My logic was/is:In post 329, MegAzumarill wrote:Because earlier I had originally presumed you were trying to get jesters to claim to freeze them and not lose using blatantly faulty logic. Now that that is clearly not the case I think you just wanted to be called out for that faulty logic
Scum and Jester both have reason to claim Jester
Town does not have reason to claim Jester
Eliminating the first two Jesters is safe
Eliminating a Jester claim hits maybe Scum, maybe Jester, but almost definitely not Town
Freezing claims is also a benefit, and why I wanted the claims to happen early, but I don't really understand what's wrong with the logic there