 1879, House wrote:Precisely my point.In post 1877, Wake1 wrote:House, you're not going to get hard data Day 1.
Thank you.
He might be meming. I'm more interested in his associations and voting pattern.
I don't mistake obstinance for intelligence.In post 1886, House wrote:I don't think you appreciate the value of my intel.In post 1883, Wake1 wrote:I don't think you appreciate my appetite for answers, House.In post 1876, House wrote:Think what you want.In post 1874, Wake1 wrote:Part of me thinks you might be bluffing me, House.
I'm not giving up valuable information to appease you.
Yes.In post 1887, Wake1 wrote:When you are Town you DON'T contradict yourself, because that means you're lying.In post 1884, House wrote:You're speculating that his contradictions are borne of scum intent.In post 1881, Wake1 wrote:I'm pointing out that you did get hard data on Almost50's multiple contradictions yet you're choosing to ignore it.In post 1879, House wrote:Precisely my point.In post 1877, Wake1 wrote:House, you're not going to get hard data Day 1.
Thank you.
He might be meming. I'm more interested in his associations and voting pattern.
Obviously your views can evolve, but that's different from blatant, hypocritical contradictions.
Out of curiosity do you also think it's OK for Town to lie?
That makes no sense whatsoever.In post 1888, House wrote:I'll go to my grave before i talk about how I can tell Titus is town
Being able to read her is more important to me than staying alive in one game.
So do you think Town and Scum can basically act the same? Where do you draw the line if lying, contradictions, etc is OK if you're Town?In post 1891, House wrote:Yes.In post 1887, Wake1 wrote:When you are Town you DON'T contradict yourself, because that means you're lying.In post 1884, House wrote:You're speculating that his contradictions are borne of scum intent.In post 1881, Wake1 wrote:I'm pointing out that you did get hard data on Almost50's multiple contradictions yet you're choosing to ignore it.In post 1879, House wrote:Precisely my point.In post 1877, Wake1 wrote:House, you're not going to get hard data Day 1.
Thank you.
He might be meming. I'm more interested in his associations and voting pattern.
Obviously your views can evolve, but that's different from blatant, hypocritical contradictions.
Out of curiosity do you also think it's OK for Town to lie?
I lie as town pretty frequently.
I have in this game, in fact. Unless you think I was serious when I told Nero I was a Town Compulsive Self-targeting Friendly Neighbor.
OkIn post 1892, Wake1 wrote:That makes no sense whatsoever.In post 1888, House wrote:I'll go to my grave before i talk about how I can tell Titus is town
Being able to read her is more important to me than staying alive in one game.
If in reality you're being this recklessly stubborn based on just a read then you're only hurting Town, IF you are Town.
Of course they can.In post 1893, Wake1 wrote:So do you think Town and Scum can basically act the same? Where do you draw the line if lying, contradictions, etc is OK if you're Town?In post 1891, House wrote:Yes.In post 1887, Wake1 wrote:When you are Town you DON'T contradict yourself, because that means you're lying.In post 1884, House wrote:You're speculating that his contradictions are borne of scum intent.In post 1881, Wake1 wrote:I'm pointing out that you did get hard data on Almost50's multiple contradictions yet you're choosing to ignore it.In post 1879, House wrote:Precisely my point.In post 1877, Wake1 wrote:House, you're not going to get hard data Day 1.
Thank you.
He might be meming. I'm more interested in his associations and voting pattern.
Obviously your views can evolve, but that's different from blatant, hypocritical contradictions.
Out of curiosity do you also think it's OK for Town to lie?
I lie as town pretty frequently.
I have in this game, in fact. Unless you think I was serious when I told Nero I was a Town Compulsive Self-targeting Friendly Neighbor.
That's what I've been saying.In post 1843, Wake1 wrote:I think Andre could be Scum as well seeing as we're at 74 pages and he only has 17 posts, but is Johnny on the Spot when called on lurking.
DO NOT TRUST TITUS TO SORT MATHBLADEIn post 1846, House wrote:trusting her to sort her brother
I didn't even realize that happened.In post 1890, Kerset wrote:When i vote CSF, no one cares. When CSF votes me then everyone speaks up.