Yes.In post 1042, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:also dont e-1 until after toto claims his info
I think we need a claim from geraint asap
Yes.In post 1042, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:also dont e-1 until after toto claims his info
No it was a work in progress from the past couple of days. still is a work in progress.In post 1048, innocentvillager wrote:Herta did you write 1043 in response to Pooky..?
Which he hopefully gives.In post 1050, innocentvillager wrote:Yes.In post 1042, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:also dont e-1 until after toto claims his info
I think we need a claim from geraint asap
I sorta retract this upon rethinking about itIn post 1047, innocentvillager wrote:Herta’s posting vibes this page kinda wack idk
I thjnk refusal/cryptic/drawn out claiming is on average quite towny in my empirical experience. Scol’s theory is like possible but it’s more of a hindsight/confbias narrative kind of read imoIn post 1039, Freedom wrote:I see.In post 1035, Scoliosis wrote:His refusal to claim is +scum.In post 1024, Freedom wrote:Not yet.In post 1023, Val89 wrote:Are you townreading gera now, Freedom?
I feel like their refusal to claim feels a bit odd.
Though, I would consider them nullish.
UNVOTE:Geraintm's scum strategy can be broken down into three layers of defense:
On the first layer he disappears whenever possible, hoping that others will forget he is present in the game. (His absence of meaningful thought and refusal to get involved with the content between 332 and 572, not to mention most of the discussion which he lurked actively through between his posts 18 and 330.)
On the second layer he pretends to be meek and humble, hoping that others will feel sorry for him and vote someone else. (330, 763, 767 -which is refuted by pookythebear in 836 and 838-, 854 which is unbelievable, 857, etc.)
On his third and final layer he creates intrigue and confusion about his role, hoping others will become uncomfortable with the ambiguity behind his refusal to claim and move on to someone else. (894)
I had thought that his refusal to claim was just a playstyle oddity.
Though, it does seem like maybe it isn't as I thought.
VOTE: gera again.
I'm town.In post 922, innocentvillager wrote:My new scumteam is like Dannflor KittyTacky Herta (???)
I see.innocentvillager wrote:I thjnk refusal/cryptic/drawn out claiming is on average quite towny in my empirical experience. Scol’s theory is like possible but it’s more of a hindsight/confbias narrative kind of read imoIn post 1039, Freedom wrote:I see.In post 1035, Scoliosis wrote:His refusal to claim is +scum.In post 1024, Freedom wrote:Not yet.In post 1023, Val89 wrote:Are you townreading gera now, Freedom?
I feel like their refusal to claim feels a bit odd.
Though, I would consider them nullish.
UNVOTE:Geraintm's scum strategy can be broken down into three layers of defense:
On the first layer he disappears whenever possible, hoping that others will forget he is present in the game. (His absence of meaningful thought and refusal to get involved with the content between 332 and 572, not to mention most of the discussion which he lurked actively through between his posts 18 and 330.)
On the second layer he pretends to be meek and humble, hoping that others will feel sorry for him and vote someone else. (330, 763, 767 -which is refuted by pookythebear in 836 and 838-, 854 which is unbelievable, 857, etc.)
On his third and final layer he creates intrigue and confusion about his role, hoping others will become uncomfortable with the ambiguity behind his refusal to claim and move on to someone else. (894)
I had thought that his refusal to claim was just a playstyle oddity.
Though, it does seem like maybe it isn't as I thought.
VOTE: gera again.
Scol far worse imo. I just don't see town acting that way.In post 964, Ydrasse wrote:let’s take gera off the table because i’m thinking myself into a tr there because he actually was around and didn’t try to like shirk the pressure by lurking among other stuff
herta or scol which one is the worst
I defend Gera because this behavior is NAI for Gera and he's more likely town than scum here.In post 1019, Freedom wrote:I see.In post 1018, skitter30 wrote:In post 890, KittyTacky wrote:If Gera is town he will become smarter come D2.Posts like theseIn post 888, KittyTacky wrote:I refuse to vote Gera rn, he has consistently shown to play like this as town D1 and I don't do policy lims. He always gets run up for shit takes like clockwork. Get Scol instead.
I guess I can see why iv thinks that Kitty is whiteknighting.
It does look like Kitty is defending gera as Scol was the counterwagon.
In post 1067, Toto wrote:Herta why are you scum reading skitter again?
It's pretty much her treatment of me. Her close mindedness just gotten worse as the game has progressed. Typically she is able to at least see what I'm seeing even if she doesn't agree with it.In post 651, Herta wrote:I do think skitter has scum equity. When town she's fairly generous in her analysis and looks at things from a more open point of view. Here I'm finding her not doing that so much. It's like she's picking at little things maybe that I don't think she usually does.