Natural rvs joke.
In post 85, tictac wrote:speculation about possible scum-motivation/demotivation to get on a raid gonna be more useful
after
we see who joins
Reasonable reasons - town mindset.
In post 468, tictac wrote:
do ya have meta on Elsa? just looking for y/n here
pedit: o u answered by ninja
Amiable questioning, encouraging answers.
In post 476, tictac wrote:rce feels more connected/less abstracted than what i remember from scum him, but i may be tring time/exp there.
still would not be my first choice.
Applying meta, rational thinking.
In post 487, tictac wrote: In post 486, Qrow and Raven wrote: In post 478, tictac wrote: In post 158, Qrow and Raven wrote:(I don’t actually agree with Elsa FYI but that seems a little bit braver than I’d expect from scum)
i was misreading this as u saying u tr elsa for bravery, whinch would have been backwards.
Um. I'm pretty sure your "misread" was actually what I meant. Why did it feel backwards to you?
Qrow
scum elsa is very much not timid at all.
if anything i'd expect a lot more of the razzle-dazzle from scum-him
is that not ur exp with him then?
Excellent meta application of townniest degree.
In post 546, tictac wrote:vote is cuz disagreed w pretty much entire short iso, and
419 struck me as scummy-complaint to have.
second:
In post 2, GuyInFreezer wrote:If at least one member of the hostile factions are in the raid group, the said member will decide whether the raid succeeds or fail.
pedit @qrow
Casual tone, townity.
In post 922, tictac wrote: In post 917, Qrow and Raven wrote:I specifically said "first step" in quotation marks to indicate I wasn't trying to draw an exact parallel, but making a point that in any other game the elim is the first major decision of the game, but here it's raid entry
okay, that's not even where ur quotation marks are..
it's so easily checked, i dont even think u intentionally being deceptive, but I also don't think there was a pause for an introspection and a memory between the accusation and the response. it's like u on some weird autopilot.
the earlier thing was me thinking Raven not being aware of gamestart may be a towntell, and i do still think that, but oh man
Towning.
In post 1187, tictac wrote:
i tr that person, tho i haven't done a re-eval for a while.
also the disengage seems in line with how she was in sign-up thread.
@qrow: sure
Considering evaluations, townity.
In post 1680, tictac wrote: In post 1663, Qrow and Raven wrote: In post 1555, Mandelbrot wrote:There's not much pushback against TC or Mom votes.
It's possible that's because they're being bussed or their team is avoiding associatives in case of flip.
Idk.
I'll be reading the game closer starting on Friday.
- House
Yeah, that’s definitely concerning.
~R
there's kinda a lot of what could be cw attempts for a wagon that's existed for a rl-day. (mom)
dwle(mandelb,AA), AA(dwle,QR,mastina), wheme(thought there was someone trying this, but now i cant find it), QR(Cakes), Cakes(QR)
and defend-via-nullread from Elsa (twice)
townt townt twon
In post 2842, tictac wrote:i suppose so, i was thinking in terms of current comp.
I don't really trust you with it, if that is what you are asking.
pedit: @ Qrow
Accusations to the face, no fear city.
In post 3088, tictac wrote:hokay raven, here's the case on you.
day 1:
gamma: is familiar of elsas meta yet his day1 posting about elsa gives easy townpoints for stuff that is fully NAI for elsa (bravery, multiball spec). partner-read or attempt to pocket, currently leanin former.
raven: lied about doing an ISO on AA (described process is not how the site works)
day2:
gamma: was ok
raven: huge reaction to me saying I don't trust them doesn't match them insisting they didn't care if they were on the raid or not. said they wanted contributing slots on the raid, but was fully OK with Tomorrow being included, so I'm calling bull. admittedly I dunno what is the scum motivation to be on the raid given, that buddy already on it.
all of her focus on my read on her("what is tictacs threat-level?") and others reads on me("is he mislynchable?"), none of her focus on whether or not I was town ("
should
i be pushing tictac"), given that 2 slots were claiming info-that-makes-me-town, so its super not rocket-science that I in fact am.
TOWN
In post 3177, tictac wrote:
stand by this, and that track kinda wasted.
i don't mind him claiming tho.
Villaging.