Large Normal 238 | Weiqi, Baduk, Go | Endgame

[April Ludgate]

Gun to my head Eyes Galron Tene April is my solve

Galron and I are confirmed not scum together, btw.

[April Ludgate]

Psychologist inno + TA inno

So there isn't any combination with STD/April/DV/Galron based on Fire and Yeet Night actions.

[MathBlade]

Psychologist inno + TA inno

So there isn't any combination with STD/April/DV/Galron based on Fire and Yeet Night actions.

There is if Galron is group scum who did the kill N1

[April Ludgate]

So Scorpious Galron eyes and a traitor April
Or Frogger tene eyes and a traitor April makes the most sense

The problem is both solves suck

DV doesn’t want the latter town reading Tene
And the former has us have to hit scorpious which is bad.

And I kinda think it’s the former

Okay, you realize the wagons I'm leaning today are Frogster, Scorp, and Eyes, right? Galron/Me are impossible.

You actively just want me to be scum.

No meta with me, not even the self meta I push out.

I use self meta both alignments, and every self meta, either alignment, I say is always something that you can know that I believe to be true. any alignment.

[April Ludgate]

Psychologist inno + TA inno

So there isn't any combination with STD/April/DV/Galron based on Fire and Yeet Night actions.

There is if Galron is group scum who did the kill N1

He can't. Yeet cleared Galron of being Groupscum.

Yeet's role said had the potential to make a night kill.

[DeasVail]

I’m happy considering Scorp today. I guess Frogster’s pop in doesn’t really make me confident in my previous townread there, nor does eyes’ play feel town.

As for Tene, a lot of their posts seem like things that scum would stop themselves from saying. There’s an unfiltered element to the way they’re expressing their thoughts that does not feel fabricated.

Scorpious Galron Eyes April.

Ignore mechanics: Is this viable to you?

No

[April Ludgate]

Scorp/Frogster/Eyes/Tene have all the Group Scum in them, could have the traitor, doesnt have to.

STD/Galron/April/DV cannot be scum together, and if scum, HAVE to be traitor.

[MathBlade]

Psychologist inno + TA inno

So there isn't any combination with STD/April/DV/Galron based on Fire and Yeet Night actions.

There is if Galron is group scum who did the kill N1

He can't. Yeet cleared Galron of being Groupscum.

Yeet's role said had the potential to make a night kill.

That’s inaccurate though

[MathBlade]

I’m happy considering Scorp today. I guess Frogster’s pop in doesn’t really make me confident in my previous townread there, nor does eyes’ play feel town.

As for Tene, a lot of their posts seem like things that scum would stop themselves from saying. There’s an unfiltered element to the way they’re expressing their thoughts that does not feel fabricated.

Scorpious Galron Eyes April.

Ignore mechanics: Is this viable to you?

No

Why not?

[DeasVail]

Psychologist inno + TA inno

So there isn't any combination with STD/April/DV/Galron based on Fire and Yeet Night actions.

There is if Galron is group scum who did the kill N1

He can't. Yeet cleared Galron of being Groupscum.

Yeet's role said had the potential to make a night kill.

The role PM is not totally clear, but my understanding is that Yeet will have received an “x is not capable of killing or has already killed” result

[DeasVail]

I’m happy considering Scorp today. I guess Frogster’s pop in doesn’t really make me confident in my previous townread there, nor does eyes’ play feel town.

As for Tene, a lot of their posts seem like things that scum would stop themselves from saying. There’s an unfiltered element to the way they’re expressing their thoughts that does not feel fabricated.

Scorpious Galron Eyes April.

Ignore mechanics: Is this viable to you?

No

Why not?

Ignore my answer

[April Ludgate]

im personally starting to town read Tene this day phase and after everything.

@Tene - would you be willing to claim now? i think might as well have everyone's role.

[MathBlade]

Yeet

has been found dead. He was a

Town 3-Shot Psychologist

Yeet

You are a

Town 3-Shot Psychologist

Each day you may talk in the game thread and vote on who to eliminate.

Three times during the game you may visit a player at night to investigate their ability to kill. Assuming no interference, you will be informed "PLAYERNAME is capable of killing.", "PLAYERNAME is not capable of killing or has already killed.", or "You got no result from investigating PLAYERNAME." at the end of the night. Players capable of killing are members of the

Mafia

other than

Traitors

,

Serial Killers

and

Vigilantes

who have not yet killed

You win when all threats to the town are dead, and at least 1 town aligned player is alive.

The game thread is here, please confirm your role and alignment via pm.

