[2] ShadowGirl: Roden, DkKoba
[3] Not voting: MathBlade, tictac, Enchant
With 7 players alive, 4 votes are needed for an elimination.
D3: deadline: (expired on 2022-04-15 04:25:15)
Is this the only link that you've made up? Do you actually have any case against me? Do you have any opinions on the other two players or only me, because I currently have votes?In post 1882, MathBlade wrote:Cool Koba traitor with Shadowgirl looks real legit due to Rule of 3In post 1490, DkKoba wrote:this is why i outted you roden rofl
I have 0 patience for clears who play like you do when im busy fucking up scum
My legacy is tictac + chaos, if either are a miss, shadowgirl should be a hit.
I find it shady that you're trying to put all of the responsibility of the (mis)elimination choice on Roden so that your hands are clean.In post 1905, MathBlade wrote:viewtopic.php?f=2&t=87284&user_select%5B%5D=32319In post 1902, tictac wrote:i'm not in a hurryIn post 1899, MathBlade wrote:I have to head to a dr appt but I repped into a game where I was traitor scum and had a hood with my buddy.In post 1898, tictac wrote:doesn't seem to me a thing that might exist.In post 1892, MathBlade wrote:two scum hood
can u cite a game where one did?
There you go
Like I am much more sure on Koba but will compromise to where Roden wants.
Greeting pushed Dwlee based no actual read information. They could not give me any reasoning as to why they believed DkKoba's claim, as if they knew Dwlee was going to flip scum and could be certain of the town cred so they had no need to actually say anything.In post 1704, Roden wrote:Meant to add: who would benefit from pushing Dwlee now?In post 1703, Roden wrote:No, it was to fake spew Dwlee as town. I faked a slip to draw attention away from my scum buddies and create fake associatives with town. I mainly did so because my slot was doomed even if I bussed Dwlee, but it wasn't true the other way around.
This isn't happening with you vs Dwlee because you both opened today attacking each other. If Dwlee is scum I think it's reasonable to think they would try to fake spew.
But Greeting gave no reasoning for their belief. There was no mention of hood, or meta, or anything. I'm not calling them scummy because they didn't give an essay. They gave zero reasoning. Nor did they provide any reads about anyone else other than saying that Roden is town because he's a mason. They provided no reads content at all.In post 1929, Enchant wrote:Idk i am not on like people with long reads and reasonings why they vote, just for sake of kill of blatant maf.
So by your own logic they should have been able to give come up with at least one thing to say as a read on them.In post 1931, Enchant wrote:Because Dwlee was blatant evil for everyone who can answer "2+2"
Also answer is 5.
This is actually why I'm currently pushing Shadow.In post 1929, Enchant wrote:Idk i am not on like people with long reads and reasonings why they vote, just for sake of kill of blatant maf.
I'm not going to let lurk scum get off easy. It was a struggle to get Chaos to say anything and there has been no reads content from that slot since then.In post 1935, Roden wrote:This is actually why I'm currently pushing Shadow.In post 1929, Enchant wrote:Idk i am not on like people with long reads and reasonings why they vote, just for sake of kill of blatant maf.
Ahh then it’s me who has things OOO.In post 1924, Roden wrote:In post 1919, DkKoba wrote:Mathblade, why are you hard softing vig?Koba crumbed Day 1 that they had already discussed the possibility of me and GL being Masons.In post 1912, MathBlade wrote:You have your OOO wrong Roden
Dwlee claimed Koba ignoring then Koba claimed mason open in the thread
This gives scum kill cover and allows reaction testing for the second masons as evidenced by lack of mason death scum didnt know
I am not sure what you’re talking about with “made up link”. I didn’t post any hyperlinks. I suspect Koba. Koba listed three people who could be scum. More often than not one of those three is scum. Is it foolproof, no? Is it a good place to start when I haven’t read? Yes.In post 1926, ShadowGirl wrote:Is this the only link that you've made up? Do you actually have any case against me? Do you have any opinions on the other two players or only me, because I currently have votes?In post 1882, MathBlade wrote:Cool Koba traitor with Shadowgirl looks real legit due to Rule of 3In post 1490, DkKoba wrote:this is why i outted you roden rofl
I have 0 patience for clears who play like you do when im busy fucking up scum
My legacy is tictac + chaos, if either are a miss, shadowgirl should be a hit.
I find it shady that you're trying to put all of the responsibility of the (mis)elimination choice on Roden so that your hands are clean.In post 1905, MathBlade wrote:viewtopic.php?f=2&t=87284&user_select%5B%5D=32319In post 1902, tictac wrote:i'm not in a hurryIn post 1899, MathBlade wrote:I have to head to a dr appt but I repped into a game where I was traitor scum and had a hood with my buddy.In post 1898, tictac wrote:doesn't seem to me a thing that might exist.In post 1892, MathBlade wrote:two scum hood
can u cite a game where one did?
