GnKoichi wrote:Plum: Clarification: I meant that there are other people who had a scum read on Wall-E before I made my argument, so it wouldn't be a stretch to find evidence against him if Charter flipped scum.
Good grief, GnK, but I want to hear your opinion about the cases on Wall-E to this point. If you don't think they're enough to warrant suspicion now, and had something of a town read on him despite them, I'd hate for you to come back Day 2 and say 'I was right/wrong about Charter, sure, but let's go back and see what Wall-E's done if you
haven't acknowledged any scumtells of his before hand
. You don't seem to have suspicions of Wall-E independent of Charter's votes, you seem to have the willingness to have an easy time 'finding evidence' against him if Chater flips scum. Your behavior here is rediculous. You seem to express contradictory feelings as to whether your suspicions of Wall-E are independent of Charter's actions or not. It seems to be 'no, unless I find it convenient to bring up actions of Wall-E's I hadn't commented on as being scummy at the time after Charter's lynch'. Furthermore, I still don't think your reasons for thinking Wall-E and Charter are a scumteam are legit.
GnKoichi wrote:Okay, how are we even still talking about this? This is not me twisting Charter's words. He is the one trying to make it clear now that Wall-E not being scum is not a hunch, but knowledge. Something that he knows, as in a fact. Not a strong feeling. Not a really good theory. HE is the one who says this. I just called him on it.
As was said before, this has only three implications:
1) He and Wall-E are scum, hence his "knowledge" of who is and isn't a scumbuddy.
2) He is lying, and this proves my point of how misleading he has been ALL GAME!
3) He has information he shouldn't have, making him a cheater (since he didn't get Mod killed for saying this, I assume he isn't).
Whatever you think about me, how is this not the easiest thing to vote for ever?
charter wrote:Why I think GK is scum and Wall-E is not? Just a feeling, obviously I don't know.
Hate to be the voice of reason here, but Charter calling his suspicions/lack thereof so strongly doesn't have to be because he already knows this and doesn't mean he's trying to mislead us into thinking he's got confirmation on that. The way you push this as an absolute declaration by Charter of his own scumminess is rediculous. These are obviously his suspicions. He's wording them strongly, and that just may be the way he does it and certainly is not a wrong way to do it, in my humble opinion. It ain't my way, but in this instance I can look at it and feel fine thinking 'all right, Charter suspects GnK and doesn't think he and Wall-E are scumbuddies' as opposed to 'Charter's saying this because he actually knows who the scumbuddies are because he's scum' or 'He doesn't know this but he's trying to mislead us by implying that he does'. Furthermore, Charter said he thinks
you
are scum and Wall-E isn't, so if he were scum saying this from knowledge, wouldn't he have just implyed
you
as his scumbuddy? Your argument falls to pieces, how fun.
GnKoichi wrote:I don't mean to be arrogant, but is there anything that would make me wrong here? Isn't this the strongest scum argument we've seen all game? EVERYONE! Please throw your votes to Charter! He has almost admitted to being scum. Wall-E is almost certainly his partner, but even if that's wrong, Charter is the best Lynch, by far. No matter what you think about me, if you can't find a counter to my argument, please do the right thing and VOTE FOR CHARTER! . . .
. . . HE ADMITTED TO BEING SCUM!
In my humble opinion, with the absolute craplogic that
has been countered
and calling for votes on him for it vehemantly and IN CAPITAL LETTERS . . . I lack a witty remark, sorry. No, not strongest scum argument we've seen all game. For goodness' sake, he implyed his own suspicions with strong terms, something we've seen in a different light with Wall-E etc. He did not admit to being scum. The way you keep pushing this rediculous accusation is by far closer to 'the stringest scum argument we've seen all game'.
Nameless wrote:Charter has done several dubious things but what you are actually pushing on him amounts to incredibly exaggerated semantics. I pointed this out nicely, and you repeat the craplogic louder. This, plus most of what Kiro argued in #330, makes me reasonably sure you're scum.
Quoted For Truth, friends.
GnKoichi wrote:I haven't seen anyone make a good argument against my Charter/Wall-E theory.
Your theory is based on interpretations that work only at a stretch anyway. My basic interpretation of Charter's vote is like Kiro's: Based on suspicions of OP's quick quote-and-vote of Wall-E, and perhaps partly a warning regarding that. Your interpretation of his vote on you is that he was voting you only because you voted Wall-E his, you suppose, scumbuddy. Instead, he seems to say it's based on gut and his previous case against you, which I personally believe is still valid. Hence I think your strong belief in their buddyship is baloney.
animorpherv1 wrote:I'd like to hear about charter say something about him claiming scum. I think he's either being stupid, or a jester of some sort, so for now.
FOS:charter
IGMEOY
. Read the thread before you repeat untruths and/or craplogic, please, especially if you're coming out of lurking/little posting to do only that.
charter wrote:I'm not saying rush, but lets try and wrap up day one.
It's taking a few pages, but not too long real time-wise and we're getting stuff done, which is good. I've been in a longer Day 1 with fewer people and we ended up lynching scum, so I'm all right with discussion continuing as it will until the lynch.
Unvote, Vote: GnKoichi
). Failing that, GK or Wall-E need more votes.