Mafia would have said "didnt roll maf," and Town would have said "didnt roll town"
Interesting. I see it as the opposite, more likely to have come from Mafia. The non-denial denial. The truth, but not the whole truth.
I think that's pretty theoretical as it dismisses the characteristics of players. If I am not mistaking them, then Meg simply likes 3rd party roles a lot, which is why it's pretty nai to me.
Do you think Meg have been scummy aside from that opening? Assuming you were actually legit suspecting them when I got it right.
I kind of like ceejay's 49. At least the first genuine town pings I got this game. The Enchant vote supports it, although Enchant is rather pretty null to me, but I felt about it kind of similar.
Sounds like something an SK would say.... VOTE: MegAzumarill
SK specifically?
Of course.
Mafia would have said "didnt roll maf," and Town would have said "didnt roll town"
I don't think this is true.
What about N_M's claim?
You seem to have already worked out that that's RVS logic, but your implication of believing Not_Mafia's claim interests me. Why aren't you voting him if you believe him?
In post 77, Testarossa wrote:I kind of like ceejay's 49. At least the first genuine town pings I got this game. The Enchant vote supports it, although Enchant is rather pretty null to me, but I felt about it kind of similar.
You bringing it up as a counter to Meg being SK, at a time when you ostensibly believed it was a serious accusation, implies that you believe the claim. If you didn't, it wouldn't interfere with Meg hypothetically being SK at all
In post 77, Testarossa wrote:I kind of like ceejay's 49. At least the first genuine town pings I got this game. The Enchant vote supports it, although Enchant is rather pretty null to me, but I felt about it kind of similar.
ceejayvinoya wrote:
I don't really like how it did not point out anything happening so far or really push anything or something.
Of course this could just be Standard Enchant Behavior and you're free to tell me more about this.
Enchant is a trolly/shitposty player who's secretly one of the better players on site. He'll have infrequent/insignificant posts until there's something worth saying. Frankly, I'd be more worried about him if he WERE putting in effort this early.
That aside, those posts would be fairly normal RVS posts from many people, and I'm curious why low-effort RVS was scummier to you than what you perceived to be an actual scummy vote?
"actual scummy vote" is not really accurate and is too strong a description. Here:
It's not really a scummy vote but her responding to the inactivity in the thread with a random vote sort of rubbed me the wrong way.
Also it's not accurate to say that low effort rvs is what I found scummy on enchant's posts. I voted him because his second non-rvs post was unrelated to anything so far that happened in game and did nothing.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
In post 86, ceejayvinoya wrote:It's not really a scummy vote but her responding to the inactivity in the thread with a random vote sort of rubbed me the wrong way.
Also it's not accurate to say that low effort rvs is what I found scummy on enchant's posts. I voted him because his second non-rvs post was unrelated to anything so far that happened in game and did nothing.
Okay, I'm starting to see where you're coming from.
I don't particularly agree with you, but I get it.
Will confer with myself and place a serious vote tonight.
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
Gypyx has been prodded. I will be looking for a replacement for imaginality due to inactivity. If imaginality posts before I find a replacement, they may stay in the game.
Hey Ceejay, is your vote still on enchant because the explaination for his positng style didn't convince you, or like, do you just don't see anywhere to switch to?
Mafia would have said "didnt roll maf," and Town would have said "didnt roll town"
Interesting. I see it as the opposite, more likely to have come from Mafia. The non-denial denial. The truth, but not the whole truth.
I think that's pretty theoretical as it dismisses the characteristics of players. If I am not mistaking them, then Meg simply likes 3rd party roles a lot, which is why it's pretty nai to me.
Do you think Meg have been scummy aside from that opening? Assuming you were actually legit suspecting them when I got it
I don't think someone who likes 3rd party roles is necessarily any more likely to post saying they didn't get the role. 39 rats thinks SK would deny being SK but I think Meg is a bit smarter than that. For scum, "I didn't get SK" is a convenient way to contribute some truthful content and seem to be joining the conversation.
I'm not proclaiming this as proof or anything but it was definitely enough for a page 1 vote.
As for Meg's play since, there's not been a lot to go on. (Yes, same with most of us, I know.) At any rate nothing to make me think my initial hunch is wrong. Whereas with ceejay's posts since I said I had my eye on them actually have shifted me to lean town on them.
"holy shit this entire time i thought imaginalitys profile was a purple seahorse" - camelCasedSnivy
I feel like I am reaching for straws, I don't really agree with imaginality's reasoning, however I think he really believes in what he has found on Meg and his read progression on ceejay seems to be in line... maybe town? I will probably just roll with it with nothing else on the hand.
@Meg:
What do you make out of the increasing townreads on ceejay?
