In post 728, Toogeloo wrote:I'm still sick, and all I want to do is sleep when I'm not working.
@numberQ, have you thought I was scum since before Day 1 ended? The impression I was getting from you was you were setting me up as scum once the teams were scheduled by Baltar. I very rarely ever saw you talk about the possibility Darby might have been scum prior to the swap, and I don't think you've entertained implosion other than as wifom discussion from the swap.
@everyone, if I continue to feel like crap tomorrow, I'm probably going to need to request a replacement in fairness for people expecting a bit more WIM attitude from my slot.
Personal health comes first. Don't stick around if it's physically paining you. (Also don't take this as breaking the replacement discussion site rule, I'm not urging you to rep out or anything, just saying to take care of yourself)
To answer your question - you pinged me a little bit D1, but it wasn't anything concrete. I very much SRed DArby D1, but there wasn't much to go on so my analysis of the slot was short. And I TR implo by play, and now that I've realized (and people have pointed out) flaws in my original swap analysis, there's not as strong a reason to SR him by mech.
In post 730, Tanner wrote:ok, here's my thoughts. when you have 1 scum in 2 people, we can preflip some ideas as +scum without actually flipping anyone. what i mean is, if we find an idea that both of baltar and imaginality supported, we can assume that it's a pro-scum idea, because at least one scum was in favour of it. and i just realized that there is a funny coincidence here:
In post 314, imaginality wrote:@Tanner: you not wanting to go with numberQ and DArby makes me slightly suspicious that VP and I are both town and you're scum trying to get in with us so there's one scum among us. You saying DArby should be with VP and me if you're not doesn't do much to dissuade me from that concern.
That said, I kind of like the idea of you going to Gate with us because I think if you are town and get IC'ed you'd be a useful voice. And I think the same of VP and me, whereas DArby if town seems less useful if IC'ed.
For the same reason if VP and I are at the Wall I'd rather DArby is with us than you.
now, an exercise for the reader: if both of baltar and imaginality wanted either me or darby at the same location, and it's confirmed that i am town and that there is 1 scum in baltar/imaginality... what alignment does that make the darby slot?
I thiiiink I see what you're saying? Though it assumes scum and town would never come to the same +town conclusion together. Talk is cheap and scum could say things against their wincon just to look more town.
Although tbh I'm not sure I totally follow the logic in the first place. I might just need to reread it a few times lol
