In post 555, Andante wrote:
Do you plan on doing anything except pretending to be maf and asking for votes? Cause honestly, Keeper is looking more like town than you
In post 454, Firebringer wrote: In post 451, Nero Cain wrote:So a hardclaimed gimmick alt is overusing thier gimmick after admitting that they'll be mostly gimmick playing. Yeah, not buying this thought procsess.
So u 100% think that keeper intended to play this game without giving any thoughts and just gimmick post instead of use gimmick as a way to deliver those thoughts in unique style.
I mean, I'd agree with it looking like Keeper has no intent to actually play thus far, but keeper is not alone. I have 4 names of people doing nothing/not even making an effort to play, so I have no interest in pushing this "GIMMICK = MAF" thing right now
In post 458, MagikHorse wrote:I don't think merely being a gimmick alt playing like a gimmick alt is really unusual? Sure, +scum points for the general lack of content, but if content is really what you're worried about they have been responding to questions so why not ask them what they think about a few things to try and pull some out?
They also said they do plan to do some solving in
214, so I don't even get why you claim they said they didn't intent to play the game.
I definitely agree with this, if you have an issue with keeper, why not try interacting with them?
You got Nero town from that? Please share more on that... I'm not seeing that from that exchange
lol jk, ok Tejate having the same question as me... very good look for Tejate!!! uhhh I didn't really feel aggro energy there tbh
In post 485, Nero Cain wrote:
Whats scummy about my recent posts?
if they are they why unvote?
if they aren't why are you questioning them?
I mean, I know you're not asking me this, but I did not view your posts as towny there, not saying they're scummy, but they definitely did not scream "TOWN" so that's where I'm confused why they made cat declare you as town, and now you defending that they were towny posts is like... what?? idk
In post 496, Nero Cain wrote:I mean, let's be serious, Keeper isn't making it to end game or anything but I absolutely do think that the reasoning Fire has presented for voting Keeper is erroneous and is thus likely scum that's just laying down an ez vote.
Yes, I agree with this. Not certain I'd declare keeper isn't going to endgame yet, but Fire is trying to take the easy path, avoid as little conflict/attention possible.. definitely not feeling towny
In post 515, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
This shtick is getting old
Not to mention, hopping off a wagon on someone you scumread is pretty bad when we should be forming wagons
I'm pretty certain Galron is actively playing against town, yes, it is HIGHLY annoying
In post 544, Galron wrote:Tejate wagon obv not going, and I'm not as sure about him as I was. Voting Frozen Angel was a decent thought when I was falling asleep, but not feeling it now.
UNVOTE: Voting Keepter as a PL, meh. I could go either way I guess. I don't like
340 and would like to see a better answer there.
I dunno. Tejate still seems scummy to me.
So if you have passion for a Tejate lim.. why have I seen 0 conviction for it in your lines? instead you're all "haha I'm maf" like, do you wonder why no one is listening to you? cause I think it's very obvious... go ISO yourself, and look at what we're dealing with
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Alright, should be pretty caught up. Tejate is not maf, and I think Galron is a better lim, I have a handful I'd be ok voting, but I will not vote out Tejate here
UNVOTE: Tejate
I'm working on not being a hyperposter, so yall get walls! Enjoy!
I feel pretty good about a Galron lim, like, the only other "wagon" I'd vote would be Frogster, other than that, I'm not a fan of anywhere else the votes are
VOTE: Galron