your question of "do you think you will survive night one?"
felt like you were telling me you would murder us at night.(I imagine it would be a vig or a delayed day-poison?)
You would do it because you think we are mafia.
-A
I guess Flea predicting a mayhem night one might early in this game might have played a part in this, too. This to me indicated a night activity of some sorts from Fleas side (pontentially a n1 vig, too?). As far as i remember, this was mentioned earlier and so far not denied by Flea. Did fea (I hope I used the right pronoun here) forget, that fea hinted at a claim earlier and tries to deny it now?
This feels kind of strange. Not enough to put my vote there (yes, I try to be careful with my votes), but Flea is clearly on my list of possible scummies now.
Near enough for me.
The thing is I'm not going to confirm or deny anything.
I saw 2 N1 vig claims, an aesetic claim and I can't remember if the now retracted lightning rod claim was around that time.
These games are also always beautifully chaotic.
So you tell me, am I claiming something? Or am I throwing up dust against the scum to cloud who their shot should be?
Everyone on this list bar you and Ari have played with me before, everyone knows what I bring and that what I bring ebbs and flows with my mood.
Lets go back to the post you quoted, what do you see there, Kenny?
The lightning rod claim was retraced at the time of your "mayhem post" and the ascetic claim not yet there. Both facts don't matter though (I guess), because I don't see how an ascetic could cause mayhem n1 and in the Enchant claim/retract I am not too sure which is serious and which is for the lolz.
It all looked like a hint of a claim to me. As to what your motive for that was, I am not sure. Could be throwing dust at scum. Could be you are what you hint to be and hope that scum thinks you are throwing dust at them. Could be scum throwing dust at town. ...
Going back to the post I quoted I see a conclusion that is potentially false (thanks for making me look again. Didn't see it the first time). Your question "Do you think you're going to survive N1?" could have many directions. LaL not surviving n1 could have many causes:
a) You being vig and thinking LaL is scum. (I don't see why you would ask this question if you intended to do so)
b) Any other vig having the same thought process (for example Koba, despite the holstering claim).
c) Any vig who had enough of the LaL/Koba thing and wants to get rid of at least one of them.
d) Scum getting rid of one player. (Everyone can go through her/his/their/faer own list of why scum would do this. There are too many potential options I have time for right now)
In post 559, Logic and Literature wrote:I have slight pangs of paranoia that the reason Titus is ok with anti-spewing directly is because her partner is located in a decent position.
However I don't think it's something we can deal with today.
In post 569, Flea The Magician wrote:I strongly doubt everyone is a vigilante, because that is breakable just by getting everyone to shoot one above/below them.
I wouldn't put it past scum to be BP.
But we do have a claimed asectic.
Well it all really depends on the amount of vigs that town has. But there is the possibility that it works out for town to shoot in pairings or blocks. Generally speaking.
In post 556, DkKoba wrote:RCE is my strongest townread to the point that if a cop claims to have a guilty on him- lim the cop first
I agree with the RCE read but this feels like refuge in audacity.
How?
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
She's just trying to turn it around on any LHF she can atp :p
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
Me: has moved L/L slot up my PoE(still bottom 3) and am satisfied pushing Worst slot as the bottom of it
Everyone else: lets wagon the slot now
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
In post 585, DkKoba wrote:Me: has moved L/L slot up my PoE(still bottom 3) and am satisfied pushing Worst slot as the bottom of it
Everyone else: lets wagon the slot now
hehe
if I get flipped today you don't get to say you were right about me being town
I think L/L is very likely town based on the claim.
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
is there a condensed list of all the claims anywhere?
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
DUCK ARE YOU A VANILLA TOWNIE? PLEASE TELL ME I WON'T BE THE ONLY ONE HIDING UNDER MY COVERS STRESS EATING TONIGHR
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
retired
