Priority 1:
Ircher - S_S:
Ircher ISO
44, agreement to reads list from townie that has S_S and themself as top towns.
57, “content of the reads that matter” never contextualises why the content from Tracer Bullet is town indicative
297 no mention or quoting of any post made by S_S. Every single other user in the game other than S_S mentioned. (7 out of 8)
S_S ISO
Nothing worth mentioning other than that Ircher isn’t a topic they have brought up at all, but they do quote or mention Worst and Tracer. Short ISO with not much actual content yet.
Ircher has been a major topic in thread but they have yet to make an stance on them which could be because of reluctance to make one. Cross-checked whether they have made stances on other players, and that list includes: Worst, RCE, only.
Likelihood of scum association: Present
Ircher - Tracer
Ircher ISO
44, Calling Tracer immediately town for their reads that has them in light town. Very obvious anti-associative action between the two.
57 and 128, handwaving/explanation attempt. “Content of the reads make them town” “Colour-coding” Obvious BS. Not likely scum/scum because of how lazy it is.
130, “If Tracer is truly Pooky”. Could be distancing but i believe it’s genuine they aren’t sure of the slots true identity. They’d prob know more for sure if scum/scum so another anti-associative.
297, Reassuring Tracer that putting someone to E-1 isn’t bad. Anti-associative.
Tracer ISO
35, townleans Ircher. No comment.
112 and 113, Suggests same read as Ircher (Norwee scum) but also says it seems “too easy”, not setting up their scum partner for success if they are both scum trying to elim me. Also not likely a distancing attempt because it’s kinda obscure. Anti-associative.
157, still townleans Ircher. No change.
In general: Not much mention of Ircher, keeps them at light-town but performs actions that seem to be based on an independence and lack of care for Irchers slot in general. Which points more to lack of association.
Likelihood of scum association: No.
Ircher - Worst
Ircher ISO
44, agreement to reads list from townie that has Worst and themself as top towns.
297, Slight shade on Worst, calling them out for not “following their instincts”, bit of wtf comment if scum/scum.
304, “It’s clear you’re assuming the worst of me” Oh my god, what a crumb! (Ok no, this isn’t relevant whatsoever.)
Worst ISO
63, 70 and 73, Starts up the game with a lot of defence of Ircher, instead of subtly trying to redirect the wagon and also make sure to not destroy their own slot in the case of an Ircher!scumflip they go all in and say it is 0% chance it will hit scum when Ircher already has some votes. This is only scum/scum if Worst is power-wolfing. A playstyle I do not recognize to be a part of their game under any circumstance. Anti-associative.
Also worth mentioning that 73, 83 and 178 are probably genuine reads made from someone that believes what they are saying even if it’s likely wrong in my opinion. I townread those posts in retrospect, which makes Worst even less likely to be scum with any slot here.
96, mention of Ircher but never explains the meaning.
Likelihood of scum association: No.
###
Priority 2:
Tracer - S_S
Tracer ISO
35, Reads list with S_S as top town.
157, reads with S_S now as null. Significant change from previous reads list. Indication of reason of change during the time between is not present.
184 Asks S_S if they are ok 6 minutes after S_S posted 5 previous posts with no mention of Tracer. Curious.
250 Asks S_S to elaborate their reasoning for “town reading RCE but for an different reason.
In general: Nothing really significantly pointing to this either being or not being scum/scum interactions. But lack of anything conclusive probably points to not scum/scum.
S_S ISO
45 and 87, Calls Tracer Pooky. Can be inferred from Tracer’s profile at the time. Nothing relevant.
252, S_S answering a directly asked question from Tracer. I have no real conclusion here.
Likelihood of scum association: Low, but not conclusive.
Worst - S_S
Worst ISO
202, asks why Wallflower townreads S_S.
204, mentions “they can sense S_S is town” but they are also not too sure.
In general: Nothing really pointing one way or the other. No conclusion to make.
S_S ISO
180 and 181, One of the only reads S_S makes, explains that they have reason to townread Worst because they seem different in this game from previous game together where Worst was scum. Also says their read might be a giant reach and inserts a meme picture to go along with it. Pretty strange read to make if partnered as it doesn’t seem to have an agenda other than making a read for the sake of making an read on The Worst. I don’t think S_S would have posted this if scum partners. Although the post is kinda scummy from S_S to begin with. Seems like the sort of fake read scum makes to seem like they are solving, but is also easy to make because pointing out that a player that was scum in a previous game is now acting differently in “new game” as scum is super easy. Anti-associative.
Likelihood of scum association: No.
Tracer - Worst
Tracer ISO
35, Has Worst as top townread.
53, Incredibly brazen post to make if associated. Calls out the fact that they are indicating a townread on Worst even though they haven’t posted and asking why nobody is mentioning this. Anti-assocative.
157, Now has Worst as null. Significant change from previous reads list. The reason for the change is not obvious.
Worst ISO
137, Votes Tracer
175, their next post. Asks if they should sheep Tracer whom they previously voted for or Wallflower?? Anti-associative.
270, Hmm I don't understand this post. But it's probably not important.
Likelihood of scum association: No.