so it's a serious vote then yea? why did you want to push the wagon to L-2 so early?
Because I felt like it, and I am not you, so your implication that this is "bad" does not affect my play. It was enough that I announced L-2. You're welcome.
townies have reasons for things they do. or sometimes, they dont! and you can just say that. on the other hand, scum's reason for doing things is usually to either 1) appear town or 2) kill townies. i think I know why you voted Radical Rat. and I'm giving you a chance to give your side. if your side of it is that there was no particular reasoning, then thats ok! but thats not what youre telling me. youre just getting weirdly defensive and cagey and refusing to be open to having your actions observed and analyzed. so what is it that you're hiding?
It would be indeed good if you tell us the reason. I have to agree with the bulge here. On the other hand, bulge, what's your stance on the radical rat post?
The point is that RR explicitly is trying to fish a claim out of me - something I obviously refuse to do on page 1. I want people to reach their
own
conclusions, and not just ones fed to them by me.
I am noting that you are
continuing
to make subtle accusations at me as if I am wolfy without explicitly saying so. First you noted the L-2 thing and now you are saying that my choice to not share a reason was also wolfy. I'd like you to either speak plainly on how you stand on my slot, or at least knock off this kind of subtle shade.
The point is that RR explicitly is trying to fish a claim out of me - something I obviously refuse to do on page 1. I want people to reach their
own
conclusions, and not just ones fed to them by me.
I am noting that you are
continuing
to make subtle accusations at me as if I am wolfy without explicitly saying so. First you noted the L-2 thing and now you are saying that my choice to not share a reason was also wolfy. I'd like you to either speak plainly on how you stand on my slot, or at least knock off this kind of subtle shade.
You're on my radar.
idk why it matters whether or not i explicitly state my read to you when my line of questioning was pretty clearly born of suspicion. context clues, yall.
In post 27, Not Known 15 wrote:It would be indeed good if you tell us the reason. I have to agree with the bulge here. On the other hand, bulge, what's your stance on the radical rat post?
In post 27, Not Known 15 wrote:It would be indeed good if you tell us the reason. I have to agree with the bulge here. On the other hand, bulge, what's your stance on the radical rat post?
i don't think it was all that scummy
Why was that not scummy, but my actions worth questioning?
Seems like you are treating me differently than RR here.
Aye, until the added sentence in the post below.
That one is defensive and very image-conscious. That's scummy.
Who taught you to play mafia?
Being defensive and image conscious are not wolfy on their own. It is if it is absent in the player's town game, but it can very well be something present in both, particularly in high level players who are aware of their position at the table.
Aye, until the added sentence in the post below.
That one is defensive and very image-conscious. That's scummy.
Who taught you to play mafia?
Being defensive and image conscious are not wolfy on their own. It is if it is absent in the player's town game, but it can very well be something present in both, particularly in high level players who are aware of their position at the table.
Yes, they are wolfy on their own. Scum players tend to do this more than town players, on average.
Aye, until the added sentence in the post below.
That one is defensive and very image-conscious. That's scummy.
Who taught you to play mafia?
Being defensive and image conscious are not wolfy on their own. It is if it is absent in the player's town game, but it can very well be something present in both, particularly in high level players who are aware of their position at the table.
Yes, they are wolfy on their own. Scum players tend to do this more than town players, on average.
You just contradicted yourself, you admitted that this can be present in villa play, ergo, it is not strictly wolf indicative and requires nuance. Unless you consider mafia to be an RNG game where you play for odds, in which case I think we will have much disagreement. You should consider reading your own words and the implications of them before you hit send so you don't make such foolish statements in the future.
On the bright side, I villa read you so that pleases me I can largely ignore you from this point forward.
Aye, until the added sentence in the post below.
That one is defensive and very image-conscious. That's scummy.
Who taught you to play mafia?
Being defensive and image conscious are not wolfy on their own. It is if it is absent in the player's town game, but it can very well be something present in both, particularly in high level players who are aware of their position at the table.
Yes, they are wolfy on their own. Scum players tend to do this more than town players, on average.
You just contradicted yourself, you admitted that this can be present in villa play, ergo, it is not strictly wolf indicative and requires nuance. Unless you consider mafia to be an RNG game where you play for odds, in which case I think we will have much disagreement. You should consider reading your own words and the implications of them before you hit send so you don't make such foolish statements in the future.
On the bright side, I villa read you so that pleases me I can largely ignore you from this point forward.
Nearly nothing is strictly wolf indicative. That's why misyeets happen.
In post 27, Not Known 15 wrote:It would be indeed good if you tell us the reason. I have to agree with the bulge here. On the other hand, bulge, what's your stance on the radical rat post?
i don't think it was all that scummy
Why was that not scummy, but my actions worth questioning?
Seems like you are treating me differently than RR here.
