Open 859 - C9++ - Postgame

[furtiveglance]

What's the likeliest ratios in the setup? 10/3 and 10/2/1?

[Alianna]

1.02

Votecount 1.02

froggodoggo (4): Lucian, Aisa, Cat Scratch Fever, Infinity 324
Infinity 324 (2): furtiveglance, froggodoggo
Lucian (1): Klick
Cat Scratch Fever (1): Malakittens
Malakittens (1): Gamma Emerald

Not Voting (4): Dunnstral, BlueBloodedToffee, Hiraki, Enchant

With 13 players alive, it takes 7 votes to secure an elimination.

The day deadline is in (expired on 2022-07-24 18:36:43).

[furtiveglance]

Ok, I actually didn't see that froggo voted Infinity.

[furtiveglance]

I just found them sus

[froggodoggo]

What's the likeliest ratios in the setup? 10/3 and 10/2/1?

not gonna do the exact statistics but it's looking like the most likely ratio is 10/3, then 9/3/1, then 10/2/1, and then 11/2

[Cat Scratch Fever]

Ok, I actually didn't see that froggo voted Infinity.

I just found them sus

Why? They seem fine?

[froggodoggo]

They seem fine?

but no comment about the larger wagon on me? that your own RVS vote is supporting?

[Enchant]

why i am not SK

[Malakittens]

I’m SK.

[Cat Scratch Fever]

They seem fine?

but no comment about the larger wagon on me? that your own RVS vote is supporting?

I don't really have a read on you yet. I think a 4-vote wagon isn't that out of the ordinary for RVS. Does it bother you for some reason?

[Enchant]

VOTE: Mala

[froggodoggo]

They seem fine?

but no comment about the larger wagon on me? that your own RVS vote is supporting?

I don't really have a read on you yet. I think a 4-vote wagon isn't that out of the ordinary for RVS. Does it bother you for some reason?

IMO the "they seem fine" seems defensive of furtive putting pressure on infinity -- which is contradictory to a 4-vote wagon being normal

[Cat Scratch Fever]

IMO the (a) "they seem fine" seems defensive of furtive putting pressure on infinity -- (b) which is contradictory to a 4-vote wagon being normal

It's very unclear to me how (b) follows from or is related to (a)

[froggodoggo]

IMO the (a) "they seem fine" seems defensive of furtive putting pressure on infinity -- (b) which is contradictory to a 4-vote wagon being normal

It's very unclear to me how (b) follows from or is related to (a)

i'm trying to say that you're questioning why votes are on infinity while you're perfectly fine with votes on me

[Cat Scratch Fever]

oh yea, furtive's Infinity vote seemed non-random

but if that's the case, then why not say why you're voting them to start a Serious Wagon (TM)?

[froggodoggo]

oh yea, furtive's Infinity vote seemed non-random

but if that's the case, then why not say why you're voting them to start a Serious Wagon (TM)?

i dunno. vote infinity with me?

[Cat Scratch Fever]

making one RVS vote for another seems like a lateral move tbh

[froggodoggo]

making one RVS vote for another seems like a lateral move tbh

i don't know what you mean by that. doesn't have to be an RVS vote. i think infinity is sus for saying they want info out of RVS yet they vote a conf townie (no reason to pressure someone who is confirmed) and then put a vote on me without reason (how do you get info out of someone you're not actively interacting with?)

[Cat Scratch Fever]

VOTE: infinity

Sure

[BlueBloodedToffee]

VOTE: Infinity

[froggodoggo]

Hi bluebloodedtoffee. you dont know me but i've read a couple games while waiting to get in one myself and i really like your playstyle. i hope you are town this game.

goodnight townies. SK if youre out there goodnight to you too.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I am town this game.

Are you town this game?

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Can I ask which games you have read?

[Alianna]

~•~

[Alianna]

~•~