reread it, maybe I'm putting too much mental ehpasis on the sircakez bit. Noraas reaction is probably more non-ai then i was giving it credit for.In post 1288, Save The Dragons wrote:anything specific strike out at you? @grendal, re:noraa's reaction
yeah uh when i get back to my real computer i can give you those games remind me if i don't do it soon. i think roden was scum in 1 of them and town in 1 so who knows.
dannng bad? I feel like it's a good start!!! no way I'm sorting everyone on day 1 here thoughIn post 1304, Save The Dragons wrote:it's so bad there's no way scum would deign to be seen with it so you're probably town lol
fun takeIn post 1304, Save The Dragons wrote:it's so bad there's no way scum would deign to be seen with it so you're probably town lol
not gonna lie i haven't read a word either of those people said thus far yetIn post 1308, Save The Dragons wrote:it's not a bad start i guess but i feel like if you were scum you'd toss a couple of reads on some of the slots like roden or greeting that are readable at this point
Noraa looks like Noraa. Thats so shocking!!!!!! News to me. I didn't know my town game and scum game had similarities. Absolute bonkers!In post 1274, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Noraa looks EXACTLY like she looks as scum.
It's certainly an option, but just being an option doesn't mean it's actually the case.In post 1030, Andante wrote:like, sure there's nothing in meg's ISO, but could just be lost town? or is lost town not an option in yalls books?
I didn't think your initial posts and arguments were too scummy. As I mentioned before, I've seen plenty of stubborn town players that stick to their guns even when they are wrong. However, the continued focus on defending and arguing back in place of forming reads (that are not based entirely in OMGUS) strikes me as a tactic scum adopts. Not only is it distracting to the rest of the thread, it makes you look busy while in reality, you are just treading the same old ground again and again.In post 1069, Roden wrote:I can't really help you with your death tunnel at this point then.
I think that's just their style. I've played several games with Dunnstral both with him as town and as scum, and this seems pretty par for the course. They certainly could be scum, but it's hard to tell either way after you account for playstyle differences.In post 1132, Andante wrote:whereas if you just take 1 look at Arcade, Arcade screams maf...
I am still working on it unfortunately. I will have it by the end of Friday; I promise. You can lim me without hesitation if I don't follow through.In post 1158, Save The Dragons wrote:i wanna see ircher's readlist
It has indeed, back in 2016 for Newbie 1709. I'm glad to see you're still around!In post 1180, Grendel wrote:and Ircher I played a game with a LONG time ago.
Is andante bad scum?
I don't really know how to answer this because I don't think I do any certain noticeable things as scum that I wouldn't do if I were town. I think if anything, being informed makes me less concerned/stressed about appearances or what others think of me, because I know anyone who scum reads me kind of has a point. But if I'm town and getting scum read I also have to determine if if the scum read is genuine, a bad push from town, or a push from scum trying to take advantage of me, and that is just infinitely more stressful to me. Especially because even when I'm IC I've been hard pushed by scum and Vig'd by town, and I genuinely just have trouble reading people's intentions.In post 1121, Bell wrote:@roden, self meta. say as scum you'd be doing y, not x and say why you're town because you're doing z not w.
im not sure what that signals about your alignment if anything i just found it amusingIn post 1318, Ircher wrote:And your point is?
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=87368 roden scum and i scumread himIn post 1285, Grendel wrote:Oh Save the Dragons! You'd said prevously you had SR Rodan frequently in previous games. Is it ok to ask for some examples?
This doesn't make any sense. Am I not supposed to defend myself when I'm being accused? And at what point am I "treading the same ground again and again" when I'm not even the one bringing up those posts? You're acting like I'm going around picking fights, yet Ceph took a pot shot at me over a read Mastina made earlier and reignited our shit fight, and Val is scum reading me over a post I made almost a week ago while apparently have zero opinions on anything else that's happened even though he claimed to read the entire thread.In post 1312, Ircher wrote:I didn't think your initial posts and arguments were too scummy. As I mentioned before, I've seen plenty of stubborn town players that stick to their guns even when they are wrong. However, the continued focus on defending and arguing back in place of forming reads (that are not based entirely in OMGUS) strikes me as a tactic scum adopts. Not only is it distracting to the rest of the thread, it makes you look busy while in reality, you are just treading the same old ground again and again.In post 1069, Roden wrote:I can't really help you with your death tunnel at this point then.