Yeet got “Galron is not capable of killing or already has killed”

This means Galron is town or traitor or group scum who killed N1

[DeasVail]

Sorry, a snarky way of proving my point, but I think asking me to ignore a fundamental part of viability when asking me about viability is a bit difficult

[April Ludgate]

Yeet

has been found dead. He was a

Town 3-Shot Psychologist

Yeet

You are a

Town 3-Shot Psychologist

Each day you may talk in the game thread and vote on who to eliminate.

Three times during the game you may visit a player at night to investigate their ability to kill. Assuming no interference, you will be informed "PLAYERNAME is capable of killing.", "PLAYERNAME is not capable of killing or has already killed.", or "You got no result from investigating PLAYERNAME." at the end of the night. Players capable of killing are members of the

Mafia

other than

Traitors

,

Serial Killers

and

Vigilantes

who have not yet killed

You win when all threats to the town are dead, and at least 1 town aligned player is alive.

The game thread is here, please confirm your role and alignment via pm.

Yeet got “Galron is not capable of killing or already has killed”

This means Galron is town or traitor or group scum who killed N1

hmm, yeah, that looks possible. this changes a few things.

was Skitter in the game Night 1?

[April Ludgate]

Log

Scorp/Frogster/Eyes/Tene have all the Group Scum in them, could have the traitor, doesnt have to.

STD/April/DV cannot be scum together, and if scum, HAVE to be traitor.

Galron can be traitor or Groupscum if they made Night 1 kill.

[MathBlade]

Yeet

has been found dead. He was a

Town 3-Shot Psychologist

Yeet

You are a

Town 3-Shot Psychologist

Each day you may talk in the game thread and vote on who to eliminate.

Three times during the game you may visit a player at night to investigate their ability to kill. Assuming no interference, you will be informed "PLAYERNAME is capable of killing.", "PLAYERNAME is not capable of killing or has already killed.", or "You got no result from investigating PLAYERNAME." at the end of the night. Players capable of killing are members of the

Mafia

other than

Traitors

,

Serial Killers

and

Vigilantes

who have not yet killed

You win when all threats to the town are dead, and at least 1 town aligned player is alive.

The game thread is here, please confirm your role and alignment via pm.

Yeet got “Galron is not capable of killing or already has killed”

This means Galron is town or traitor or group scum who killed N1

hmm, yeah, that looks possible. this changes a few things.

was Skitter in the game Night 1?

Sorry, a snarky way of proving my point, but I think asking me to ignore a fundamental part of viability when asking me about viability is a bit difficult

I don’t follow your point.

Mechanically my solution is possible.

I am asking if it makes sense by play

[MathBlade]

And yes skitter was in the game N1

[April Ludgate]

Alright, well, ill be back sometime. Gotta go do a fiverr gig.

[April Ludgate]

might be tomorrow

[DeasVail]

Yeet

has been found dead. He was a

Town 3-Shot Psychologist

Yeet

You are a

Town 3-Shot Psychologist

Each day you may talk in the game thread and vote on who to eliminate.

Three times during the game you may visit a player at night to investigate their ability to kill. Assuming no interference, you will be informed "PLAYERNAME is capable of killing.", "PLAYERNAME is not capable of killing or has already killed.", or "You got no result from investigating PLAYERNAME." at the end of the night. Players capable of killing are members of the

Mafia

other than

Traitors

,

Serial Killers

and

Vigilantes

who have not yet killed

You win when all threats to the town are dead, and at least 1 town aligned player is alive.

The game thread is here, please confirm your role and alignment via pm.

Yeet got “Galron is not capable of killing or already has killed”

This means Galron is town or traitor or group scum who killed N1

hmm, yeah, that looks possible. this changes a few things.

was Skitter in the game Night 1?

Sorry, a snarky way of proving my point, but I think asking me to ignore a fundamental part of viability when asking me about viability is a bit difficult

I don’t follow your point.

Mechanically my solution is possible.

I am asking if it makes sense by play

I’m not sure that April is scum. I won’t absolutely rule it out, but I don’t think their play makes that much sense for scum. It’s very loud and controversial and I guess I don’t have the same expectation of FL/Boon being right in reads that you do

[MathBlade]

What about the other three then?

[DeasVail]

What about the other three then?

Yes definitely

[MathBlade]

What about the other three then?

Yes definitely

Then what if we do those first three?

Ignore April town or scum. If April is scum then in theory it’s gg?

We do eyes then Scorpious then Galron?

[DeasVail]

Can you remind me what makes Frogster town in your mind?