In post 757, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm stuck i think bugspray is more likely but i don't think they play that with their scumpartner but it could be they just play erratically always
Chalk it up to my relative inexperiance, but I think you are going to have to explain to me in small words how
a) that e-1 post makes a {Pooky, bugspray} team less likley, particulary if, as bugspray says, it's something they do basically every game then its NAI at best, given they would need to do so as either alignment else risk it being commented on
and b) if it is an actual anti-assocative, why that can be considered to overide all the other assocatives between bugspray and Three/Pooky - namely:
- the timing of 113, just as three (which we now know to be a scum PR) starts picking up votes.
- the fact that this is only engagement between the two slots pre-replacement, and that post-replacement, there is no engagment between Pooky/bugspray until the flip, excluding the bugspray onto Pooky vote with obvshit justification at 392
- zero progression between that "three town" post and that vote, particulary notable when Pookies ISO up to that point is purely them pushing the same scumread bugspray was
- the fact both slots were pushing the same slot(s), almost exclusivley apart from some early side-eyes from Pav, a slot that we now know is very likley to have been a mislim
because honestly, I don't see how it does. At all.
However, I am townreading STD, and they have been proven to have been right on the money with respect to the three slot early game, I have to accept I might be missing something here. Let's talk.
