In post 36, geraintm wrote:@meuh
So...I have a way if random voting in every single game I play. Scorpious wanted me to break that pattern because they didn't want to go to 4 votes so quickly, but I ain't breaking my method for them. You can call it shutting down the conversation, but my last game had scorpious in it and they know elegantly what I was going to do
How many games have you played with him?In post 42, Scorpious wrote:Get plays like this all the time. Hard to find it AI, especially so early.. He has… quirks..In post 38, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 36, geraintm wrote:@meuh
So...I have a way if random voting in every single game I play. Scorpious wanted me to break that pattern because they didn't want to go to 4 votes so quickly, but I ain't breaking my method for them. You can call it shutting down the conversation, but my last game had scorpious in it and they know elegantly what I was going to do
You seem overly worried about how you look.
VOTE: Meuh
Elaborate?In post 43, Crescent wrote:The worst of the votes on you is the guy MM just voted, interestingly enough.
Statements like this concern me.In post 60, Uncle Vanya wrote:How is mine even bad. Self-voting is always anti-town.In post 58, Meuh wrote:Vanya's vote looks worse to me; sure it's earlier but it actually has some merit as an attempt to push the wagon forwardIn post 43, Crescent wrote:The worst of the votes on you is the guy MM just voted, interestingly enough.
geraintm's isolated vote that doesn't seem to be made as such an attempt looks better to me.
though I think geraintm is scummier than Vanya?
I think the vote post itself looks worse for Vanya but further posts from geraintm muddies their alignment
Because it seems like they are basing their actions based on a certain player reaction.
Yes very common.In post 69, Crescent wrote:New players tend to see things as very black and white like above.. But Vanya specifically said he's an alt.
Is playing on an alt common practice here?
As far as I know you only have to declare you alt to the mods upon signup.In post 72, Scorpious wrote:Just look in the forum. I think there is a spot that you must declare who your main is.In post 69, Crescent wrote:New players tend to see things as very black and white like above.. But Vanya specifically said he's an alt.
Is playing on an alt common practice here?
I’m always too lazy, or don’t care enough.
And yes.. it’s super common. I’m not a fan.
In post 82, Meuh wrote:Can you elaborate on this point?In post 66, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Based on expecting certain player reactions.
To me, something is is only pro or anti town if someone reads it as such. This is his personal opinion, and he is acting like some mafia matra should be a basis for how the game proceeds. It seems like he is setting up some false basis on how to target players in future posts.Uncle Vanya wrote: How is mine even bad. Self-voting is always anti-town.
Maybe they are just scumhunting?In post 93, Carcalilly wrote:89 92Carcalilly wrote: I also think its funny that people will blow up their motives for them.
I will add these to the gallery.
maybe I'm dumb and can't really see that much in two short sentences. my gut is softly telling me someone is piggybacking off this for hunting creds. I'll get back to you if I ever pinpoint who.
Not_Mafia, I assume.In post 158, Crescent wrote:What is NM, for the record?In post 156, Scorpious wrote:In post 152, Roden wrote:Oh damn, I kinda like this
Though NM is screwed if he replaces in at some point lmao
This is weird, why would you have an opinion on a mod message? Are you happy Titus’ content didn’t count for some reason? Does the rule excite you?
And why envoke NM? I don’t get it. This prompted me to look at your iso and there isn’t much there.
Yeah it's called scumhunting buddy. Nothing he has done is towny so far.In post 203, Crescent wrote:Because your behavior is far scummier.In post 199, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Well, we all have a right to our opinion but I disagree. Why are you defending his scummy behavior?
I have 0 interest in lynching him right now based on your reaction to him.
I voted him first, so it can't be OMGUS on my part.In post 208, Crescent wrote:There you go spouting OMGUS like some kind of mystic shield again. The reason he voted you is valid. I've already said I would have come prodding you had I noticed the very thing he voted you for.In post 207, MonkeyMan576 wrote:OMGUS isn't legitimate. It's saving your butt. And I'm obviously not sure, but I'm a lot more comfortable with him than anyone else.
The only one applying OMGUS right now is *you*.
He just isn't giving me town vibes. Maybe I was reaching a little bit. It's called exerting pressure.In post 209, Scorpious wrote:Oh, you did?In post 194, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Just because my posts are short doesn't make them useless. I've already caught scum, for example. If you want to wagon me over short posts, go ahead.
Because of an “omgus” vote?
It's not a good reason. This is my posting style if you've done any meta on me.In post 220, Crescent wrote:...For a LEGITIMATELYIn post 218, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Yeah I had a valid point about his saying that self voting is scummy, his reaction to me calling him out on it was bad. He could have actually responded to my comments, instead he just votes me.
GOOD
REASON
You are acting like he blind voted you with no reasoning.
It doesn't have anything to do with him being an alt. It has to do with multiple players saying his reaction was legit, which while I disagree, I'm not going to fight an uphill battle this early in the game. I realize I was reaching.In post 239, Crescent wrote:Wouldn't him being an alt make him *more* likely to be "OMGUSing" you, since according to you, he should already know how you post?In post 234, MonkeyMan576 wrote:It's possible. Maybe I'm being to hard on him. Andres' lurking is not impressing me so far, either.
It feels a bit odd that having it re-established he's an alt would derive a "maybe I'm overreacting" response.
It's not really OMGUS, and I've explained my "anti-town behavior".In post 247, Uncle Vanya wrote:I understand shit like this can feel scummy, but I've found its always scummy from experienced users. Like someone who's over friendly and posting unrelated bullshit.In post 190, Crescent wrote:Which they have done.In post 186, Uncle Vanya wrote:Moose did the "Hello guys" then dipped.
Literally null until they post more.
And it was not town feeling at all.
I usually mod games more than I play, which can't be confirmed cause I'm an alt. But users who come back after a while write stuff like that like it's their first day of school, and more often than not it's never AI.
It's just off-putting to call Moose scummy at this point. They feel like low-hanging fruit.
Isn't stuff like this what you called me out for earlier?In post 207, MonkeyMan576 wrote:OMGUS isn't legitimate. It's saving your butt. And I'm obviously not sure, but I'm a lot more comfortable with him than anyone else.
[quote="In post 84, MonkeyMan576"
To me, something is is only pro or anti town if someone reads it as such. This is his personal opinion, and he is acting like some mafia matra should be a basis for how the game proceeds. It seems like he is setting up some false basis on how to target players in future posts.
This is very short sighted.In post 269, geraintm wrote:I will not pay any attention to people's pressure unless it is backed up by a vote, it is just posturing otherwise. If it ain't jn a vote count I will totally forget it ever existedIn post 197, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I can pressure someone without voting for them. There's not exactly a lot of posts to go on so far, but from what I've seen you are obvscum.
Oh, is that your real name? Sorry.In post 285, geraintm wrote:You mean my name?In post 268, MonkeyMan576 wrote:maybe you should have an actual word as your username*shrug*
You're waiting on one player?In post 353, Carcalilly wrote:im very softly hoping andres will come back a lil later and provide something like they seem to be promising, so I don't mind waiting a few more days on that.
