In post 1023, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Froggo, can the same not be applied to Infinity? Check my previous post regarding their read progression on Enchant and tell me how it makes sense.
In post 574, Infinity 324 wrote:i mean after the past few pages i still don't have more than a slight scumlean on BBT. still prefer csf to be honest. i guess furtive is towny for agreeing with me there (also i don't really see a reason for scum to be starting a big fight here? maybe if like enchant is a buddy. idk)
In post 930, froggodoggo wrote:Surprised to see people saying this was a bad kill or even a vig shoot -- to me this is pretty obviously a low info kill which I find usually indicates that mafia are playing very well in the day and so they can sacrifice a potential suspect like Mala in order to keep the gamestate the same.
In post 933, Klick wrote:Like the only Mafia I can see making this kill is... possibly you? It's too out of left field for anyone else
Explain? I wouldn't make this kill, I genuinely thought I'd be shit on at the start of this day and so I as mafia would probably kill whoever would look best after I flip red and try to talk my way out of the elim as best as possible.
But this isn't a great argument since it only really applies if you already trust me.
Do you have any idea of what players would be in position to make a kill like this in this game based on your reasoning?
In post 1022, froggodoggo wrote:Skimming through when enchant first got voted and furtive is catching my attention.
Spoiler:
Was initially opposed to the enchant vote:
In post 342, furtiveglance wrote:I don't like the Enchant vote, they read more town than scum to me. I'd take a BBT vote if Hiraki is really against CSF going, but I'm feeling like CSF is scum.
In post 344, furtiveglance wrote:The thing that sticks in my mind is them asking GE whether they would sheep them on a read - the concept of having good reads or bad reads showed a Town POV.
and mentions Enchant when talking to other players multiple times, but never once tries to actually interact with Enchant. this is something I thought was scummy of furtive earlier in the game but now that it applies directly to a flipped scum I think it's a lot more concerning.
In post 608, furtiveglance wrote:My reason for chainsawing for Enchant was less that I townleaned them for their ISO, but more that I scumread other people more and considered some Enchant voters (e.g. BBT) to be voting the easy wagon.
this also doesn't align with their earlier TR of enchant
In post 567, furtiveglance wrote:I'm going to bed now. Hiraki/Me/Lucian/Aisa/Froggo are the towncore, Dunnstral/Enchant/Infinity/Klick/Malakittens have done enough for a temporary townpass, BBT/CSF/GE contains the motherload of Impostors.
With this list, the phrase 'have done enough for a temporary townpass' was only really about Infinity and Klick. The other three I'd say haven't done enough to be town, but also haven't stood out to me as scummy in the same way that my bottom three have.
here is furtive trying to sneak Enchant into their "townpass" list
In post 728, furtiveglance wrote:I'm not really buying it, but I'll unvote anyway to see what others think.
could see this coming from town but it's certainly fence-sitty and an unvote on scum is an unvote on scum.
In post 515, furtiveglance wrote:
Oh I forgot to say, I'm not going to give PR claims the usual respect in this setup, because I would definitely pick a random role as scum.
This you?
Yes it's me. I literally said I'm not buying it, but I want to allow discussion first. If others also doubt the claim I will re-vote.
nice one from BBT again, wack that yall think BBT is scum
In post 300, Alianna wrote:Cat Scratch Fever (E-2): furtiveglance, Lucian, Infinity 324, froggodoggo, Klick
and to backtrack a bit, furtive was on the early CSF wagon, and i'm pretty sure CSF is town. Klick and Lucian also look pretty good IMO so I think furtive being a scum on this wagon fits nicely.
VOTE: furtiveglance
BBT and others who TR furtive, talk to me about why please?? this ISO is riddled with scumpings that connect them to Enchant and I want em outta here
Ayo why me breh?
On the real though, I was initially wrong on Enchant but reconsidered when Hiraki and Lucian (conftown and strong TR) voted them, and Lucian in particular made a strong case on them. As for "unvote on scum is an unvote on scum", I didn't want a Doctor to get hammered before anyone weighed in. I literally said I didn't buy the claim and supported that elimination.
I have a very dumb reason to think Dunn is Townie. He said how nobody called out the fact Enchant was different than in Terminator beforehand, right? I feel like an Enchant scumbuddy would know that was called out, and this seems like something very weird to fake. I dunno.
In post 972, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I agree that Klick is very likely town from the Enchant flip, my unvote of Enchant looks bad, I agree with that, too. But I started scum reading Klick and it gave me second thoughts about Enchant. My scum read on Klick was going nowhere either in terms of building a wagon so if I wanted to pick a counter wagon for Enchant I could have chosen someone better than Klick.
I have zero qualms seeing this as Dunn's scum game, having also gone through some of his recent stuff
I felt like he was really easy for me to read as town in NQNM2, and the fact that I haven't felt he's town here has had me on alert. But I haven't really had sufficient reason to outright think he's scum.
I can't pinpoint exactly what the difference is though? I guess Dunn felt really... idk, loose, willing to go against the grain without clear benefit to himself. It could be that he's got less to disagree with here. Or he's just not as into this one - he did say he felt there wasn't much to work with earlier. Or maybe he's scum. I don't know
Gamma however just has waaay more clear interest in straight solving as town than faking it in a compelling way as scum I feel. Here right from the get-go he just starts solving, boom froggo townread, boom Klick townread, let's see if furtive slips on Hiraki knowledge randomly, it's scummy let's vote him, oh look Lucian is town, etc. It's clear his top interest is in solving the game. I haven't felt that sort of energy from playing with them being scum previously. And it's consistent throughout the game, Gamma actually just wants to solve this and that seems obvious to me.
