In post 103, geraintm wrote:Naughty point. Didn't like your stream of postsIn post 67, skitter30 wrote:I dont get, or like, the church wagon
I think we should be wagoning herta or kittytacky
Would love to hear more abt both of these
In post 103, geraintm wrote:Naughty point. Didn't like your stream of postsIn post 67, skitter30 wrote:I dont get, or like, the church wagon
I think we should be wagoning herta or kittytacky
Would love to hear more abt both of these
Idk why people think church is scummyIn post 111, Freedom wrote:Can you expand on this?In post 67, skitter30 wrote:I dont get, or like, the church wagon
I think we should be wagoning herta or kittytacky
Heya unwnd, been a minuteIn post 114, unwnd wrote:Also hello skitter/dann/IV
Im deep in your pockets of flattery alreadyIn post 116, unwnd wrote:IV I need a townread and I think you're a really underrated player
Can you do a little villager jiggle for me
I thought I was in a 1v1 with Toto, which I was but I didn't need to be because IC.In post 122, skitter30 wrote:Ig i'm not sure how you can tell he's displaying these traits at this pointIn post 93, Herta wrote:Every game I've played with kitty that he's been reasonably engaged and stick-to-his-guns as in going deep on a hunch and apparent genuine curiosity he's been town.
Why weren't you willing to answer this question before?
I ... am not even sure how to approach this fully as i don't think they're similar at allIn post 128, unwnd wrote:Could you give a contrast between Herta/Church? I think their posting style is actually similar
I wanted to see how far he'd go with me. Nothing changed except I figured out to drop it.In post 139, skitter30 wrote:I ... am not even sure how to approach this fully as i don't think they're similar at allIn post 128, unwnd wrote:Could you give a contrast between Herta/Church? I think their posting style is actually similar
Herta - i felt a lot of fluffiness/wishy-washyness/agreeing-to-agree in early posts like 33, 34, 35, bandwagon-y church vote, statements that they didn't seen willing (or able) to back up (like the kitty townread off of meta), and the whole 'i don't want to answer these questions' thing
Church - thought 40 was fine, don't love that they've mostly interacted with their wagon thus far and want to see what their content looks like when they come back
Pedit oh dear i hope you find it >.>
Can you explain 137 again plz? Why did you not want to answer the question because you were in a 1v1, and how does him being ic change that?
I'll probably find some time at the office.In post 138, Herta wrote:I lost my phone so will be even slower than usual until I figure out what I'm doing with that.
They both were prompted to respond based on someone else's input.In post 139, skitter30 wrote:I ... am not even sure how to approach this fully as i don't think they're similar at all
I see.In post 126, skitter30 wrote:Idk why people think church is scummyIn post 111, Freedom wrote:Can you expand on this?In post 67, skitter30 wrote:I dont get, or like, the church wagon
I think we should be wagoning herta or kittytacky
I think herta is scummy
I don't like kittytacky's scoliosis push - i don't get how he lost the initial townread so fast, especially since it partially seems based on scoliosis 'not ressponding to kittytacky's question' when he hasnt posted at all since 20, it's not like scoliosis is avoiding kittytacky in particular
Like ig i'm kinda confused how kittytacky can start off liking 20 and then move to disliking it when other people find it scummy without scoliosis posting anything in between
Too lazy to quote the exact part I wantIn post 139, skitter30 wrote:I ... am not even sure how to approach this fully as i don't think they're similar at allIn post 128, unwnd wrote:Could you give a contrast between Herta/Church? I think their posting style is actually similar
Herta - i felt a lot of fluffiness/wishy-washyness/agreeing-to-agree in early posts like 33, 34, 35, bandwagon-y church vote, statements that they didn't seen willing (or able) to back up (like the kitty townread off of meta), and the whole 'i don't want to answer these questions' thing
Church - thought 40 was fine, don't love that they've mostly interacted with their wagon thus far and want to see what their content looks like when they come back
Pedit oh dear i hope you find it >.>
Can you explain 137 again plz? Why did you not want to answer the question because you were in a 1v1, and how does him being ic change that?
1. The val push is unexplained and they ignored my question completely, imo they made it up.In post 124, skitter30 wrote:In post 98, KittyTacky wrote:I just felt like on a re-read his arguments felt like bad faith pushes.In post 81, skitter30 wrote:Yes, i think that's very townieIn post 78, innocentvillager wrote:Trying to create content in RVS counts as obviously town? Man I gotta try that next time
+ you can tell he's thinking abt the game and trying to understand how other people are trying to solve it (or not)
Do you think he's scummy or just don't particularly believe he's townie ?What makes them badfaith?In post 99, KittyTacky wrote:Fairly easy to fake this "towntell" as scum imo.
And a few people indicated that they hadn't seen the ic post, including myself. Are all of them scummy? If not, why is scoliosis?