As I now think CSF is very likely Town, I'm gonna assume this post comes from Town, too. A quicklim on Day 1 as scum is always nice, and it seems like a lot of players in this game aren't too familiar with Enchant. So I don't see why scum!Gamma would call this out.In post 290, Gamma Emerald wrote:be aware enchant will hammer if anyone gets to e-1
Dunn, do you think that 588 was talking about the rate Enchant was posting at? Because it was about his content.In post 1042, Dunnstral wrote:And based on my experiences that's not true; I've always seen them post at about this rateIn post 1008, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:The case on enchant was never "enchant is not doing anything"
It was "enchant is doing less than usual"
Because he wanted to proceed fully despite the claim. I think scum!Klick at least waits for thread to respond to Enchant's claim first in case there is a chance Enchant is saved from the elim. With Enchant being Roleblocker, I would expect scum to not really want to bus them and to want to save them at any opportunity (kind of how Frog did with his posting around the hammer)In post 1031, Lucian wrote: Why is Klick Townier from the Enchant flip?
Why is Dunn getting more red?In post 1057, Hiraki wrote:I read everything but there's a lot of fluff. Lucian is still townie but is incorrect (which is fine) but Dunn is getting more red. Everyone else is about the same.
Yeah I can see that but also its something that i wanted infinity to comment on now that enchant flipped redIn post 1047, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Froggo, you understand the post you quoted from Infinity means it's unlikely Furtive is aligned with Enchant and it's more likely that scum!Infinity tried to tie town!Furtive to Enchant, right?
True but I had intent to put Enchant at E-1 until furtive beat me to itIn post 1051, Lucian wrote:I do think my Townread on froggo did go down quite a bit. The "damn I should've hammered!" read I had yesterday is probably not that Townie, considering Enchant did flip scum.
froggo also fits in the group of players that didn't vote Enchant up to claim, but did vote him after the claim.
I really doubt that comment from infinity is AI??In post 1054, Lucian wrote:I think I dislike 1035. Two things have been asked of Infinity, to do their re-eval and to explain their progression on Enchant. The first one takes time, but the second one shouldn't. So I'd kind of expect town!Infinity to say why they changed their mind on Enchant at least, while scum!Infinity is more likely to go "yeah sorry getting to this game tomorrow".
these were slots that Lucian could compromise on elimming on (other than Enchant)In post 520, Lucian wrote:Right now it's Klick, BBT, Malakittens, maybe CSF and Infinity. Some of my reads I need to re-evaluate, but I haven't found the time yet.In post 519, froggodoggo wrote:Care to name the slots Lucian?
looks like Lucian has pretty natural read progression actually! I would say this probably means these two can't be maf together?In post 587, Lucian wrote:In post 571, Infinity 324 wrote:like pushing what seems like a utr with 3 days left until the deadline is not super productiveThe more I think about it, the more I dislike this "pushing a UTR is not productive" line from Infinity. While I would agree that pushing a UTR this close to deadline isn't productive (especially with a case that isn't that good, no offense BBT), that push lasted about 3 and a half hours, approximately? and then BBT gave up on it, had some actual conclusions as a consequence of making that push, and started doing other things. So giving this criticismIn post 579, Infinity 324 wrote:oh i was talking about the part where bbt was pushing froggoafterthat happened feels off.
Looking at that Terminator game now before I get distracted again.
dont understand this from gamma. everyone thinks differently but i don't see how that's weird from lucian whatsoever. its just putting pressure on people who Lucian wants info fromIn post 1034, Gamma Emerald wrote:This feels wack. You’re interested in Infinity’s re-evals but also feel okay voting them?In post 1033, Lucian wrote:I want to make my vote useful in the meantime:
VOTE: Infinity
Interested in them explaining their progression on Enchant and the re-evals they said they'll do. Helps that I townread both the people voting them currently.
This is super convincing but I also think if infinity is mafia Gamma is their partner:In post 1032, Klick wrote:Gamma however just has waaay more clear interest in straight solving as town than faking it in a compelling way as scum I feel. Here right from the get-go he just starts solving, boom froggo townread, boom Klick townread, let's see if furtive slips on Hiraki knowledge randomly, it's scummy let's vote him, oh look Lucian is town, etc. It's clear his top interest is in solving the game. I haven't felt that sort of energy from playing with them being scum previously. And it's consistent throughout the game, Gamma actually just wants to solve this and that seems obvious to me.
New term: Intent to E-1.In post 1062, froggodoggo wrote:True but I had intent to put Enchant at E-1 until furtive beat me to itIn post 1051, Lucian wrote:I do think my Townread on froggo did go down quite a bit. The "damn I should've hammered!" read I had yesterday is probably not that Townie, considering Enchant did flip scum.
froggo also fits in the group of players that didn't vote Enchant up to claim, but did vote him after the claim.
I was waiting for someone else to bring this up but what?!?! I can kind of see how he could get that idea but...In post 890, Dunnstral wrote:I am leaning towards eliminating them; I think they slipped that their team has a roleblocker on it.In post 759, Klick wrote:I'm interested in your take on whether Enchant could be telling the truth here Dunn
In post 751, Enchant wrote:Techically speaking i probably will be chainroleblocked and lemoned later anyway.
hmm, yeah I didn't remember the wording looking this bad from Enchant and Dunn catches it pretty instantly. could be a big ol mafia conspiracy but Dunn is probably town for this!!In post 753, Dunnstral wrote:Roleblocker isn't guaranteed by the setup mate
When did I say I was town for it?? you're not allowed to speak for me and then say I have to be elimmedIn post 1069, furtiveglance wrote:Froggo really trynna scrape himself some towncred for 'intent to E-1', this slot needs to go today or tomorrow.
Cmon man. You did this to yourself, I'm not putting anything in your mouth.In post 1062, froggodoggo wrote:True but I had intent to put Enchant at E-1 until furtive beat me to itIn post 1051, Lucian wrote:I do think my Townread on froggo did go down quite a bit. The "damn I should've hammered!" read I had yesterday is probably not that Townie, considering Enchant did flip scum.
froggo also fits in the group of players that didn't vote Enchant up to claim, but did vote him after the claim.
Why make this post? Why 6 hours?In post 719, froggodoggo wrote:Putting Enchant at E-1 in 6 hrs if no one else has done so already