In post 823, fireisredsir wrote:@FA, from an outside perspective (me), your reaction to eyes looked defensive. you made a big leap in assuming that because he welcomed you after talking about the replacements, he was suspecting you, and your interactions surrounding that all read as very reactive to that. it's not defensive in the sense of "you attacked me, so I will attack you for it", but it is defensive in the sense of reading something that wasn't an attack as if it was one, and jumping on him for it. i do not believe that you would have responded to his posts in the same way if you were not one of the parties involved, and you perceived an attack/suspicion from him, so thus it looks defensive. you can say that in your own head you weren't acting defensively, but the fact that it looked that way to me makes me believe that it would look that way to others, including nero.
nero is still voting hockey. i read the post in question (
694) as justifying him keeping his vote there, not the distancing as you claim. he's basically saying "yeah this doesn't really change things, scum could easily fakeclaim there. it might be technically best to hold off on the lim temporarily in case he is town pr". that's, like, an incredibly reasonable thing to say. i have no idea why it alarmed you so much. the fact that he has kept his vote there is the follow up that I think you're looking for, which is saying through his actions that he doesn't think the claim is currently enough to make him want to unvote
basically, i don't see your evidence as holding water, so i don't see his case as fabricated or fake
I would push it even more if it was just someone else and I wasn't involved in there. My scum hunting method is pretty simple: I look for inconsistencies and eyes had it. I was actually talking about how it's not an inherently scummy motivated action when he made the theory himself. I was mainly pushing the people who were reacting to eye.
Only when he claimed that he never meant to mention me as the main suspect of his theory did I vote for him and found it inconsistent. Literally anything before that can even be seen as me defending eye from others accusations as it was also seen and directly announced by dwelee
and no nero was voting hockey, saw the claim, said he finds more likely that scum claim pr but so is town, so lets kill him on later days and move on. for a half claimed "back up" claim that is not verifiable, not understandable and not informative in any way. And he kept his vote on that slot when saying it. It's just for one reason and can't have another motivation: distancing from whatever flip he will have while trying to stay consistent with his "read" on the slot. "Claims like that are most likely lies but they can be truth too" No. that's not an analysis. It's nothing. It's doing nothing on purpose and he is scum for it
