In post 1023, Andante wrote:why are we voting meg out before a replacement? not saying I'm opposed, but I just don't get why
Why would replacement matter? They are still scummy.
Like if Thanos replaced in and posted an 100 page essay i'd probably still think their predecessor was being pretty scummy so it's an good lim.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
To be fair, I am going to wait for a claim before booting them out.
But it just increased the likelihood of them being scum and they can be overwhelmed scum just as easily as overwhelmed town.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
No. Because they behaved more like frozen scum than lost town.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Mega kept reiterating they couldn't catch up to the game due to it's length, they kept excusing themselves by that. But they were clearly reading posts as evidenced by their immediate response to me calling them out for coasting.
So why couldn't they make at least a little bit of worthwhile contributions to the recent postings at least? Or share at least a single read? I think they were just scared, they felt lost in the big scary town and couldn't keep up with the knowledge that they are a dirty dirty scum and any mistake in their posts would get them speedlimmed.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 1033, Tet wrote:This defense just makes me want to flip Meg more.
I'm not defending, just questioning... cause there's nothing real significant from meg, and definitely reads as lost to me. Large games are a lot different than the smaller ones, I'm not stopping yall from voting, I just don't see the actual reasoning here
The thing about ircher is that I hate multiquote when it's responding to more than one person. My eyes just glaze over. And it's difficult to quote snip. I've read through his two wall multi-quotes though and they're on point, just not a lot of depth. But that's pot and kettle.
In post 1011, Roden wrote:We argued sure but I don't think we're on the same wavelength. I don't understand the crux of your argument, or at least I don't understand why you think my behavior comes from scum.
you said a thing, you backtracked on thing, instead of answering points against you, you discredited the argument which is something scum does because they can't argue normally because they come from a place of untruth. you dropped ATE which looks scummy as hell to try and divert suspicion off of you.
In post 1011, Roden wrote:The only thing I kind of get is the backtrack/backpedal argument but I don't really agree with it. I don't like the idea that backpedaling is scummy, it would be one thing if I never gave a solid read ever but that wasn't what happened. I gave some shotgun reads a little over 24 hours into the game and even said they weren't solid but wanted to get my starting thoughts out there. But I'm not going to be receptive to adjusting my reads or acknowledging a scum case on me, if the reaction to seeing me go back on a read is to call it backpedaling and tell me I'm scummy for backpedaling. Like, I'm just going to fight it and not even say I'm backpedaling if you're going to frame it as scummy, and it isn't really reasonable to believe I should react differently. I'm just never going say I'm doing "X Act" when someone says "X Act" is scummy, that's just my initial reaction to everything, if not outright arguing against the notion the "X Act" is scummy.
the point was to prove you were backpedalling, i don't really care how you fight it. saying x and y were related and then jumping back is testing the waters as scum and then realizing you made a mistake, that's the way i see it. town doesn't need to backpedal because they tell the truth
In post 1011, Roden wrote:Especially since it puts me in a situation where I'm being called scummy for backpedaling but also scummy for not admitting I'm backpedaling.
wrong. all you had to do was explain why you backpedaled. you failed to do that.