Would they? I'd think one scum would try to distance themself from another, not risk it all for one vote during RVS.In post 22, Player6 wrote:well, we're in RVS and I feel that while bellaphant's vote on me seemed very sus as when there are multiple mafia sometimes one might vote the person who is throwing suspicion at them to shut them up. So when I voted greeting and the post after bellaphant voted for me seemed like that. Also I really dont get how saying hi to the mod and voting someone would be "really awkward" when that's what everyone else is doin. Seems like justifying something after the fact. Also Greeting your RVS vote on Bellaphant doesn't really mean anything as you could just change it later. I mean that seems like the kind of "evidence" that you throw around that doesn't make any sense when held up to any amount of scrutiny
I really don't see how Player6's entrance was awkward. I think Bella voted for him without a reason (which would be fine, since the game was still in the RVS) and then retroactively invented a reason once Player6 voted for them.In post 19, Bellaphant wrote:.a) I'm not new
B) that's not why I voted you. Your post was really awkward and felt like new scum posting for something to say. It doesn't pass the so what test.
I think bella's reasoning tracks. my big issue is that spartan, greeting and ghardi all came in with little to say and out of the three I think greeting looks the worst.In post 29, BlueSnakelet wrote:I'll just go ahead and VOTE: Bella for now.
I really don't see how Player6's entrance was awkward. I think Bella voted for him without a reason (which would be fine, since the game was still in the RVS) and then retroactively invented a reason once Player6 voted for them.In post 19, Bellaphant wrote:.a) I'm not new
B) that's not why I voted you. Your post was really awkward and felt like new scum posting for something to say. It doesn't pass the so what test.
Page 2 looks like a good time for a juicy RVS HammerIn post 29, BlueSnakelet wrote:I'll just go ahead and VOTE: Bella for now.
you have been judged Bella to be too sussy for our company. Begone! That's not a hammer. Bella is in E-1 now. Tapioca unvoted.In post 31, Spartan117 wrote:Page 2 looks like a good time for a juicy RVS HammerIn post 29, BlueSnakelet wrote:I'll just go ahead and VOTE: Bella for now.
VOTE: Bellaphant
Sure, if it helps drive conversation.In post 35, Tapiocaphobe wrote:hey spartan are you scum
Thanks for clarifying what you mean Player6. I still don't see Bella voting you as suspicious – This is the RVS so we're just trying to get the ball rolling and get some discussion going.In post 22, Player6 wrote:well, we're in RVS and I feel that while bellaphant's vote on me seemed very sus as when there are multiple mafia sometimes one might vote the person who is throwing suspicion at them to shut them up. So when I voted greeting and the post after bellaphant voted for me seemed like that. Also I really dont get how saying hi to the mod and voting someone would be "really awkward" when that's what everyone else is doin. Seems like justifying something after the fact. Also Greeting your RVS vote on Bellaphant doesn't really mean anything as you could just change it later. I mean that seems like the kind of "evidence" that you throw around that doesn't make any sense when held up to any amount of scrutiny
In regards to Greeting's question - I think what Greeting meant was that you grouped them (Bellaphant and Greeting) together as a Mafia duo but Greeting voted Bella - that is you grouped them together as Mafia Duo with Mafia voting one of their own in the RVS. I don't think there is anything to Greeting's vote as you explained.In post 20, Greeting wrote:How do you feel about my RVS vote onIn post 16, Player6 wrote:VOTE: Bellaphant Greeting and bellaphant are mafia duo. I voted greeting and bellaphant voted me seems like a newbie mistakeBellaphant?
One mafia found, one to go!In post 37, Spartan117 wrote:Kinda hoped for more of a reaction from my test rather than being outted, let it be known if anyone votes for bella now and Hammers that they are scum.
Why would anyone do that?In post 29, BlueSnakelet wrote:I'll just go ahead and VOTE: Bella for now.
I really don't see how Player6's entrance was awkward. I think Bella voted for him without a reason (which would be fine, since the game was still in the RVS) and then retroactively invented a reason once Player6 voted for them.In post 19, Bellaphant wrote:.a) I'm not new
B) that's not why I voted you. Your post was really awkward and felt like new scum posting for something to say. It doesn't pass the so what test.
Yesh I'm getting that vibe too, think you probably rolled green again too, cab you really roll Red (idk how many) that many times!In post 42, Bellaphant wrote:Gihardi, Spartan and tapioaco maybe town. #hottakes
Because this was "his post":In post 41, Bellaphant wrote:Why would anyone do that?In post 29, BlueSnakelet wrote:I'll just go ahead and VOTE: Bella for now.
I really don't see how Player6's entrance was awkward. I think Bella voted for him without a reason (which would be fine, since the game was still in the RVS) and then retroactively invented a reason once Player6 voted for them.In post 19, Bellaphant wrote:.a) I'm not new
B) that's not why I voted you. Your post was really awkward and felt like new scum posting for something to say. It doesn't pass the so what test.
Why is that more likely than 'i really didn't like his post '.
Please explain how exactly this is scummy. That's all I'm asking.
Okay thats one in the bag, let's goo! Lets bank it and now on to find the other one! Hmm where should we look?In post 40, Ghardi wrote:One mafia found, one to go!
@BlueIn post 22, Player6 wrote:well, we're in RVS and I feel that while bellaphant's vote on me seemed very sus as when there are multiple mafia sometimes one might vote the person who is throwing suspicion at them to shut them up. So when I voted greeting and the post after bellaphant voted for me seemed like that. Also I really dont get how saying hi to the mod and voting someone would be "really awkward" when that's what everyone else is doin. Seems like justifying something after the fact. Also Greeting your RVS vote on Bellaphant doesn't really mean anything as you could just change it later. I mean that seems like the kind of "evidence" that you throw around that doesn't make any sense when held up to any amount of scrutiny