Interested in them explaining their progression on Enchant and the re-evals they said they'll do. Helps that I townread both the people voting them currently.
In post 1033, Lucian wrote:I want to make my vote useful in the meantime:
VOTE: Infinity
Interested in them explaining their progression on Enchant and the re-evals they said they'll do. Helps that I townread both the people voting them currently.
This feels wack. You’re interested in Infinity’s re-evals but also feel okay voting them?
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
I think they have above rand chance of being scum currently. The fact that people whom I Townread are voting there helps. I am not advocating for a quicklim, as indicated by the fact that I said I want to see their re-eval.
In post 967, Dunnstral wrote:Actually, I changed my mind about furtive, I don't think they look that bad. Klick, do you think that 475 is anti-partner indicative between BBT and froggo? (I do)
I'm pretty satisfied with that post being about a scumbuddy - but I'm interested in why you think otherwise. He puts some effort into casing froggo, but it doesn't really go anywhere.
It would mean BBT would be drawing attention to one scum buddy before voting for the other one, which while possible does not feel like the most likely series of events. Also this attention on Froggo sort of came out of nowhere so I'm not sure why they would do that as mafia partners.
In post 930, froggodoggo wrote:Surprised to see people saying this was a bad kill or even a vig shoot -- to me this is pretty obviously a low info kill which I find usually indicates that mafia are playing very well in the day and so they can sacrifice a potential suspect like Mala in order to keep the gamestate the same.
In post 933, Klick wrote:Like the only Mafia I can see making this kill is... possibly you? It's too out of left field for anyone else
Explain? I wouldn't make this kill, I genuinely thought I'd be shit on at the start of this day and so I as mafia would probably kill whoever would look best after I flip red and try to talk my way out of the elim as best as possible.
But this isn't a great argument since it only really applies if you already trust me.
Do you have any idea of what players would be in position to make a kill like this in this game based on your reasoning?
I also kinda want this answered froggo
Probably players with the most townreads, if i had to name names I think i'd be looking at aisa and lucian? But I don't necessarily think either are scum rn I need to look further
In post 1022, froggodoggo wrote:Skimming through when enchant first got voted and furtive is catching my attention.
Spoiler:
Was initially opposed to the enchant vote:
In post 342, furtiveglance wrote:I don't like the Enchant vote, they read more town than scum to me. I'd take a BBT vote if Hiraki is really against CSF going, but I'm feeling like CSF is scum.
In post 344, furtiveglance wrote:The thing that sticks in my mind is them asking GE whether they would sheep them on a read - the concept of having good reads or bad reads showed a Town POV.
and mentions Enchant when talking to other players multiple times, but never once tries to actually interact with Enchant. this is something I thought was scummy of furtive earlier in the game but now that it applies directly to a flipped scum I think it's a lot more concerning.
In post 608, furtiveglance wrote:My reason for chainsawing for Enchant was less that I townleaned them for their ISO, but more that I scumread other people more and considered some Enchant voters (e.g. BBT) to be voting the easy wagon.
this also doesn't align with their earlier TR of enchant
In post 567, furtiveglance wrote:I'm going to bed now. Hiraki/Me/Lucian/Aisa/Froggo are the towncore, Dunnstral/Enchant/Infinity/Klick/Malakittens have done enough for a temporary townpass, BBT/CSF/GE contains the motherload of Impostors.
With this list, the phrase 'have done enough for a temporary townpass' was only really about Infinity and Klick. The other three I'd say haven't done enough to be town, but also haven't stood out to me as scummy in the same way that my bottom three have.
here is furtive trying to sneak Enchant into their "townpass" list
In post 728, furtiveglance wrote:I'm not really buying it, but I'll unvote anyway to see what others think.
could see this coming from town but it's certainly fence-sitty and an unvote on scum is an unvote on scum.
In post 515, furtiveglance wrote:
Oh I forgot to say, I'm not going to give PR claims the usual respect in this setup, because I would definitely pick a random role as scum.
This you?
Yes it's me. I literally said I'm not buying it, but I want to allow discussion first. If others also doubt the claim I will re-vote.
nice one from BBT again, wack that yall think BBT is scum
In post 300, Alianna wrote:Cat Scratch Fever (E-2): furtiveglance, Lucian, Infinity 324, froggodoggo, Klick
and to backtrack a bit, furtive was on the early CSF wagon, and i'm pretty sure CSF is town. Klick and Lucian also look pretty good IMO so I think furtive being a scum on this wagon fits nicely.
VOTE: furtiveglance
BBT and others who TR furtive, talk to me about why please?? this ISO is riddled with scumpings that connect them to Enchant and I want em outta here
Ayo why me breh?
On the real though, I was initially wrong on Enchant but reconsidered when Hiraki and Lucian (conftown and strong TR) voted them, and Lucian in particular made a strong case on them. As for "unvote on scum is an unvote on scum", I didn't want a Doctor to get hammered before anyone weighed in. I literally said I didn't buy the claim and supported that elimination.
All of this is true but none of it makes me think you're not mafia /shrug
Froggo, you understand the post you quoted from Infinity means it's unlikely Furtive is aligned with Enchant and it's more likely that scum!Infinity tried to tie town!Furtive to Enchant, right?
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
This was the VC (with furtive unvoting Enchant and Klick voting him) when BBT made 760 and the following posts against Klick. I don't think this makes sense coming from an Enchant partner because nobody wanted to kill Klick at the time? I think I was suspicious of him, but I made it clear I preferred Enchant, and I'm not sure if anyone else was. And BBT is calling Klick Town Today. So I'm really not sure what scum!BBT gains from this diversion and why he does it in the first place.