There you go
Like I am much more sure on Koba but will compromise to where Roden wants.
Greeting pushed Dwlee based no actual read information. They could not give me any reasoning as to why they believed DkKoba's claim, as if they knew Dwlee was going to flip scum and could be certain of the town cred so they had no need to actually say anything.In post 1704, Roden wrote:Meant to add: who would benefit from pushing Dwlee now?In post 1703, Roden wrote:No, it was to fake spew Dwlee as town. I faked a slip to draw attention away from my scum buddies and create fake associatives with town. I mainly did so because my slot was doomed even if I bussed Dwlee, but it wasn't true the other way around.
This isn't happening with you vs Dwlee because you both opened today attacking each other. If Dwlee is scum I think it's reasonable to think they would try to fake spew.
There has been next to no productive content from the lurky Chaos/Greeting/NM slot. What has Greeting and NM contributed at all?
I am confused by this topic. Can someone eli5?In post 1935, Roden wrote:This is actually why I'm currently pushing Shadow.In post 1929, Enchant wrote:Idk i am not on like people with long reads and reasonings why they vote, just for sake of kill of blatant maf.
I think if Koba is scum and Shadow flips town, then they still lose in ELO. We have too many clears for them to survive a vote at that point. Plus I don't see why Koba doesn't NK me if they're scum.In post 1938, MathBlade wrote:Ahh then it’s me who has things OOO.In post 1924, Roden wrote:In post 1919, DkKoba wrote:Mathblade, why are you hard softing vig?Koba crumbed Day 1 that they had already discussed the possibility of me and GL being Masons.In post 1912, MathBlade wrote:You have your OOO wrong Roden
Dwlee claimed Koba ignoring then Koba claimed mason open in the thread
This gives scum kill cover and allows reaction testing for the second masons as evidenced by lack of mason death scum didnt know
I still find Koba sus but it’s not as airtight as I thought.
Can you elaborate the clears? I only know of you and the vig whoever they are.In post 1941, Roden wrote:I think if Koba is scum and Shadow flips town, then they still lose in ELO. We have too many clears for them to survive a vote at that point. Plus I don't see why Koba doesn't NK me if they're scum.In post 1938, MathBlade wrote:Ahh then it’s me who has things OOO.In post 1924, Roden wrote:In post 1919, DkKoba wrote:Mathblade, why are you hard softing vig?Koba crumbed Day 1 that they had already discussed the possibility of me and GL being Masons.In post 1912, MathBlade wrote:You have your OOO wrong Roden
Dwlee claimed Koba ignoring then Koba claimed mason open in the thread
This gives scum kill cover and allows reaction testing for the second masons as evidenced by lack of mason death scum didnt know
I still find Koba sus but it’s not as airtight as I thought.
You want to vote me out based on that you think Koba is scum. So why are you not voting Koba right now? That's why it's a made up link because you don't actually have any case against me, other than supposing that I am scum with Koba - based on what?In post 1939, MathBlade wrote:I am not sure what you’re talking about with “made up link”. I didn’t post any hyperlinks. I suspect Koba. Koba listed three people who could be scum. More often than not one of those three is scum. Is it foolproof, no? Is it a good place to start when I haven’t read? Yes.
I am not putting all responsibility on Roden. I am merely deferring to the person who is read and town. I don’t have a good reason you’re town and you’re a viable partner of Koba’s so compromising here makes sense until I can read the game especially when it might be elo.
That slot - Chaos - was my preferred D1 elimination. I was pushing that slot on D1, so it is not that I suddenly decided that they were scummy on D2. And of course as town I want to get more info for town, particularly from the slot that did so little in D1 and was doing nothing in D2.In post 1937, Roden wrote:I meant your posts regarding Dwlee.
They knew Koba was going to push them on Day 2 if one of the suspected Masons died. They also knew they'd likely lose a 1v1 with Koba, since Koba's good at throwing their weight around and pushing elims through + they were generally more town read. So if they know they're going down, I feel confident they're gonna tell their scum buddies to bus and get as much town cred as they can possibly get from their elim. Which is why I think it's telling that you tried to solve and incriminate Dwlee more than anyone else.
Your push on the Greeting slot is scummy because it's the perfect position for a deep wolf to take. You're on the wagon but shading Greeting for being "too confident" that Dwlee flips red. It sets you up to have a reason to push the slot and look solvey going into the next day.
For today being ELO is the math that there's 1 traitor + 1 scum left and then if there's a mislim today and then the vig also shooting wrong in the night?In post 1947, MathBlade wrote:This if my theory is correct would also be elo. However my theory may not be correct so I want time to validate and see it.