Yeah the no claim stuff is... iffy imo and is making me doubt that read.In post 1092, Val89 wrote:I'm sorry, but I can't see geraintm's play coming from town here anymore; unless he is consciously and deliberately throwing this town game in return for an easier time of it in their next scum game - which frankly is an absolutely shitty thing to do to those of us playing this one. I'm sure someone will correct me if I am mistaken, but I didn't see a refusal to claim being a feature of his D1 play previously and this in particular is a game where we have an IC hinting, if not explicitly claiming by 1075, that they are also an informed IC with info that can help evaluate the veracity of role-claims.In post 1064, KittyTacky wrote:I defend Gera because this behavior is NAI for Gera and he's more likely town than scum here.
To my eyes, this goes both ways: it makes it harder to for scum to fakeclaim, but it also means townshouldclaim in this position, since there is a higher than usual chance of a role-claim, particularly an unusual one, passing the ICs sniff-test and in this particular scenario, since the info is unknown in advance and the source of it when outted is mod-confirmed trustworthy, that being treated as sufficient town-evidence to dodge the lim that might otherwise come.
I still think Scol is (bussing?) scum.