Individualist Norwee here.In post 373, bugspray wrote:the biggest problem is that people are disagreeing on an individualist or collectivist solution to the problem that this setup poses and people are just scumreading each other for it
I like this Chavela/HEM drama.In post 374, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i know but give me your version i guess. it's very hard to parse what you really think, because just moments ago, i thought you were townreading me.
Wait you townread me?In post 375, chavela wrote:like if you really want a readslist it'd be something like
meuh
norwegianboy
pav
tris, greeting
humaneatingmonkey
andante, bugspray
enchant
What is neurotypical? Never heard that before.In post 384, bugspray wrote:shiki is already uncomfortable making tierlist in the first place can you fuck off with this neurotypical bullshit? not everyone thinks about thinks the same way as youIn post 376, humaneatingmonkey wrote:okay let's talk about why they're tiered that way
*Stock puke sound effect*In post 394, humaneatingmonkey wrote:yeah i didn't list enchant i forgot to bring them in their own tier (the bottom)In post 392, chavela wrote:you currently think i am one of the very most likely mafias? even though you think i would be playing impressively if mafia, and! my play does not resemble any of my past play as mafia to you? and! there isn't something i've done you felt was +mafia just that you think everything i've done is 'within my range' which in this case based on your stated view of me when you entered i am assuming is near infinite, so mostly it is just, scum because could be scum because can always be scum, which, like, ...
(i am assuming enchant would be at the bottom even though you failed to list enchant? which is probably +partner in a vacuum)
i can't explain it yet but the mood shift you had from pages ago when you declared you would want to stay in the game to solve it and that you don't think mechanical play is the way, then the incongruence when you became upset that i wouldn't trust you and advance the game mechanically... is noteworthy.
also yes, i think you're one of the most likely mafias thus far.
Not sure i get this progressive activist pressure thing, but i can agree that Bugspray has not felt townie this game.In post 396, humaneatingmonkey wrote:behind bugspray, of course.
bugspray has hit several scum pings from me since early game.
oh, and i'm not pulling #385 out of my ass. bugspray has used progressive activist pressure to advance in the game before.
see here when i was their partner before. the tactic was they would call me out for misgendering so we can have negative scum equity.
also, bugspray does gotcha moves as scum. he did that against boy from norway.
not really seeing them trying to solve the game, as well.
This post felt very lamist.In post 97, bugspray wrote:damn it's really hard to actuall yget good reads on people this game because town and scum have the same goal
I think they have been pretty obviously town.In post 432, humaneatingmonkey wrote:what's so bad about it
This frustration is town indicative, but it’s just one of the many towntells he’s shown off so far.In post 406, chavela wrote:because i become less useful when i am frustrated?In post 402, humaneatingmonkey wrote:how does being scumread stop your goal of staying in the game for longer and solving the game?
and! it becomes less enjoyable for me
when i am frustrated?
like i said when i said maybe i just find a town
I would trust them, yes.In post 439, humaneatingmonkey wrote:would you trust her?
It does help in confirming my read on them but making me more paranoid about u, yes.In post 422, bugspray wrote:alright i hope this helps
HEAL: chevre
[/vote]chevre[/vote]
I trust chevre.
Annoying because they are the scummiest play in history, but i could see them playing like this as town.
Trusting townreads is not scummiest play in history.In post 445, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Annoying because they are the scummiest play in history, but i could see them playing like this as town.